東華大學圖書館 |

Understanding Learning from Failure Process in the Collaborative Design Context.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Understanding Learning from Failure Process in the Collaborative Design Context./
作者:	Yan, Shulong.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	175 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-10B.
標題:	Problem solving. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29050526
ISBN:	9798209932826

Understanding Learning from Failure Process in the Collaborative Design Context.
Yan, Shulong.

Understanding Learning from Failure Process in the Collaborative Design Context. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 175 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Failure as a path to success is a common belief in literature, our daily life, and educational research. With the advocate of integrating design into K-12 education, scholars who study Maker Movement have argued that involving learners in design practice can foster a positive failure mindset. To make failure productive, scholars have suggested the need to actively create a learning environment, provide opportunities to practice, and build the culture to support this learning process. However, examining the literature, few studies have focused on unpacking learning through the lens of failure in the design context. As design is naturally collaborative, it is also essential to examine design from a group's perspective. Synthesizing from the needs and the challenges from literature, this study focused on understanding group-level learning from failure phenomenon in the collaborative design context. Drawing from a sociocultural learning perspective, I focused my analysis on understanding how learning from failure is mediated by two tools - discourse and physical artifact. To guide the analysis, I proposed two research questions: 1) How does a specific discourse pattern mediate a team's opportunity and ability to learn from failure in the collaborative design context? 2) How does the tool configuration mediate teams to learn from failure in the collaborative design context? To answer these two questions, I used the design experiment method to develop a learning space informed by three design principles synthesized from literature. This study recruited 16 students, and they were divided into four teams. As four students were returning students, I decided to group them as an expert team. I followed the interaction analysis approach to select lessons and episodes for analysis from over 75 hours of data in the data analysis. I used discourse analysis and interaction analysis separately to examine the two research questions. In the analysis, I focused on understanding how the moment-to-moment discourse and tool interaction among team members mediate learning from failure. The findings showed that learners could engage in sophisticated design practices and reasoning. However, their discourse patterns influenced their team's ability to learn from failure. The findings also showed that tools played an essential role in mediating the team's learning process. However, each tool can support and at the same time constrain the learning process depending on the relationship between the learners and the tools. This dissertation findings bring both theoretical and design implications. This study calls for reconceptualizing failure and learning from failure in the collaborative design context from a gap between expected and actual performance to a situational and momentary socio-material interaction phenomenon. This study also provided several design iteration suggestions based on the findings.

ISBN: 9798209932826Subjects--Topical Terms:

516855
Problem solving.

Understanding Learning from Failure Process in the Collaborative Design Context.
LDR:04025nmm a2200349 4500 001 2348833
005 20220908125430.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798209932826
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29050526
035 $a (MiAaPQ)PennState_20739suy144
035 $a AAI29050526
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Yan, Shulong. $3 3688207
245 1 0 $a Understanding Learning from Failure Process in the Collaborative Design Context.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 175 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Borge, Marcela.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Failure as a path to success is a common belief in literature, our daily life, and educational research. With the advocate of integrating design into K-12 education, scholars who study Maker Movement have argued that involving learners in design practice can foster a positive failure mindset. To make failure productive, scholars have suggested the need to actively create a learning environment, provide opportunities to practice, and build the culture to support this learning process. However, examining the literature, few studies have focused on unpacking learning through the lens of failure in the design context. As design is naturally collaborative, it is also essential to examine design from a group's perspective. Synthesizing from the needs and the challenges from literature, this study focused on understanding group-level learning from failure phenomenon in the collaborative design context. Drawing from a sociocultural learning perspective, I focused my analysis on understanding how learning from failure is mediated by two tools - discourse and physical artifact. To guide the analysis, I proposed two research questions: 1) How does a specific discourse pattern mediate a team's opportunity and ability to learn from failure in the collaborative design context? 2) How does the tool configuration mediate teams to learn from failure in the collaborative design context? To answer these two questions, I used the design experiment method to develop a learning space informed by three design principles synthesized from literature. This study recruited 16 students, and they were divided into four teams. As four students were returning students, I decided to group them as an expert team. I followed the interaction analysis approach to select lessons and episodes for analysis from over 75 hours of data in the data analysis. I used discourse analysis and interaction analysis separately to examine the two research questions. In the analysis, I focused on understanding how the moment-to-moment discourse and tool interaction among team members mediate learning from failure. The findings showed that learners could engage in sophisticated design practices and reasoning. However, their discourse patterns influenced their team's ability to learn from failure. The findings also showed that tools played an essential role in mediating the team's learning process. However, each tool can support and at the same time constrain the learning process depending on the relationship between the learners and the tools. This dissertation findings bring both theoretical and design implications. This study calls for reconceptualizing failure and learning from failure in the collaborative design context from a gap between expected and actual performance to a situational and momentary socio-material interaction phenomenon. This study also provided several design iteration suggestions based on the findings.
590 $a School code: 0176.
650 4 $a Problem solving. $3 516855
650 4 $a User needs. $3 3682501
650 4 $a Culture. $3 517003
650 4 $a Social interaction. $3 520415
650 4 $a Success. $3 518195
650 4 $a Schools. $3 573554
650 4 $a Social support. $2 lcstt $3 3267467
650 4 $a Teams. $3 3546566
650 4 $a Failure analysis. $3 3563948
650 4 $a Semiotics. $3 517584
650 4 $a Role models. $3 3301554
650 4 $a Collaborative learning. $3 3543645
650 4 $a Feedback. $3 677181
650 4 $a Intelligence. $3 590016
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Self esteem. $3 3562235
650 4 $a Cognition & reasoning. $3 3556293
650 4 $a Information retrieval. $3 566853
650 4 $a Designers. $3 589292
650 4 $a Alternative dispute resolution. $3 3168470
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0649
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0621
710 2 $a The Pennsylvania State University. $3 699896
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-10B.
790 $a 0176
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29050526