東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A History of the British Museum's Repatriation Debates of the Parthenon Marbles and Benin Bronzes.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A History of the British Museum's Repatriation Debates of the Parthenon Marbles and Benin Bronzes./
作者:	Waltman, Katie Lynn.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	80 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-01.
標題:	History. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28539938
ISBN:	9798516067464

A History of the British Museum's Repatriation Debates of the Parthenon Marbles and Benin Bronzes.
Waltman, Katie Lynn.

A History of the British Museum's Repatriation Debates of the Parthenon Marbles and Benin Bronzes. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 80 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01.

Thesis (M.A.)--San Diego State University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

For the last two centuries, much of the ancient Parthenon marble sculptures have been housed in the British Museum. For the past century, the museum has also displayed bronzes from Africa's western coastal Benin region. These cultural objects have been part of repatriation debates in Britain for several decades. Many have argued that the objects should stay in the museum, as it promotes education of different cultures and civilizations. Others oppose on the grounds that the objects were stolen and belong to the country from which they originated. Since the early nineteenth century, British newspapers have reflected the marbles' repatriation debates. They reveal the rationale of why the objects have stayed in the British Museum despite ongoing controversy. A British Parliamentary report from 1816 also provides detailed analyses of the marbles' acquisition and their artistic integrity, which became a basis for their benefit to Britain's cultural arts. Additional Parliamentary reports and newspapers have also provided details about the restitution debates of and claims for the Benin bronzes. A chronological narrative of the two different cultural objects illustrates how the debates and the institutional responses to those debates progressed over many decades. One can identify how and why opinions and reactions to repatriation arguments unfolded over time, and how they varied between the objects during the same time. Although the museum's retention of the marbles and bronzes have been involved in major discussions for decades, very little scholarship has touched on the nature and evolution of these arguments. Predominantly British primary sources illustrate that the British Museum has persisted in retaining the marbles and bronzes because they benefit world culture by remaining in a major international museum. Analyzing the objects' acquisitions and the history of their repatriation debates demonstrate what may be the cause for successful and unsuccessful repatriation requests. Immoral or illegal circumstances of acquisition certainly play a part in increasing chances that objects are sent back to where they were taken. More significantly, how culturally valuable an institution believes objects are to their collection and visitors also determine the outcome of repatriation decisions.

ISBN: 9798516067464Subjects--Topical Terms:

516518
History.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Public discourse

A History of the British Museum's Repatriation Debates of the Parthenon Marbles and Benin Bronzes.
LDR:03552nmm a2200409 4500 001 2348385
005 20220908125732.5
008 241004s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798516067464
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28539938
035 $a AAI28539938
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Waltman, Katie Lynn. $3 3687727
245 1 0 $a A History of the British Museum's Repatriation Debates of the Parthenon Marbles and Benin Bronzes.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 80 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01.
500 $a Advisor: Beasly, Edward.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--San Diego State University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a For the last two centuries, much of the ancient Parthenon marble sculptures have been housed in the British Museum. For the past century, the museum has also displayed bronzes from Africa's western coastal Benin region. These cultural objects have been part of repatriation debates in Britain for several decades. Many have argued that the objects should stay in the museum, as it promotes education of different cultures and civilizations. Others oppose on the grounds that the objects were stolen and belong to the country from which they originated. Since the early nineteenth century, British newspapers have reflected the marbles' repatriation debates. They reveal the rationale of why the objects have stayed in the British Museum despite ongoing controversy. A British Parliamentary report from 1816 also provides detailed analyses of the marbles' acquisition and their artistic integrity, which became a basis for their benefit to Britain's cultural arts. Additional Parliamentary reports and newspapers have also provided details about the restitution debates of and claims for the Benin bronzes. A chronological narrative of the two different cultural objects illustrates how the debates and the institutional responses to those debates progressed over many decades. One can identify how and why opinions and reactions to repatriation arguments unfolded over time, and how they varied between the objects during the same time. Although the museum's retention of the marbles and bronzes have been involved in major discussions for decades, very little scholarship has touched on the nature and evolution of these arguments. Predominantly British primary sources illustrate that the British Museum has persisted in retaining the marbles and bronzes because they benefit world culture by remaining in a major international museum. Analyzing the objects' acquisitions and the history of their repatriation debates demonstrate what may be the cause for successful and unsuccessful repatriation requests. Immoral or illegal circumstances of acquisition certainly play a part in increasing chances that objects are sent back to where they were taken. More significantly, how culturally valuable an institution believes objects are to their collection and visitors also determine the outcome of repatriation decisions.
590 $a School code: 0220.
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
650 4 $a Cultural anthropology. $3 2122764
650 4 $a Museum studies. $3 2122775
650 4 $a Archaeology. $3 558412
653 $a Public discourse
653 $a Acquisitions
653 $a Parliamentary reports
653 $a Newspapers
653 $a Restitution
653 $a Chronological narrative
690 $a 0578
690 $a 0730
690 $a 0324
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a San Diego State University. $b History. $3 2106022
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-01.
790 $a 0220
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28539938