東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Safety and Quality in Lung Radiotherapy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Safety and Quality in Lung Radiotherapy./
作者:	Gilmore, Martyn D. F.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	111 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-02B.
標題:	Patients. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28526411
ISBN:	9798515257637

Safety and Quality in Lung Radiotherapy.
Gilmore, Martyn D. F.

Safety and Quality in Lung Radiotherapy. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 111 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Manchester (United Kingdom), 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Purpose: Investigate and appraise the use of Failure Mode Effect Analysis for routine risk assessment in lung radiotherapy and evaluate the efficacy of Quality Improvement measures introduced within the lung radiotherapy treatment planning process.Methods: A Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) was formed to carry out an FMEA for lung radiotherapy with one member acting as facilitator. A process map and list of failure modes was scored independently and discussed at a meeting where additional modes were identified and agreed. Timings were recorded and local incident data was compared to failure modes to determine the efficacy of the method. For the Quality Improvement (QI) event, three interventions were combined in a single change designed to improve the efficiency of lung radiotherapy plan checking. These were scripting of plan checks; the introduction of electronic questionnaires; and migration of the independent dose calculation task to the plan checker. Timings and plan rejection rates were passively gathered and compared for two separate three-month periods before and after intervention. Incident reports were also analysed to determine the number of false negatives for each period.Results: The FMEA was completed in less than 30 hours with 36 Failure modes identified. Of 38 incidents occurring since April 2017, 13 (34 %) were not predicted by the FMEA and a further four failure modes were introduced as a result. For the QI event, 105 and 96 patients were analysed pre and post intervention respectively and average overall planning timing was reduced by 2.8 hours (p 0.05). No overall change in the volume of incident reporting was found.Conclusions: FMEA can be used for routine risk assessment but should be combined with validation using incident reporting data wherever possible. Similarly, automated scripting, equestionnaires and process redesign can be used to improve efficiency in the planning process but quality improvement should include robust data collection and analysis to determine impact and inform further intervention.

ISBN: 9798515257637Subjects--Topical Terms:

1961957
Patients.

Safety and Quality in Lung Radiotherapy.
LDR:03284nmm a2200409 4500 001 2347773
005 20230509065459.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 241004s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798515257637
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28526411
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Manchester_UK265b5274-ff46-409a-b11b-ac82a2a1e146
035 $a AAI28526411
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gilmore, Martyn D. F. $3 3687071
245 1 0 $a Safety and Quality in Lung Radiotherapy.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 111 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Merchant, Michael.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Manchester (United Kingdom), 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Purpose: Investigate and appraise the use of Failure Mode Effect Analysis for routine risk assessment in lung radiotherapy and evaluate the efficacy of Quality Improvement measures introduced within the lung radiotherapy treatment planning process.Methods: A Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) was formed to carry out an FMEA for lung radiotherapy with one member acting as facilitator. A process map and list of failure modes was scored independently and discussed at a meeting where additional modes were identified and agreed. Timings were recorded and local incident data was compared to failure modes to determine the efficacy of the method. For the Quality Improvement (QI) event, three interventions were combined in a single change designed to improve the efficiency of lung radiotherapy plan checking. These were scripting of plan checks; the introduction of electronic questionnaires; and migration of the independent dose calculation task to the plan checker. Timings and plan rejection rates were passively gathered and compared for two separate three-month periods before and after intervention. Incident reports were also analysed to determine the number of false negatives for each period.Results: The FMEA was completed in less than 30 hours with 36 Failure modes identified. Of 38 incidents occurring since April 2017, 13 (34 %) were not predicted by the FMEA and a further four failure modes were introduced as a result. For the QI event, 105 and 96 patients were analysed pre and post intervention respectively and average overall planning timing was reduced by 2.8 hours (p 0.05). No overall change in the volume of incident reporting was found.Conclusions: FMEA can be used for routine risk assessment but should be combined with validation using incident reporting data wherever possible. Similarly, automated scripting, equestionnaires and process redesign can be used to improve efficiency in the planning process but quality improvement should include robust data collection and analysis to determine impact and inform further intervention.
590 $a School code: 1543.
650 4 $a Patients. $3 1961957
650 4 $a Failure. $3 3561225
650 4 $a Physics. $3 516296
650 4 $a Lung cancer. $3 3561819
650 4 $a Heart attacks. $3 3544977
650 4 $a Cancer therapies. $3 3557730
650 4 $a Health care. $3 2213177
650 4 $a Planning. $3 552734
650 4 $a Intervention. $3 3435307
650 4 $a Adaptation. $3 3562958
650 4 $a Physicists. $3 534202
650 4 $a Biomedical engineering. $3 535387
650 4 $a Dosimetry. $3 3687072
650 4 $a Decision trees. $3 827433
650 4 $a Health physics. $3 3557729
650 4 $a Radiation therapy. $3 3557731
650 4 $a Therapy. $3 3343697
650 4 $a Biophysics. $3 518360
650 4 $a Wood sciences. $3 3168288
650 4 $a Engineering. $3 586835
650 4 $a Morphology. $3 591167
650 4 $a Dissertations & theses. $3 3560115
650 4 $a Efficiency. $3 753744
650 4 $a Academic libraries. $3 635314
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
650 4 $a Methods. $3 3560391
650 4 $a Literature reviews. $3 3559998
650 4 $a Systematic review. $3 3680549
690 $a 0287
690 $a 0541
690 $a 0786
690 $a 0537
690 $a 0605
690 $a 0212
690 $a 0746
690 $a 0513
710 2 $a The University of Manchester (United Kingdom). $3 3422292
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-02B.
790 $a 1543
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28526411