東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

States and Carbon: A Look Ahead.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	States and Carbon: A Look Ahead./
作者:	Osman, Mohammed R.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	684 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-02B.
標題:	Energy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28498353
ISBN:	9798534688337

States and Carbon: A Look Ahead.
Osman, Mohammed R.

States and Carbon: A Look Ahead. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 684 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

To tackle global climate change, the United States must lower its large carbon footprint. An extensive data exploration was undertaken to understand the United States' energy past and future under carbon constraint using a blended mix of historical and simulation data. Historical data was used to study trends at the world stage and state level. Integrated assessment models GCAM and GCAM-USA were used to simulate atmospheric carbon dioxide stabilization scenarios at national and state levels. These simulations projected global carbon dioxide stabilization at light (650-700 PPM), medium (525-600 PPM), and "Deep Blue" high constraint (450-500 PPM) scenarios, along with a ''Business As Usual' projection. Data exploration techniques Principal Component Analysis, Hierarchical Clustering on Principal Components and Multidimensional Analysis were applied over the combined datasets to create state energy signatures for analysis, find groupings, and understand important drivers of technology transition. The historical change from traditional regulation of power to deregulation removed a constraint on power generation, leading to more heterogeneous power systems. In stabilization scenarios 600 PPM and below, limiting emissions placed a constraint on every energy system leading to homogenous energy systems as power sectors had to choose between fewer economically and technically viable technologies. Fossil fuel reliant states saw significant increases in costs under carbon constraint. States with varied energy sources and less carbon intensity experienced less price increases under constraint. Natural gas, wind power and carbon capture & storage technologies were very important to a low carbon future. Fossil fuel use directly declined as the level of carbon constraint increased. Wind power played a prominent role in many state energy systems. Based on groupings analysis four groupings of states emerged "Growth," "U-Shaped," "Convert," and "Give-up." Of note, California, Texas, Florida, Louisiana, and Hawaii were identified as outlier states with unique properties.

ISBN: 9798534688337Subjects--Topical Terms:

876794
Energy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Climate Mitigation

States and Carbon: A Look Ahead.
LDR:03330nmm a2200409 4500 001 2347462
005 20220801062207.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798534688337
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28498353
035 $a AAI28498353
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Osman, Mohammed R. $3 3686710
245 1 0 $a States and Carbon: A Look Ahead.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 684 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Stokes, Gerald.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a To tackle global climate change, the United States must lower its large carbon footprint. An extensive data exploration was undertaken to understand the United States' energy past and future under carbon constraint using a blended mix of historical and simulation data. Historical data was used to study trends at the world stage and state level. Integrated assessment models GCAM and GCAM-USA were used to simulate atmospheric carbon dioxide stabilization scenarios at national and state levels. These simulations projected global carbon dioxide stabilization at light (650-700 PPM), medium (525-600 PPM), and "Deep Blue" high constraint (450-500 PPM) scenarios, along with a ''Business As Usual' projection. Data exploration techniques Principal Component Analysis, Hierarchical Clustering on Principal Components and Multidimensional Analysis were applied over the combined datasets to create state energy signatures for analysis, find groupings, and understand important drivers of technology transition. The historical change from traditional regulation of power to deregulation removed a constraint on power generation, leading to more heterogeneous power systems. In stabilization scenarios 600 PPM and below, limiting emissions placed a constraint on every energy system leading to homogenous energy systems as power sectors had to choose between fewer economically and technically viable technologies. Fossil fuel reliant states saw significant increases in costs under carbon constraint. States with varied energy sources and less carbon intensity experienced less price increases under constraint. Natural gas, wind power and carbon capture & storage technologies were very important to a low carbon future. Fossil fuel use directly declined as the level of carbon constraint increased. Wind power played a prominent role in many state energy systems. Based on groupings analysis four groupings of states emerged "Growth," "U-Shaped," "Convert," and "Give-up." Of note, California, Texas, Florida, Louisiana, and Hawaii were identified as outlier states with unique properties.
590 $a School code: 0771.
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 532993
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
650 4 $a Population. $3 518693
650 4 $a Biodiesel fuels. $3 587935
650 4 $a Datasets. $3 3541416
650 4 $a Electricity distribution. $3 3562889
650 4 $a Biofuels. $3 3562565
650 4 $a Eigen values. $3 3680699
650 4 $a Biomass. $3 1013462
650 4 $a Clustering. $3 3559215
650 4 $a Energy consumption. $3 631630
650 4 $a Natural gas. $3 668611
650 4 $a Principal components analysis. $3 565921
650 4 $a Regulation. $3 3561775
650 4 $a Gases. $3 559387
650 4 $a Electricity generation. $3 3553982
650 4 $a Carbon dioxide. $3 587886
650 4 $a Alternative energy sources. $3 3561089
650 4 $a Renewable resources. $3 3559207
650 4 $a Coal. $3 671197
650 4 $a Hydroelectric power. $3 3686711
653 $a Climate Mitigation
653 $a Data Exploration
653 $a Integrated Assessment Modeling
653 $a Price on Carbon
653 $a Technology Transition
653 $a United States of America
690 $a 0791
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a State University of New York at Stony Brook. $b Technology, Policy, and Innovation. $3 3193034
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-02B.
790 $a 0771
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28498353