東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Human-computer Conflicts in Partially-automated Driving.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Human-computer Conflicts in Partially-automated Driving./
作者:	Miller, David.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	139 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-06B.
標題:	Computer science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28113540
ISBN:	9798698529002

Human-computer Conflicts in Partially-automated Driving.
Miller, David.

Human-computer Conflicts in Partially-automated Driving. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 139 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Computer systems with independent agency that directly act on the environment or influence behaviors and beliefs now mediate our interactions with the ambient environment-influencing what we believe, and what we can do. We will increasingly come in to conflict with such systems, even if they are helping us pursue our superordinate desires. Moral conflicts, without an objectively correct solution, present a complex challenge and demand empirical investigation as to how people will cope with a human-computer moral conflict, so to inform the design of such systems.To study human-computer moral conflicts, a full-vehicle driving simulator was used to elicit naturalistic driver responses in a set of moral conflict situations, where the computer would steer the participant towards greater danger to self, or would protect them by steering towards vulnerable others. Participants fought more strongly against the computer when it pushed participants towards greater danger to themselves and less when it steered them towards vulnerable others when collisions were impossible and time was available to evaluate the situation and act against the computer's actions. In a time-pressured situation where a collision was inevitable, participants fought more strongly against the system when it steered them to strike a person, and less when it pushed them towards a barrier that would injure them. Ultimately, the circumstances of the situation, time available, and level of perceived threat greatly influence fighting against a computer's actions in the moment, and thus systems need to be designed carefully, as supervisory control may be difficult or impossible in critical situations.

ISBN: 9798698529002Subjects--Topical Terms:

523869
Computer science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Human-computer conflicts

Human-computer Conflicts in Partially-automated Driving.
LDR:02859nmm a2200349 4500 001 2346821
005 20220706051259.5
008 241004s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798698529002
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28113540
035 $a (MiAaPQ)STANFORDrm430rg3027
035 $a AAI28113540
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Miller, David. $3 540231
245 1 0 $a Human-computer Conflicts in Partially-automated Driving.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 139 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Reeves, Byron;Bailenson, Jeremy;Harari, Gabriella;Monin, Benoit.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Computer systems with independent agency that directly act on the environment or influence behaviors and beliefs now mediate our interactions with the ambient environment-influencing what we believe, and what we can do. We will increasingly come in to conflict with such systems, even if they are helping us pursue our superordinate desires. Moral conflicts, without an objectively correct solution, present a complex challenge and demand empirical investigation as to how people will cope with a human-computer moral conflict, so to inform the design of such systems.To study human-computer moral conflicts, a full-vehicle driving simulator was used to elicit naturalistic driver responses in a set of moral conflict situations, where the computer would steer the participant towards greater danger to self, or would protect them by steering towards vulnerable others. Participants fought more strongly against the computer when it pushed participants towards greater danger to themselves and less when it steered them towards vulnerable others when collisions were impossible and time was available to evaluate the situation and act against the computer's actions. In a time-pressured situation where a collision was inevitable, participants fought more strongly against the system when it steered them to strike a person, and less when it pushed them towards a barrier that would injure them. Ultimately, the circumstances of the situation, time available, and level of perceived threat greatly influence fighting against a computer's actions in the moment, and thus systems need to be designed carefully, as supervisory control may be difficult or impossible in critical situations.
590 $a School code: 0212.
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 523869
650 4 $a Transportation. $3 555912
653 $a Human-computer conflicts
653 $a Partially-automated driving
653 $a Moral conflict situations
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0709
710 2 $a Stanford University. $3 754827
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-06B.
790 $a 0212
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28113540