語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Crowdsourcing and Engaging Employees in Innovation: Three Field Studies.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Crowdsourcing and Engaging Employees in Innovation: Three Field Studies./
作者:
Jung, Olivia S.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:
142 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International83-02B.
標題:
Health care management. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28497070
ISBN:
9798534680324
Crowdsourcing and Engaging Employees in Innovation: Three Field Studies.
Jung, Olivia S.
Crowdsourcing and Engaging Employees in Innovation: Three Field Studies.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 142 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2021.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
This dissertation examines how crowdsourcing ideas, which opens up the opportunity to innovate, can engage employees to solve organizational problems. Across three field studies, I investigate: employees' responses to being invited to participate in idea generation and selection when such activities are not part of the day-to-day job, the impact of broadening the locus of innovation on existing organizational relationships and practices, and whether employees innovate more when crowdsourcing mechanisms are introduced. In Study/Chapter 1, I posit that organization-wide innovation contests, a vehicle to crowdsource ideas, enable individual learning to become organizational learning. Contests allow employees to share knowledge and ideas for organizational improvement and to evaluate shared ideas through crowd voting. I find that a culture of learning plays a key role in facilitating employee participation in contests. In a cardiac center of an academic hospital (n=1,400) employees who perceived openness to new ideas and psychological safety were more likely to participate in ideation as well as voting. Innovation contests' potential to decentralize innovation and facilitate organizational learning may be greater in an environment that supports learning.In Study/Chapter 2, I partnered with NASA for a qualitative study (n=53) and a field experiment (n=7,455) to understand employees' motivations to engage with a crowdsourcing platform and study the effectiveness of different recognition incentives. Qualitative findings show that the perceived incongruence between crowdsourcing and organizational hierarchy disincentivized employees by creating concerns about the legitimacy of peer-based innovation. Experimental findings show that managerial recognition, the incentive that was congruent with the established hierarchy, significantly increased engagement, possibly by alleviating legitimacy concerns. These findings demonstrate the potential of recognition incentives-when they are aligned with prevalent organizational structure and culture-to assuage employees' negative attitudes towards a new practice.In Study/Chapter 3, I examined whether and how innovation contests could increase employees' general engagement in innovation. In this multi-method study, I first conducted a field experiment with 53 community health centers (CHCs). Half of the randomly treated CHCs crowdsourced all employees for ideas to improve patient care. After the experiment, I interviewed 175 people spanning roles and levels from the same field sites to explore how and under what conditions this intervention works. My experimental findings evince that the intervention increased employees' engagement in innovation by more than 35 percent, two months following the intervention. My qualitative findings suggest that the intervention (1) exposed managers to the usefulness of soliciting employee ideas, prompting them to keep soliciting ideas and (2) spurred employees to prioritize innovating on top of their day-to-day work. The intervention was particularly effective in organizations where employee ideas were not proactively sought prior to the intervention. This study illustrates that a crowdsourcing intervention that introduces an open and structured approach to innovation can motivate manager-employee communication in new ways.
ISBN: 9798534680324Subjects--Topical Terms:
2122906
Health care management.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Crowdsourcing
Crowdsourcing and Engaging Employees in Innovation: Three Field Studies.
LDR
:04526nmm a2200373 4500
001
2346419
005
20230315102205.5
006
m o d
007
cr#unu||||||||
008
241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798534680324
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28497070
035
$a
AAI28497070
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Jung, Olivia S.
$0
(orcid)0000-0001-9998-6022
$3
3685508
245
1 0
$a
Crowdsourcing and Engaging Employees in Innovation: Three Field Studies.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2021
300
$a
142 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisor: Edmondson, Amy C.;Lakhani, Karim R.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2021.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
This dissertation examines how crowdsourcing ideas, which opens up the opportunity to innovate, can engage employees to solve organizational problems. Across three field studies, I investigate: employees' responses to being invited to participate in idea generation and selection when such activities are not part of the day-to-day job, the impact of broadening the locus of innovation on existing organizational relationships and practices, and whether employees innovate more when crowdsourcing mechanisms are introduced. In Study/Chapter 1, I posit that organization-wide innovation contests, a vehicle to crowdsource ideas, enable individual learning to become organizational learning. Contests allow employees to share knowledge and ideas for organizational improvement and to evaluate shared ideas through crowd voting. I find that a culture of learning plays a key role in facilitating employee participation in contests. In a cardiac center of an academic hospital (n=1,400) employees who perceived openness to new ideas and psychological safety were more likely to participate in ideation as well as voting. Innovation contests' potential to decentralize innovation and facilitate organizational learning may be greater in an environment that supports learning.In Study/Chapter 2, I partnered with NASA for a qualitative study (n=53) and a field experiment (n=7,455) to understand employees' motivations to engage with a crowdsourcing platform and study the effectiveness of different recognition incentives. Qualitative findings show that the perceived incongruence between crowdsourcing and organizational hierarchy disincentivized employees by creating concerns about the legitimacy of peer-based innovation. Experimental findings show that managerial recognition, the incentive that was congruent with the established hierarchy, significantly increased engagement, possibly by alleviating legitimacy concerns. These findings demonstrate the potential of recognition incentives-when they are aligned with prevalent organizational structure and culture-to assuage employees' negative attitudes towards a new practice.In Study/Chapter 3, I examined whether and how innovation contests could increase employees' general engagement in innovation. In this multi-method study, I first conducted a field experiment with 53 community health centers (CHCs). Half of the randomly treated CHCs crowdsourced all employees for ideas to improve patient care. After the experiment, I interviewed 175 people spanning roles and levels from the same field sites to explore how and under what conditions this intervention works. My experimental findings evince that the intervention increased employees' engagement in innovation by more than 35 percent, two months following the intervention. My qualitative findings suggest that the intervention (1) exposed managers to the usefulness of soliciting employee ideas, prompting them to keep soliciting ideas and (2) spurred employees to prioritize innovating on top of their day-to-day work. The intervention was particularly effective in organizations where employee ideas were not proactively sought prior to the intervention. This study illustrates that a crowdsourcing intervention that introduces an open and structured approach to innovation can motivate manager-employee communication in new ways.
590
$a
School code: 0084.
650
4
$a
Health care management.
$3
2122906
650
4
$a
Problem solving.
$3
516855
650
4
$a
Polls & surveys.
$3
3546576
650
4
$a
Managers.
$2
gtt
$3
1457937
650
4
$a
Health care policy.
$3
3550686
650
4
$a
Physicians.
$3
667368
650
4
$a
Hospitals.
$3
616081
650
4
$a
Citizenship.
$3
530862
650
4
$a
Health facilities.
$3
1576202
650
4
$a
Feedback.
$3
677181
650
4
$a
Nurses.
$3
617628
650
4
$a
Innovations.
$3
754112
650
4
$a
Patients.
$3
1961957
650
4
$a
Research methodology.
$3
3559994
650
4
$a
Perceptions.
$3
3435328
650
4
$a
Hypotheses.
$3
3560118
650
4
$a
Experiments.
$3
525909
650
4
$a
Participation.
$3
1555180
650
4
$a
Knowledge.
$3
872758
650
4
$a
Medical research.
$2
bicssc
$3
1556686
650
4
$a
Decentralization.
$3
3562905
650
4
$a
Creativity.
$3
605632
650
4
$a
Crowdsourcing.
$3
3377825
653
$a
Crowdsourcing
653
$a
Field experiment
653
$a
Frontline employees
653
$a
Innovation
653
$a
Mixed methods
690
$a
0769
710
2
$a
Harvard University.
$b
Health Policy.
$3
2093139
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
83-02B.
790
$a
0084
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2021
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28497070
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9468857
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入