東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Acceptance Versus Distraction as Coping Strategies for Acute Pain and Pain-Induced Alcohol Urge and Approach Inclinations.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Acceptance Versus Distraction as Coping Strategies for Acute Pain and Pain-Induced Alcohol Urge and Approach Inclinations./
作者:	Moskal, Dezarie.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	94 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-02B.
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10599344
ISBN:	9798535510873

Acceptance Versus Distraction as Coping Strategies for Acute Pain and Pain-Induced Alcohol Urge and Approach Inclinations.
Moskal, Dezarie.

Acceptance Versus Distraction as Coping Strategies for Acute Pain and Pain-Induced Alcohol Urge and Approach Inclinations. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 94 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Excessive alcohol use is a leading cause of preventable death and disproportionately affects people with pain. Experimental research has identified pain as a determinant of alcohol use proxies that has its influence via negative affect (i.e. mediation effect). Although experimental research has shown that acceptance coping reduces pain-related negative affect, such effects have not been examined within the context of the pain and alcohol relationship. The purpose of this study was to test acceptance coping (vs. distraction) as a moderator of the previously established mediation model. Based on a randomized 2x2 between-subjects repeated-measures experimental design, pain-free hazardous drinkers (N = 135) were randomly assigned to receive acceptance or distraction coping training. They were asked to use the strategy while receiving a painful or non-painful acute stimulus. It was hypothesized that the effects of pain condition on negative affect would be weaker among those who received acceptance training, which would, in turn, result in lower ratings on alcohol use proxy measures vs. those receiving distraction. The indirect effects of coping condition were non-significant and there were no pain condition X coping condition effects on negative affect. Given this, the moderator was removed, and a simple mediation model was tested. Results showed significant indirect effects for alcohol urge through negative affect. Pain condition predicted increases in negative affect, but negative affect did not effect alcohol use proxies. Results suggest that there are no differences between acceptance and distraction coping in ameliorating the effects of acute pain on negative affect and alcohol use proxies. The previous mediation model was partially replicated. Findings provide information that may accelerate the design of interventions to curtail drinking for pain-coping by better understanding the utility of acceptance training and the pain and alcohol relation.

ISBN: 9798535510873Subjects--Topical Terms:

524863
Clinical psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Acceptance training

Acceptance Versus Distraction as Coping Strategies for Acute Pain and Pain-Induced Alcohol Urge and Approach Inclinations.
LDR:03193nmm a2200385 4500 001 2346310
005 20230315102133.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798535510873
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10599344
035 $a AAI10599344
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Moskal, Dezarie. $3 3685388
245 1 0 $a Acceptance Versus Distraction as Coping Strategies for Acute Pain and Pain-Induced Alcohol Urge and Approach Inclinations.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 94 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Maisto, Stephen A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Excessive alcohol use is a leading cause of preventable death and disproportionately affects people with pain. Experimental research has identified pain as a determinant of alcohol use proxies that has its influence via negative affect (i.e. mediation effect). Although experimental research has shown that acceptance coping reduces pain-related negative affect, such effects have not been examined within the context of the pain and alcohol relationship. The purpose of this study was to test acceptance coping (vs. distraction) as a moderator of the previously established mediation model. Based on a randomized 2x2 between-subjects repeated-measures experimental design, pain-free hazardous drinkers (N = 135) were randomly assigned to receive acceptance or distraction coping training. They were asked to use the strategy while receiving a painful or non-painful acute stimulus. It was hypothesized that the effects of pain condition on negative affect would be weaker among those who received acceptance training, which would, in turn, result in lower ratings on alcohol use proxy measures vs. those receiving distraction. The indirect effects of coping condition were non-significant and there were no pain condition X coping condition effects on negative affect. Given this, the moderator was removed, and a simple mediation model was tested. Results showed significant indirect effects for alcohol urge through negative affect. Pain condition predicted increases in negative affect, but negative affect did not effect alcohol use proxies. Results suggest that there are no differences between acceptance and distraction coping in ameliorating the effects of acute pain on negative affect and alcohol use proxies. The previous mediation model was partially replicated. Findings provide information that may accelerate the design of interventions to curtail drinking for pain-coping by better understanding the utility of acceptance training and the pain and alcohol relation.
590 $a School code: 0659.
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Physiological psychology. $3 2144820
650 4 $a Laboratories. $3 531588
650 4 $a Cold. $3 560283
650 4 $a Behavior. $3 532476
650 4 $a Software. $2 gtt. $3 619355
650 4 $a Students. $3 756581
650 4 $a Practice exercises. $3 3685389
650 4 $a Intervention. $3 3435307
650 4 $a Questionnaires. $3 529568
650 4 $a Mindfulness. $3 2205473
650 4 $a Marijuana. $3 645285
650 4 $a Narcotics. $3 754737
650 4 $a Coping. $2 gtt $3 919950
650 4 $a Participation. $3 1555180
650 4 $a Alcohol use. $3 1973975
650 4 $a Drug use. $3 3684378
650 4 $a Medical research. $2 bicssc $3 1556686
650 4 $a Flexibility. $3 3560705
650 4 $a Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. $3 3685390
650 4 $a Pain. $3 533714
650 4 $a Addictive behaviors. $3 3563047
650 4 $a Anxiety. $3 520056
653 $a Acceptance training
653 $a Alcohol
653 $a Physical pain
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0623
690 $a 0989
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a Syracuse University. $b Psychology. $3 3176212
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-02B.
790 $a 0659
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10599344