東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Study of Language Ideologies and Language Practices in an Intensive English Program Class.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Study of Language Ideologies and Language Practices in an Intensive English Program Class./
作者:	Carvajal Regidor, Marta E.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	129 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-08A.
標題:	Curriculum development. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28262818
ISBN:	9798569971206

A Study of Language Ideologies and Language Practices in an Intensive English Program Class.
Carvajal Regidor, Marta E.

A Study of Language Ideologies and Language Practices in an Intensive English Program Class. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 129 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kansas, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation investigates the language ideologies and language practices that language users encounter and engage with in an Intensive English Program (IEP) class. The purpose of examining language ideologies (these include ideologies about language, language use, language learning, language practices, and language teaching) and language practices is to explore how the latter might be shaped or influenced by the former. The study adopts a case study design that implements classroom observations and interviews. Two categories of data were collected-classroom observations and two sets of semi-structured interviews (teacher interview and student interviews). The three data sets were coded and analyzed using a thematic analysis.The findings suggest that the language practices of students and the teaching practices of the instructor were influenced by two interacting ideologies: 1) a monolingual language ideology and 2) an ideology of linguistic prescriptivism. However, the analyses suggest that even though monolingual and prescriptivist ideologies are present and influence how language use, language learning, language teaching, and language as a whole are conceptualized, students use language and position themselves as agentive language users in ways that transgress prescriptive and structural notions of language and its teaching and learning. In the end, these findings hold several implications for language teaching and learning. 1) By expanding conceptualizations of language, English language education can better highlight and prioritize the fluid and emergent language practices of the students. This can create a more inclusive language learning experience in that the students serve as models for classroom pedagogy. 2) More opportunities for the use of language practices such as translanguaging and code-meshing in the classroom can be made available. More importantly, explicit authorizations of practices such as translanguaging can further facilitate the incorporation of students' funds of knowledge. 3) The various language ideologies in IEP classrooms and higher education need to be explicitly addressed during teacher training programs to help teachers find ways to empower their students. Additionally, these language ideologies should also be explicitly addressed with IEP students throughout their language learning experiences. This can help students become more cognizant of these circulating ideologies and the impact they can have on their learning and language use.

ISBN: 9798569971206Subjects--Topical Terms:

684418
Curriculum development.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Language ideologies

A Study of Language Ideologies and Language Practices in an Intensive English Program Class.
LDR:03848nmm a2200421 4500 001 2345878
005 20220613064805.5
008 241004s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798569971206
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28262818
035 $a AAI28262818
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Carvajal Regidor, Marta E. $3 3684889
245 1 0 $a A Study of Language Ideologies and Language Practices in an Intensive English Program Class.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 129 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Thomas, M'Balia;Hallman, Heidi.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kansas, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a This dissertation investigates the language ideologies and language practices that language users encounter and engage with in an Intensive English Program (IEP) class. The purpose of examining language ideologies (these include ideologies about language, language use, language learning, language practices, and language teaching) and language practices is to explore how the latter might be shaped or influenced by the former. The study adopts a case study design that implements classroom observations and interviews. Two categories of data were collected-classroom observations and two sets of semi-structured interviews (teacher interview and student interviews). The three data sets were coded and analyzed using a thematic analysis.The findings suggest that the language practices of students and the teaching practices of the instructor were influenced by two interacting ideologies: 1) a monolingual language ideology and 2) an ideology of linguistic prescriptivism. However, the analyses suggest that even though monolingual and prescriptivist ideologies are present and influence how language use, language learning, language teaching, and language as a whole are conceptualized, students use language and position themselves as agentive language users in ways that transgress prescriptive and structural notions of language and its teaching and learning. In the end, these findings hold several implications for language teaching and learning. 1) By expanding conceptualizations of language, English language education can better highlight and prioritize the fluid and emergent language practices of the students. This can create a more inclusive language learning experience in that the students serve as models for classroom pedagogy. 2) More opportunities for the use of language practices such as translanguaging and code-meshing in the classroom can be made available. More importantly, explicit authorizations of practices such as translanguaging can further facilitate the incorporation of students' funds of knowledge. 3) The various language ideologies in IEP classrooms and higher education need to be explicitly addressed during teacher training programs to help teachers find ways to empower their students. Additionally, these language ideologies should also be explicitly addressed with IEP students throughout their language learning experiences. This can help students become more cognizant of these circulating ideologies and the impact they can have on their learning and language use.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
650 4 $a Bilingual education. $3 2122778
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
653 $a Language ideologies
653 $a Language practices
653 $a TESOL
653 $a Monolingual
653 $a Prescriptivist ideologies
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0282
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0441
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Curriculum and Teaching. $3 1020314
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-08A.
790 $a 0099
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28262818