東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Experimental Examination of Incentive and Sorting Effects of Pay-For-Performance on Creative Performance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Experimental Examination of Incentive and Sorting Effects of Pay-For-Performance on Creative Performance./
作者:	Kim, Ji Hyun.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	112 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-11B.
標題:	Business administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29169661
ISBN:	9798438730910

An Experimental Examination of Incentive and Sorting Effects of Pay-For-Performance on Creative Performance.
Kim, Ji Hyun.

An Experimental Examination of Incentive and Sorting Effects of Pay-For-Performance on Creative Performance. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 112 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

There is a longstanding debate about whether pay-for-performance (PFP) enhances or undermines creative performance. Traditional motivation and revised creativity theories suggest that PFP and intrinsic task interest combine additively to enhance creative performance, whereas cognitive evaluation theory (CET) and self-determination theory (SDT) posit an undermining effect of PFP on task interest and thus on intrinsic motivation and creative performance. To help resolve these conflicting predictions and provide a more comprehensive understanding of how and when PFP influences creative performance, the current study incorporated both incentive and sorting mechanisms of PFP, varying strengths of PFP, and task autonomy as a key moderator. A novel laboratory experiment was designed to capture key elements of workplace contexts, including in the design of the creative tasks, the choice of PFP strength based on benchmarking of U.S. companies' practices, and allowing participants to sort into different pay conditions, consistent with the opportunity for mobility in the labor market. Results showed that, through both incentive and sorting mechanisms, high PFP intensity more strongly enhanced creative performance than did low PFP intensity and both were superior to fixed pay. Importantly, task autonomy positively moderated the PFP-creative performance relationship such that creative performance under PFP increased much more under higher task autonomy. Finally, the difference in creative performance under PFP versus fixed pay was greater when participants were allowed to sort into their preferred pay conditions than when they worked only under randomly assigned pay conditions (typical in past research on PFP and creativity). Several theoretical and practical implications and future directions are discussed.

ISBN: 9798438730910Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168311
Business administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Pay-for-performance

An Experimental Examination of Incentive and Sorting Effects of Pay-For-Performance on Creative Performance.
LDR:03054nmm a2200373 4500 001 2345781
005 20220613063818.5
008 241004s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798438730910
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29169661
035 $a AAI29169661
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kim, Ji Hyun. $3 1026422
245 1 3 $a An Experimental Examination of Incentive and Sorting Effects of Pay-For-Performance on Creative Performance.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 112 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Gerhart, Barry.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a There is a longstanding debate about whether pay-for-performance (PFP) enhances or undermines creative performance. Traditional motivation and revised creativity theories suggest that PFP and intrinsic task interest combine additively to enhance creative performance, whereas cognitive evaluation theory (CET) and self-determination theory (SDT) posit an undermining effect of PFP on task interest and thus on intrinsic motivation and creative performance. To help resolve these conflicting predictions and provide a more comprehensive understanding of how and when PFP influences creative performance, the current study incorporated both incentive and sorting mechanisms of PFP, varying strengths of PFP, and task autonomy as a key moderator. A novel laboratory experiment was designed to capture key elements of workplace contexts, including in the design of the creative tasks, the choice of PFP strength based on benchmarking of U.S. companies' practices, and allowing participants to sort into different pay conditions, consistent with the opportunity for mobility in the labor market. Results showed that, through both incentive and sorting mechanisms, high PFP intensity more strongly enhanced creative performance than did low PFP intensity and both were superior to fixed pay. Importantly, task autonomy positively moderated the PFP-creative performance relationship such that creative performance under PFP increased much more under higher task autonomy. Finally, the difference in creative performance under PFP versus fixed pay was greater when participants were allowed to sort into their preferred pay conditions than when they worked only under randomly assigned pay conditions (typical in past research on PFP and creativity). Several theoretical and practical implications and future directions are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 3168311
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
653 $a Pay-for-performance
653 $a Different pay conditions
653 $a PFP-creative performance relationship
653 $a Task autonomy
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $b Business. $3 2095187
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-11B.
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29169661