東華大學圖書館 |

Participatory Visual Researchers Reflect on Youth-Led Policy Dialogue.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Participatory Visual Researchers Reflect on Youth-Led Policy Dialogue./
作者:	Raissadat, Haleh.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	304 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-10B.
標題:	Womens health. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29043390
ISBN:	9798209930921

Participatory Visual Researchers Reflect on Youth-Led Policy Dialogue.
Raissadat, Haleh.

Participatory Visual Researchers Reflect on Youth-Led Policy Dialogue. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 304 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--McGill University (Canada), 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Recognizing youth as "knowers and as actors" (Oakley, 1994, p. 23) calls for including them in policy dialogue and in finding solutions to social issues that impact them. In recent decades, participatory visual methodologies (PVMs) have been acknowledged for their value in engaging youth participants in the research process, including the analysis of visual data, empowering participants, addressing sensitive and stigmatized issues, democratizing the research process, including participants in policy dialogue, and addressing social issues.To date, there remains a gap in tracking the outcomes of participatory visual research projects, particularly in the context of the question "Does anything change?" My research question specifically asks, "How might participatory visual methods contribute to youth-led from-the-ground-up policy dialogue?" In an attempt to respond to this research question, I framed my literature review within two broad areas of study: (1) grassroots from-the-ground-up policy dialogue and (2) participatory visual methodologies.As part of my methodology, I used purposive sampling to work with six academic scholars who carry out participatory visual research with young people across a variety of policy areas, in both the Global North and Global South. I conducted in-depth interviews with them using Mitchell et al.'s (2017) go-ask approach, drawing on Gubrium and Harper's (2013) notion of talking with experts in the field of participatory visual research. Adapting Miller et al.'s (2017) approach of being in conversation with, I worked with the interviews through a process I termed creating compositions. The compositions are meant to capture the nuances of the interactions between and among the researchers, the participants, the participatory visual research process, and the desired change itself. Three features emerged from the compositions that could inform existing efforts to build a more comprehensive approach towards engaging young people in policy dialogue and social change: (1) youth engagement, (2) the idea of making public, and (3) the notion of from-the-ground-up policy dialogue.This research sheds light on the importance of alternative approaches to knowledge sharing and knowledge production. It also calls for the development of methodological frameworks that allow for monitoring the "afterlife" (Mitchell et al., 2017, p. 184) of participatory visual research projects and their long-term impacts on the lives of young people. To ensure the sustainability of the impact of participatory visual research projects, frameworks need to include the ways in which young people can practice activism and can practice it safely. Based on my study, I conclude by recommending that researchers broaden their group of participants in the research inquiry to include young people who have had previous experience of working with PVMs; that they involve participatory visual researchers with a more diverse background, like, for example, those who work outside the academy (such as in NGOs, schools, and community organizations); and that they include policymakers or stakeholders who have viewed artifacts produced by young people in participatory visual workshops.

ISBN: 9798209930921Subjects--Topical Terms:

3562508
Womens health.

Participatory Visual Researchers Reflect on Youth-Led Policy Dialogue.
LDR:08197nmm a2200469 4500 001 2345743
005 20220613063809.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798209930921
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29043390
035 $a (MiAaPQ)McGill_8049g972f
035 $a AAI29043390
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Raissadat, Haleh. $3 3684739
245 1 0 $a Participatory Visual Researchers Reflect on Youth-Led Policy Dialogue.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 304 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Mitchell, Claudia.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--McGill University (Canada), 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Recognizing youth as "knowers and as actors" (Oakley, 1994, p. 23) calls for including them in policy dialogue and in finding solutions to social issues that impact them. In recent decades, participatory visual methodologies (PVMs) have been acknowledged for their value in engaging youth participants in the research process, including the analysis of visual data, empowering participants, addressing sensitive and stigmatized issues, democratizing the research process, including participants in policy dialogue, and addressing social issues.To date, there remains a gap in tracking the outcomes of participatory visual research projects, particularly in the context of the question "Does anything change?" My research question specifically asks, "How might participatory visual methods contribute to youth-led from-the-ground-up policy dialogue?" In an attempt to respond to this research question, I framed my literature review within two broad areas of study: (1) grassroots from-the-ground-up policy dialogue and (2) participatory visual methodologies.As part of my methodology, I used purposive sampling to work with six academic scholars who carry out participatory visual research with young people across a variety of policy areas, in both the Global North and Global South. I conducted in-depth interviews with them using Mitchell et al.'s (2017) go-ask approach, drawing on Gubrium and Harper's (2013) notion of talking with experts in the field of participatory visual research. Adapting Miller et al.'s (2017) approach of being in conversation with, I worked with the interviews through a process I termed creating compositions. The compositions are meant to capture the nuances of the interactions between and among the researchers, the participants, the participatory visual research process, and the desired change itself. Three features emerged from the compositions that could inform existing efforts to build a more comprehensive approach towards engaging young people in policy dialogue and social change: (1) youth engagement, (2) the idea of making public, and (3) the notion of from-the-ground-up policy dialogue.This research sheds light on the importance of alternative approaches to knowledge sharing and knowledge production. It also calls for the development of methodological frameworks that allow for monitoring the "afterlife" (Mitchell et al., 2017, p. 184) of participatory visual research projects and their long-term impacts on the lives of young people. To ensure the sustainability of the impact of participatory visual research projects, frameworks need to include the ways in which young people can practice activism and can practice it safely. Based on my study, I conclude by recommending that researchers broaden their group of participants in the research inquiry to include young people who have had previous experience of working with PVMs; that they involve participatory visual researchers with a more diverse background, like, for example, those who work outside the academy (such as in NGOs, schools, and community organizations); and that they include policymakers or stakeholders who have viewed artifacts produced by young people in participatory visual workshops.
520 $a Reconnaitre les jeunes comme « des connaisseurs et des acteurs » (Oakley, 1994, p. 23) exige de les inclure dans le dialogue sur les politiques et dans la recherche de solutions aux problemes sociaux qui les touchent. Au cours des dernieres decennies, les methodologies visuelles participatives ont ete reconnues pour leur valeur dans la participation des jeunes participants au processus de recherche, y compris l'analyse des donnees visuelles, l'autonomisation des participants, le traitement des questions sensibles et stigmatisees, la democratisation du processus de recherche, y compris les participants au dialogue sur les politiques, et la resolution des problemes sociaux.A ce jour, il subsiste une lacune dans le suivi des resultats des projets de recherche visuelle participative, en particulier dans le contexte de la question « Est-ce que quelque chose change? » Ma question de recherche pose specifiquement la question suivante : « Comment les methodes visuelles participatives pourraient-elles contribuer au dialogue sur les politiques mene par les jeunes a partir de la base? » Pour tenter de repondre a cette question de recherche, j'ai encadre ma revue de la litterature dans deux grands domaines d'etude : (1) le dialogue sur les politiques a partir de la base et (2) les methodologies visuelles participatives.Dans le cadre de ma methodologie, j'ai utilise l'echantillonnage teleologique pour travailler avec six universitaires qui effectuent des recherches visuelles participatives avec des jeunes dans divers domaines politiques, a la fois dans le Nord et le Sud. J'ai mene des entrevues approfondies avec eux en utilisant l'approche de demande de Mitchell et coll. (2017), en m'inspirant de la notion de Gubrium et Harper (2013) de parler avec des experts dans le domaine de la recherche visuelle participative. Adaptant l'approche de Miller et coll. (2017) d'etre en conversation avec, j'ai travaille avec les entrevues a travers un processus que j'ai appele la creation de compositions. Les compositions sont destinees a capturer les nuances des interactions entre et parmi les chercheurs, les participants, le processus de recherche visuelle participative et le changement souhaite lui-meme. Trois caracteristiques se sont degagees des compositions qui pourraient eclairer les efforts existants visant a elaborer une approche plus globale pour faire participer les jeunes au dialogue politique et au changement social : (1) l'engagement des jeunes, (2) l'idee de rendre public, et (3) la notion de dialogue politique a partir de la base.Cette recherche met en lumiere l'importance d'approches de rechange au partage et a la production des connaissances. Il appelle egalement a l'elaboration de cadres methodologiques permettant de suivre « l'au-dela » (Mitchell et al., 2017, p. 184) des projets de recherche visuelle participative et leurs impacts a long terme sur la vie des jeunes. Pour assurer la durabilite de l'impact des projets de recherche visuelle participative, les cadres doivent inclure les facons dont les jeunes peuvent pratiquer l'activisme et le pratiquer en toute securite. Sur la base de mon etude, je conclus en recommandant que les chercheurs elargissent leur groupe de participants a l'enquete de recherche pour inclure les jeunes qui ont deja travaille avec des MVP; qu'ils impliquent des chercheurs visuels participatifs ayant un passe plus diversifie, comme, par exemple, ceux qui travaillent en dehors de l'academie (comme dans des ONG, des ecoles et des organisations communautaires); et qu'ils incluent des decideurs ou des parties prenantes qui ont vu des artefacts produits par des jeunes dans des ateliers visuels participatifs.
590 $a School code: 0781.
650 4 $a Womens health. $3 3562508
650 4 $a Photographs. $3 627415
650 4 $a Political activism. $2 bicssc $3 2079578
650 4 $a Reproductive health. $3 878988
650 4 $a Social change. $3 526824
650 4 $a Storytelling. $3 535033
650 4 $a Documentary films. $3 540573
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Feminism. $3 526785
650 4 $a Young adults. $3 598212
650 4 $a Social justice. $3 526845
650 4 $a Autobiographies. $3 516577
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Sexuality. $3 816197
650 4 $a Farms. $3 3221144
650 4 $a Empowerment. $2 lcstt $3 3266631
650 4 $a Girls. $3 572082
650 4 $a Children & youth. $3 3541389
650 4 $a Rural areas. $3 3560074
650 4 $a Consciousness. $3 517079
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Tropical diseases. $3 3559964
650 4 $a Agriculture. $3 518588
650 4 $a Biographies. $3 795061
650 4 $a Epidemiology. $3 568544
650 4 $a Film studies. $3 2122736
650 4 $a Gender studies. $3 2122708
650 4 $a Individual & family studies. $3 2122770
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
650 4 $a Womens studies. $3 2122688
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0211
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0473
690 $a 0304
690 $a 0766
690 $a 0900
690 $a 0733
690 $a 0628
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0646
690 $a 0453
710 2 $a McGill University (Canada). $3 1018122
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-10B.
790 $a 0781
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29043390