東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Creativity in the Ontario Elementary Curriculum 1853-2018: A Historically Situated Document Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Creativity in the Ontario Elementary Curriculum 1853-2018: A Historically Situated Document Analysis./
作者:	Strong, Trevor Owen.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	335 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-02A.
標題:	Teaching. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28664136
ISBN:	9798522955465

Creativity in the Ontario Elementary Curriculum 1853-2018: A Historically Situated Document Analysis.
Strong, Trevor Owen.

Creativity in the Ontario Elementary Curriculum 1853-2018: A Historically Situated Document Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 335 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Queen's University (Canada), 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this study is to provide descriptions of conceptions related to creativity in the context of public elementary education in Ontario through an examination of Ontario curriculum documents from 1853 until 2018. Analysis of these documents was informed by a historical understanding of conceptions of creativity as well as the use of an interpretive framework with regards to the ideological purposes behind the curricula. It proposes that there are five conceptions of creativity that have been dominant during different periods in the history of the Ontario elementary curriculum. The first is Divine Creation (1853-1884), where creativity was viewed as property of God alone, and students, therefore, were not encouraged to be creative. The second is Froebelian Creativeness (1885-1936), in which students were seen as having an inner essence which needed to unfold according to its own nature in accordance with "the great Froebelian doctrine of creativeness." The third is Creative Experience (1937-1974), where students were viewed as being actively engaged in creative activities as a means of self-expression and in solving social problems. The fourth is Creative Thinking Skills (1975-2002), where students were to develop creative skills to help them compete in the global marketplace. The most recent period is that of Critical and Creative Thinking Skills and/or Processes (2003-2018), in which creativity continued to be primarily conceived as a skill for students to develop for economic reasons, but which also emphasized the importance of being critical of the creations of others. At the policy level, this research hopes to provide a basis for curriculum developers and ministry officials to understand differences in conceptions of creativity and to help generate curricula with greater conceptual consistency according to the curriculum ideology behind them. For teachers, this research will provide tools that will help them understand and incorporate conceptions of creativity in their classrooms.

ISBN: 9798522955465Subjects--Topical Terms:

517098
Teaching.

Creativity in the Ontario Elementary Curriculum 1853-2018: A Historically Situated Document Analysis.
LDR:03359nmm a2200469 4500 001 2345690
005 20220613063756.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798522955465
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28664136
035 $a (MiAaPQ)QueensUCan_197428864
035 $a AAI28664136
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Strong, Trevor Owen. $3 3684678
245 1 0 $a Creativity in the Ontario Elementary Curriculum 1853-2018: A Historically Situated Document Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 335 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Christou, Theodore.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Queen's University (Canada), 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this study is to provide descriptions of conceptions related to creativity in the context of public elementary education in Ontario through an examination of Ontario curriculum documents from 1853 until 2018. Analysis of these documents was informed by a historical understanding of conceptions of creativity as well as the use of an interpretive framework with regards to the ideological purposes behind the curricula. It proposes that there are five conceptions of creativity that have been dominant during different periods in the history of the Ontario elementary curriculum. The first is Divine Creation (1853-1884), where creativity was viewed as property of God alone, and students, therefore, were not encouraged to be creative. The second is Froebelian Creativeness (1885-1936), in which students were seen as having an inner essence which needed to unfold according to its own nature in accordance with "the great Froebelian doctrine of creativeness." The third is Creative Experience (1937-1974), where students were viewed as being actively engaged in creative activities as a means of self-expression and in solving social problems. The fourth is Creative Thinking Skills (1975-2002), where students were to develop creative skills to help them compete in the global marketplace. The most recent period is that of Critical and Creative Thinking Skills and/or Processes (2003-2018), in which creativity continued to be primarily conceived as a skill for students to develop for economic reasons, but which also emphasized the importance of being critical of the creations of others. At the policy level, this research hopes to provide a basis for curriculum developers and ministry officials to understand differences in conceptions of creativity and to help generate curricula with greater conceptual consistency according to the curriculum ideology behind them. For teachers, this research will provide tools that will help them understand and incorporate conceptions of creativity in their classrooms.
590 $a School code: 0283.
650 4 $a Teaching. $3 517098
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
650 4 $a Students. $3 756581
650 4 $a Culture. $3 517003
650 4 $a Ideology. $3 521772
650 4 $a Pragmatism. $3 518780
650 4 $a Clergy. $3 2144876
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Traditions. $3 3562097
650 4 $a Core curriculum. $3 3559991
650 4 $a Teachers. $3 529573
650 4 $a Public schools. $3 542577
650 4 $a Innovations. $3 754112
650 4 $a Elementary schools. $3 644175
650 4 $a Society. $3 700566
650 4 $a Educational theory. $3 3435806
650 4 $a Social studies. $3 642260
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
650 4 $a Art. $3 516292
650 4 $a Creativity. $3 605632
650 4 $a Critical thinking. $3 530830
650 4 $a Canadian studies. $3 2122858
650 4 $a Education history. $3 3171959
650 4 $a Canadian history. $3 3174996
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Fine arts. $3 2122690
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Regional studies. $3 3173672
650 4 $a Social studies education. $3 3422293
650 4 $a Learning. $3 516521
650 4 $a Canadian literature. $3 1290728
650 4 $a Councils. $3 3557627
650 4 $a Systematic review. $3 3680549
690 $a 0524
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0319
690 $a 0385
690 $a 0520
690 $a 0334
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0357
690 $a 0578
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0604
690 $a 0534
690 $a 0352
710 2 $a Queen's University (Canada). $3 1017786
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-02A.
790 $a 0283
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28664136