語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Gender, Sex, and Sexual Orientation in Medicine: A Linguistic Analysis.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Gender, Sex, and Sexual Orientation in Medicine: A Linguistic Analysis./
作者:
Kronk, Clair Artemis.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:
121 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International83-04B.
標題:
Bioinformatics. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28765530
ISBN:
9798538148073
Gender, Sex, and Sexual Orientation in Medicine: A Linguistic Analysis.
Kronk, Clair Artemis.
Gender, Sex, and Sexual Orientation in Medicine: A Linguistic Analysis.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 121 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Cincinnati, 2017.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Nine million Americans identify as LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, intersex, agender/asexual, and other umbrella gender and sexual identity minorities), with an additional 187,000 expressing intersex anatomical variations. LGBTQIA+ populations experience disproportionate amounts of discrimination and stigmatization. A 2017 survey revealed that 51% of LGBTQIA+ people said that they or an LGBTQIA+ friend had experienced violence due to their identity. LGBTQIA+ discrimination is also prevalent in healthcare, 33% of transgender individuals disclosed negative experiences related to a health care provider and 23% described avoiding seeing a doctor when they needed due to fear of mistreatment.Such negative experiences are often connected to language use. Linguistic stigmatization has been tied to poor patient outcomes in healthcare settings. However, current provider education on LGBTQIA+ topics is lacking with a median of 5 hours dedicated to such subjects.A first step to addressing health disparities is to adequately model domain-specific linguistic knowledge. In medicine, language is modelled using controlled vocabularies or ontologies. Ontologies are common, shared networks which explain information in a domain. Such systems allow for greater reuse of domain-specific knowledge, and analysis of that knowledge. Although there are hundreds of biomedical ontologies, none cover LGBTQIA+ subject areas, or the areas of gender, sex, and sexual orientation.We created the Gender, Sex, and Sexual Orientation (GSSO) ontology and evaluated its usage in research, education, and clinical domains for accuracy, completeness, conciseness, adaptability, clarity, computational efficiency, and consistency. The GSSO includes over 10,000 entries, 14,000 mappings to other databases, more than 200 slang terms with definitions, 200 nonbinary and culturally-specific gender identities, and 190 pronouns with linked example usages. The GSSO is freely available via GitHub (https://github.com/Superraptor/GSSO) and its website (https://gsso.research.cchmc.org/) as well as via the NCBO BioPortal, EMBL-EBI OLS, and Ontobee (as part of the OBO Foundry ontologies).In research domains, the GSSO was able to perform on par with manually curated literature reviews and outperformed other ontologies in the space. In education, it was able to be easily understood by clinical and non-clinical subgroups. In clinical systems, it outperformed current identification methodologies. We also tested the systems efficacy in LGBTQIA+ language identification in free-text, including research-related abstracts and clinical notes in electronic health records (EHRs). In an LGBTQIA+-specific set of MEDLINE abstracts, the GSSO was able to tag 99.85% versus MeSH tagging 82.62%. In a manually curated transgender bibliography, MeSH would only return 86.9% of results versus the GSSO returning 97.7%. In the EHR, the GSSO outperformed ICD-based identification of transgender persons in both the MIMIC-III (100% versus 46%) and CCHMC (recall and precision of 0.74 and 0.79 versus 0.50 and 0.53) datasets.The GSSO is an effective ontological tool which can be applied across a wide variety of domains and questions.
ISBN: 9798538148073Subjects--Topical Terms:
553671
Bioinformatics.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Gender
Gender, Sex, and Sexual Orientation in Medicine: A Linguistic Analysis.
LDR
:04509nmm a2200445 4500
001
2345608
005
20230119160032.5
008
241004s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798538148073
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28765530
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)OhioLINKucin1617107411106107
035
$a
AAI28765530
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Kronk, Clair Artemis.
$3
3684576
245
1 0
$a
Gender, Sex, and Sexual Orientation in Medicine: A Linguistic Analysis.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2017
300
$a
121 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Cincinnati, 2017.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Nine million Americans identify as LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, intersex, agender/asexual, and other umbrella gender and sexual identity minorities), with an additional 187,000 expressing intersex anatomical variations. LGBTQIA+ populations experience disproportionate amounts of discrimination and stigmatization. A 2017 survey revealed that 51% of LGBTQIA+ people said that they or an LGBTQIA+ friend had experienced violence due to their identity. LGBTQIA+ discrimination is also prevalent in healthcare, 33% of transgender individuals disclosed negative experiences related to a health care provider and 23% described avoiding seeing a doctor when they needed due to fear of mistreatment.Such negative experiences are often connected to language use. Linguistic stigmatization has been tied to poor patient outcomes in healthcare settings. However, current provider education on LGBTQIA+ topics is lacking with a median of 5 hours dedicated to such subjects.A first step to addressing health disparities is to adequately model domain-specific linguistic knowledge. In medicine, language is modelled using controlled vocabularies or ontologies. Ontologies are common, shared networks which explain information in a domain. Such systems allow for greater reuse of domain-specific knowledge, and analysis of that knowledge. Although there are hundreds of biomedical ontologies, none cover LGBTQIA+ subject areas, or the areas of gender, sex, and sexual orientation.We created the Gender, Sex, and Sexual Orientation (GSSO) ontology and evaluated its usage in research, education, and clinical domains for accuracy, completeness, conciseness, adaptability, clarity, computational efficiency, and consistency. The GSSO includes over 10,000 entries, 14,000 mappings to other databases, more than 200 slang terms with definitions, 200 nonbinary and culturally-specific gender identities, and 190 pronouns with linked example usages. The GSSO is freely available via GitHub (https://github.com/Superraptor/GSSO) and its website (https://gsso.research.cchmc.org/) as well as via the NCBO BioPortal, EMBL-EBI OLS, and Ontobee (as part of the OBO Foundry ontologies).In research domains, the GSSO was able to perform on par with manually curated literature reviews and outperformed other ontologies in the space. In education, it was able to be easily understood by clinical and non-clinical subgroups. In clinical systems, it outperformed current identification methodologies. We also tested the systems efficacy in LGBTQIA+ language identification in free-text, including research-related abstracts and clinical notes in electronic health records (EHRs). In an LGBTQIA+-specific set of MEDLINE abstracts, the GSSO was able to tag 99.85% versus MeSH tagging 82.62%. In a manually curated transgender bibliography, MeSH would only return 86.9% of results versus the GSSO returning 97.7%. In the EHR, the GSSO outperformed ICD-based identification of transgender persons in both the MIMIC-III (100% versus 46%) and CCHMC (recall and precision of 0.74 and 0.79 versus 0.50 and 0.53) datasets.The GSSO is an effective ontological tool which can be applied across a wide variety of domains and questions.
590
$a
School code: 0045.
650
4
$a
Bioinformatics.
$3
553671
650
4
$a
Sexual orientation.
$3
528809
650
4
$a
Research.
$3
531893
650
4
$a
Language.
$3
643551
650
4
$a
Dictionaries.
$3
644709
650
4
$a
Science.
$3
516376
650
4
$a
Medical technology.
$3
672535
650
4
$a
Ontology.
$3
530874
650
4
$a
Identification.
$3
827285
650
4
$a
Mental disorders.
$3
728624
650
4
$a
Violence.
$3
528323
650
4
$a
Restrictions.
$3
3564294
650
4
$a
Sex crimes.
$3
607467
650
4
$a
Cognition & reasoning.
$3
3556293
650
4
$a
Medicine.
$3
641104
650
4
$a
Minority & ethnic groups.
$3
3422415
650
4
$a
Health care.
$3
2213177
650
4
$a
Classification.
$3
595585
650
4
$a
Archives & records.
$3
3558980
650
4
$a
Taxonomy.
$3
3556303
650
4
$a
Linguistics.
$3
524476
650
4
$a
Mental health.
$3
534751
650
4
$a
Gender identity.
$3
523751
650
4
$a
Information science.
$3
554358
650
4
$a
LGBTQ studies.
$3
2122706
650
4
$a
Health care management.
$3
2122906
653
$a
Gender
653
$a
Sex
653
$a
Sexual orientation
653
$a
Ontology
653
$a
Electronic health record
653
$a
LGBTQIA
690
$a
0715
690
$a
0290
690
$a
0564
690
$a
0723
690
$a
0347
690
$a
0679
690
$a
0492
690
$a
0769
710
2
$a
University of Cincinnati.
$b
Medicine: Biomedical Informatics.
$3
3684577
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
83-04B.
790
$a
0045
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2017
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28765530
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9468046
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入