東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Writing not Writing: Transdisciplinary Poetics, Institutional Critique.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Writing not Writing: Transdisciplinary Poetics, Institutional Critique./
作者:	Atkin, Miriam.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	163 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-12A.
標題:	English literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28540387
ISBN:	9798515256012

Writing not Writing: Transdisciplinary Poetics, Institutional Critique.
Atkin, Miriam.

Writing not Writing: Transdisciplinary Poetics, Institutional Critique. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 163 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2021.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

This dissertation is an exploration of transdisciplinary creative practice as a means of institutional critique. The artists that I have chosen as my primary focus-Robert Kocik, Eleni Stecopoulos, Zora Neale Hurston, Jimmie Durham, Leslie Scalapino and Lyn Hejinian-employ multiple mediums and fields of discourse to address the presumptions and exclusions that are structurally integral to the institutions that house them. They enact "architextural" interventions through their use of forms that move between the page and three dimensional space, incorporating architecture, sculpture, drawing, painting, film, performance, poetry and prose. My work aims at a renewed understanding of critique as such, and therefore-though the artists I bring together work in various mediums-I focus heavily on works of writing, the art form that is generally regarded as the most suitable means of articulating critical positions. In acknowledgement of the pedagogical indispensability of writing in its many critical and scholarly applications, my investigation contains an underlying questioning of conventional approaches to teaching writing. It is not my aim to suggest new, better ways. Rather, I provide an array of examples demonstrating the inventive and transdisciplinary shapes that critical writing may take.

ISBN: 9798515256012Subjects--Topical Terms:

516356
English literature.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Institutional critique

Writing not Writing: Transdisciplinary Poetics, Institutional Critique.
LDR:02645nmm a2200421 4500 001 2345567
005 20230119160022.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798515256012
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28540387
035 $a AAI28540387
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Atkin, Miriam. $3 3684530
245 1 0 $a Writing not Writing: Transdisciplinary Poetics, Institutional Critique.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 163 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Richardson, Joan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2021.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation is an exploration of transdisciplinary creative practice as a means of institutional critique. The artists that I have chosen as my primary focus-Robert Kocik, Eleni Stecopoulos, Zora Neale Hurston, Jimmie Durham, Leslie Scalapino and Lyn Hejinian-employ multiple mediums and fields of discourse to address the presumptions and exclusions that are structurally integral to the institutions that house them. They enact "architextural" interventions through their use of forms that move between the page and three dimensional space, incorporating architecture, sculpture, drawing, painting, film, performance, poetry and prose. My work aims at a renewed understanding of critique as such, and therefore-though the artists I bring together work in various mediums-I focus heavily on works of writing, the art form that is generally regarded as the most suitable means of articulating critical positions. In acknowledgement of the pedagogical indispensability of writing in its many critical and scholarly applications, my investigation contains an underlying questioning of conventional approaches to teaching writing. It is not my aim to suggest new, better ways. Rather, I provide an array of examples demonstrating the inventive and transdisciplinary shapes that critical writing may take.
590 $a School code: 0046.
650 4 $a English literature. $3 516356
650 4 $a Art criticism. $3 526357
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Literature. $3 537498
653 $a Institutional critique
653 $a Interdisciplinary studies
653 $a Jimmie Durham
653 $a Pedagogy
653 $a Poetics
653 $a Zora Neale Hurston
653 $a Transdisciplinary poetics
690 $a 0593
690 $a 0365
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0401
710 2 $a City University of New York. $b English. $3 1020275
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-12A.
790 $a 0046
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28540387