東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Broadening vs. Deepening: The Correlates of Support for European Integration.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Broadening vs. Deepening: The Correlates of Support for European Integration./
作者:	Dias, Marielena.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	156 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-04A.
標題:	European studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28547516
ISBN:	9798460426324

Broadening vs. Deepening: The Correlates of Support for European Integration.
Dias, Marielena.

Broadening vs. Deepening: The Correlates of Support for European Integration. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 156 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

For decades, scholars have investigated the correlates of support for European integration. Historically, integration has taken place through two specific processes-"broadening" (or enlargement) versus "deepening" (or EU institutional development). Yet, many scholars choose outcome variables that conflate the two. In this dissertation, I conceptually distinguish between both processes and then investigate the correlates of support for broadened versus deepened integration. I achieve three major contributions. The first involves a theoretical contribution. I emphasize the importance of decoupling support for integration into its two historical forms. I provide exploratory factor analysis results that demonstrate how support for either process lies on different dimensions. I use a lesser known original outcome variable from the literature to capture support for deepening, measured as support for increased policy delegation at the EU level. I create my own original outcome variable from a battery of Eurobarometer questions to measure support for broadening. Second, I demonstrate that when these processes are decoupled, we find interesting and unexpected results for our correlates. Finally, I identify several issues with how scholars conceptualize and operationalize support for integration. I provide some ideas for future research to tackle these problems. I emphasize why causation is so crucial to the development of this literature versus relying on correlation and propose a survey experiment that could be implemented to look at how perceived cultural and economic dissimilarity of a potential member state might affect support for broadening.

ISBN: 9798460426324Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168420
European studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Broadening

Broadening vs. Deepening: The Correlates of Support for European Integration.
LDR:02811nmm a2200361 4500 001 2345013
005 20220531062335.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798460426324
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28547516
035 $a AAI28547516
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Dias, Marielena. $3 3683867
245 1 0 $a Broadening vs. Deepening: The Correlates of Support for European Integration.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 156 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Driscoll, Amanda;Ehrlich, Sean.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a For decades, scholars have investigated the correlates of support for European integration. Historically, integration has taken place through two specific processes-"broadening" (or enlargement) versus "deepening" (or EU institutional development). Yet, many scholars choose outcome variables that conflate the two. In this dissertation, I conceptually distinguish between both processes and then investigate the correlates of support for broadened versus deepened integration. I achieve three major contributions. The first involves a theoretical contribution. I emphasize the importance of decoupling support for integration into its two historical forms. I provide exploratory factor analysis results that demonstrate how support for either process lies on different dimensions. I use a lesser known original outcome variable from the literature to capture support for deepening, measured as support for increased policy delegation at the EU level. I create my own original outcome variable from a battery of Eurobarometer questions to measure support for broadening. Second, I demonstrate that when these processes are decoupled, we find interesting and unexpected results for our correlates. Finally, I identify several issues with how scholars conceptualize and operationalize support for integration. I provide some ideas for future research to tackle these problems. I emphasize why causation is so crucial to the development of this literature versus relying on correlation and propose a survey experiment that could be implemented to look at how perceived cultural and economic dissimilarity of a potential member state might affect support for broadening.
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 4 $a European studies. $3 3168420
653 $a Broadening
653 $a Deepening
653 $a European Union
653 $a Integration
653 $a Public opinion
653 $a Support
690 $a 0440
710 2 $a The Florida State University. $b Political Science. $3 2093725
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-04A.
790 $a 0071
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28547516