東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Science Communication and Coproduction: Applying the Theory of Motivated Information Management to the Science-Policy Interface.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Science Communication and Coproduction: Applying the Theory of Motivated Information Management to the Science-Policy Interface./
作者:	Middleton, Lindsey.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	299 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-03.
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28026011
ISBN:	9798664794755

Science Communication and Coproduction: Applying the Theory of Motivated Information Management to the Science-Policy Interface.
Middleton, Lindsey.

Science Communication and Coproduction: Applying the Theory of Motivated Information Management to the Science-Policy Interface. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 299 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--Colorado State University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Science communication scholarship claims that engagement, dialogue, and interaction are important communicative components. But there are relatively very few studies of dialogic science communication processes from a science communication perspective. This study bridges science communication, interpersonal communication, and science-policy interface research and practice to learn how an interpersonal theory models science-policy communication.When science informs policy and land management, myriad science and policy actors must work together to come to a shared understanding of how science will be used. However, there may be differences across the science-policy interface. How do scientists structure research goals, and how do policymakers and managers set research goals? How do timelines differ? How do communication styles, cultures, and values differ? Can they come to a shared understanding? This work studies the policy side of a particular science-policy interface (coproduction) and describes how science stakeholders, or "information seekers," evaluate the utility of working with information providers from organizations outside their own to inform their own science and policy. Information seekers were interviewed, and they provided insights into their perceptions of (1) the trustworthiness and credibility of information providers, (2) their ability to communicate across the interface, (3) the usefulness of the information provided, and more.Results inform future coproduction practice, but also, this study demonstrates a successful application of an interpersonal communication theory to a science-policy interface. Future work might make further use of the predictive and explanatory utility of this model in science communication with high-priority stakeholders, and interpersonal theories and models arguably stand to further inform the dialogic components of science communication.

ISBN: 9798664794755Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Actionable science

Science Communication and Coproduction: Applying the Theory of Motivated Information Management to the Science-Policy Interface.
LDR:03183nmm a2200385 4500 001 2344577
005 20220531064558.5
008 241004s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798664794755
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28026011
035 $a AAI28026011
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Middleton, Lindsey. $3 3683364
245 1 0 $a Science Communication and Coproduction: Applying the Theory of Motivated Information Management to the Science-Policy Interface.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 299 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.
500 $a Advisor: Champ, Joseph.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Colorado State University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Science communication scholarship claims that engagement, dialogue, and interaction are important communicative components. But there are relatively very few studies of dialogic science communication processes from a science communication perspective. This study bridges science communication, interpersonal communication, and science-policy interface research and practice to learn how an interpersonal theory models science-policy communication.When science informs policy and land management, myriad science and policy actors must work together to come to a shared understanding of how science will be used. However, there may be differences across the science-policy interface. How do scientists structure research goals, and how do policymakers and managers set research goals? How do timelines differ? How do communication styles, cultures, and values differ? Can they come to a shared understanding? This work studies the policy side of a particular science-policy interface (coproduction) and describes how science stakeholders, or "information seekers," evaluate the utility of working with information providers from organizations outside their own to inform their own science and policy. Information seekers were interviewed, and they provided insights into their perceptions of (1) the trustworthiness and credibility of information providers, (2) their ability to communicate across the interface, (3) the usefulness of the information provided, and more.Results inform future coproduction practice, but also, this study demonstrates a successful application of an interpersonal communication theory to a science-policy interface. Future work might make further use of the predictive and explanatory utility of this model in science communication with high-priority stakeholders, and interpersonal theories and models arguably stand to further inform the dialogic components of science communication.
590 $a School code: 0053.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Technical communication. $3 3172863
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
653 $a Actionable science
653 $a Coproduction
653 $a Interpersonal communication
653 $a Science communication
653 $a Science-policy interface
653 $a Theory of motivated information management
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0643
690 $a 0528
710 2 $a Colorado State University. $b Journalism and Media Communication. $3 3276536
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-03.
790 $a 0053
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28026011