東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

International Threats and United States Congressional Behavior from 1981 - 2013.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	International Threats and United States Congressional Behavior from 1981 - 2013./
作者:	Randall, Elizabeth.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	61 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-03.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28720212
ISBN:	9798538137336

International Threats and United States Congressional Behavior from 1981 - 2013.
Randall, Elizabeth.

International Threats and United States Congressional Behavior from 1981 - 2013. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 61 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--Utah State University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This paper explores the relationship between a foreign threat and the behavior of members of Congress. Understanding how members of Congress respond to potentially threatening international situations can provide important insight into foreign policy and future responses to new threats. I use information about how legislators vote, their ideology and party, and the topic of legislation to measure how liberal or conservative members of Congress are on foreign policy legislation. This allows me to analyze both how members of Congress behave inside their parties and how they interact with the other party, or in other words, intraparty cohesion and interparty polarization.I find that the parties moderate their positions on foreign policy (relative to all other issues) when a foreign threat is present and the majority in Congress will approach foreign policy from a more moderate angle than the minority party at times of foreign threat; these effects, however, are substantively modest. I also find that party members agree amongst themselves less on foreign policy than on other issues. My results indicate that internal party behavior and interactions between parties are not strongly affected by the presence of a foreign threat.

ISBN: 9798538137336Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Bipartisanship

International Threats and United States Congressional Behavior from 1981 - 2013.
LDR:02424nmm a2200397 4500 001 2344060
005 20220513115359.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798538137336
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28720212
035 $a AAI28720212
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Randall, Elizabeth. $3 3682780
245 1 0 $a International Threats and United States Congressional Behavior from 1981 - 2013.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 61 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
500 $a Advisor: Pechenkina, Anna.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Utah State University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This paper explores the relationship between a foreign threat and the behavior of members of Congress. Understanding how members of Congress respond to potentially threatening international situations can provide important insight into foreign policy and future responses to new threats. I use information about how legislators vote, their ideology and party, and the topic of legislation to measure how liberal or conservative members of Congress are on foreign policy legislation. This allows me to analyze both how members of Congress behave inside their parties and how they interact with the other party, or in other words, intraparty cohesion and interparty polarization.I find that the parties moderate their positions on foreign policy (relative to all other issues) when a foreign threat is present and the majority in Congress will approach foreign policy from a more moderate angle than the minority party at times of foreign threat; these effects, however, are substantively modest. I also find that party members agree amongst themselves less on foreign policy than on other issues. My results indicate that internal party behavior and interactions between parties are not strongly affected by the presence of a foreign threat.
590 $a School code: 0241.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Cold War. $3 566089
650 4 $a Nominations. $3 3564149
650 4 $a Ideology. $3 521772
650 4 $a Threats. $3 594889
650 4 $a Success. $3 518195
650 4 $a Trends. $3 3560051
650 4 $a Social identity. $3 3438286
650 4 $a Political parties. $3 516328
650 4 $a Presidents. $2 fast $3 625545
650 4 $a Congressional elections. $3 3682781
650 4 $a Foreign policy. $3 3563440
650 4 $a Primaries & caucuses. $3 3562102
650 4 $a Fear & phobias. $3 3682147
650 4 $a National security. $3 594947
650 4 $a Cooperation. $3 594090
650 4 $a Hypotheses. $3 3560118
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a National identity. $3 3558957
650 4 $a Variables. $3 3548259
650 4 $a Committees. $3 3563449
650 4 $a Legislation. $3 766385
650 4 $a Attitudes. $3 1973410
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Civil rights. $3 530268
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
653 $a Bipartisanship
653 $a Foreign policy
653 $a House of Representatives
653 $a Party cohesion
653 $a Polarization
653 $a 1981-2013
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0601
710 2 $a Utah State University. $b Political Science. $3 3183251
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-03.
790 $a 0241
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28720212