東華大學圖書館 |

Non-State Superpowers, Transnational Challenges, and 21st Century Global Order: Private Sector Climate Action in an Age of State Inaction.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Non-State Superpowers, Transnational Challenges, and 21st Century Global Order: Private Sector Climate Action in an Age of State Inaction./
作者:	Hulme, Charlotte Jude.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	245 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-02B.
標題:	Business administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28322227
ISBN:	9798522999001

Non-State Superpowers, Transnational Challenges, and 21st Century Global Order: Private Sector Climate Action in an Age of State Inaction.
Hulme, Charlotte Jude.

Non-State Superpowers, Transnational Challenges, and 21st Century Global Order: Private Sector Climate Action in an Age of State Inaction. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 245 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This project explores the new actors, issues, and dynamics that are reshaping the land-scape and context in which states will have to advance their interests in the 21st century. Examining the case study of private sector climate action, it demonstrates that select transnational actors have not just the capacity to alter relationships between governments, as scholars like Nye and Keohane anticipated in the 1970s, but the ability and, increasingly, the ambition to address non-traditional issues that states cannot address independently. Focusing on 34 of the world's largest companies, representing four industry groups (energy-intensive, automotive, technology, and finance) and three main headquarter countries (Germany, India, and the United States), this project investigates and analyzes the process by which private sector actors coalesced into a new pat-tern of response to climate change during the 2010-2017 timeframe and became key, even leading, actors in the issue area. It considers what the phenomenon of private sec-tor climate action implies about changes in global order, including in the actors that are shaping a landscape defined increasingly by non-traditional issues-and, in certain cases, by states' abdication of leadership and action in the face of these complex new challenges.I make three main arguments in this study. First, I argue that private sector actors coalesced around a set of climate-relevant actions as the new "dominant de-sign," or paradigm for long-term success in a changing environment. Second, in contrast to the intuitive explanation, which is that during the 2010s changes in their political and consumer contexts led companies to perceive more serious climate-related risks and/or opportunities, I argue that individual companies did not perceive increasingly strong material incentives to alter their approach vis-a-vis climate change-and it was in this context that they coalesced into a new pattern of response to the issue. The pattern was emergent, or a second-order outcome that would not have been anticipated on the basis of how individual actors perceived the climate issue.Third, I propose that the condition accounting for why companies coalesced in an emergent fashion into a new pattern of behavior was their declining confidence in states' willingness to play their expected role vis-a-vis a critical issue poised to shape future global trends. As I show, from 2010 through 2017, as companies adopted cli-mate practices and became more deeply invested in them, and as select actors altered their approaches decisively and adopted "climate active" sensibilities, companies' out-look for bold state action (in the form of high-impact climate-related regulation) declined significantly.Among the industry groups, technology and finance were the drivers of emergent action. Within most industries, American companies undertook the highest absolute level of action that "ran ahead of" expectations for costly climate-related risks or high-yield climate-related opportunities. However, German companies contributed most significantly to the upward trend in emergent action-an especially notable finding given that historically they have operated in a context of strong state leadership in the climate issue area. The overarching implication of this study is that non-state actors that individually do not appear inclined to alter their approaches vis-a-vis a global issue can, through a decentralized and uncoordinated process, and in the context of states failing to provide leadership, come to change course and move in a cohesive new direction-and ultimately reshape the landscape in which states must advance their own interests.

ISBN: 9798522999001Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168311
Business administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

International order

Non-State Superpowers, Transnational Challenges, and 21st Century Global Order: Private Sector Climate Action in an Age of State Inaction.
LDR:04964nmm a2200397 4500 001 2343995
005 20220513115343.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798522999001
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28322227
035 $a AAI28322227
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hulme, Charlotte Jude. $3 3682677
245 1 0 $a Non-State Superpowers, Transnational Challenges, and 21st Century Global Order: Private Sector Climate Action in an Age of State Inaction.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 245 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Pratt, Tyler.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This project explores the new actors, issues, and dynamics that are reshaping the land-scape and context in which states will have to advance their interests in the 21st century. Examining the case study of private sector climate action, it demonstrates that select transnational actors have not just the capacity to alter relationships between governments, as scholars like Nye and Keohane anticipated in the 1970s, but the ability and, increasingly, the ambition to address non-traditional issues that states cannot address independently. Focusing on 34 of the world's largest companies, representing four industry groups (energy-intensive, automotive, technology, and finance) and three main headquarter countries (Germany, India, and the United States), this project investigates and analyzes the process by which private sector actors coalesced into a new pat-tern of response to climate change during the 2010-2017 timeframe and became key, even leading, actors in the issue area. It considers what the phenomenon of private sec-tor climate action implies about changes in global order, including in the actors that are shaping a landscape defined increasingly by non-traditional issues-and, in certain cases, by states' abdication of leadership and action in the face of these complex new challenges.I make three main arguments in this study. First, I argue that private sector actors coalesced around a set of climate-relevant actions as the new "dominant de-sign," or paradigm for long-term success in a changing environment. Second, in contrast to the intuitive explanation, which is that during the 2010s changes in their political and consumer contexts led companies to perceive more serious climate-related risks and/or opportunities, I argue that individual companies did not perceive increasingly strong material incentives to alter their approach vis-a-vis climate change-and it was in this context that they coalesced into a new pattern of response to the issue. The pattern was emergent, or a second-order outcome that would not have been anticipated on the basis of how individual actors perceived the climate issue.Third, I propose that the condition accounting for why companies coalesced in an emergent fashion into a new pattern of behavior was their declining confidence in states' willingness to play their expected role vis-a-vis a critical issue poised to shape future global trends. As I show, from 2010 through 2017, as companies adopted cli-mate practices and became more deeply invested in them, and as select actors altered their approaches decisively and adopted "climate active" sensibilities, companies' out-look for bold state action (in the form of high-impact climate-related regulation) declined significantly.Among the industry groups, technology and finance were the drivers of emergent action. Within most industries, American companies undertook the highest absolute level of action that "ran ahead of" expectations for costly climate-related risks or high-yield climate-related opportunities. However, German companies contributed most significantly to the upward trend in emergent action-an especially notable finding given that historically they have operated in a context of strong state leadership in the climate issue area. The overarching implication of this study is that non-state actors that individually do not appear inclined to alter their approaches vis-a-vis a global issue can, through a decentralized and uncoordinated process, and in the context of states failing to provide leadership, come to change course and move in a cohesive new direction-and ultimately reshape the landscape in which states must advance their own interests.
590 $a School code: 0265.
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 3168311
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Emissions. $3 3559499
650 4 $a Pandemics. $3 3464080
653 $a International order
653 $a Non-state actors
653 $a Private sector
653 $a Transnational challenges
653 $a Superpowers
653 $a Climate action
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0474
710 2 $a Yale University. $b Political Science. $3 2100466
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-02B.
790 $a 0265
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28322227