東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Playing the Generals' Game: Superpowers, Self-Limiting, and Strategic Emerging Technologies.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Playing the Generals' Game: Superpowers, Self-Limiting, and Strategic Emerging Technologies./
作者:	Schlickenmaier, William A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	438 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-04A.
標題:	Modern history. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28091602
ISBN:	9798678141910

Playing the Generals' Game: Superpowers, Self-Limiting, and Strategic Emerging Technologies.
Schlickenmaier, William A.

Playing the Generals' Game: Superpowers, Self-Limiting, and Strategic Emerging Technologies. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 438 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation explores how states make foreign policy decisions by focusing on superpowers and their decision calculus over strategic emerging technologies. It brings together work on arms control, advanced defense technologies, and decision making theories to generate a new model-the ecosystem model-for decisions to pursue or self-limit technologies.In the ecosystem model, tribes and free agents face off in bureaucratic competition to build policy coalitions that sell decisions to political leaders. In these contests, tribes-the deeply held cross-cutting institutions that transcend leadership changes-and free agents-the more weakly held, politicized institutions-use a mix of strategic assessments and rhetorical commonplaces to build their coalitions. Coalitions change over time, and the nature of a coalition will dictate the policy outcome in question.In Cold War superpower contestation over strategic emerging technologies, three tribes were relevant in both the US and Soviet ecosystems-the military, bilateralists, and arms controllers. In case study research, I show that these tribes recurred and built coalitions with other components of the national security ecosystems to push their policy agendas. Within tribes and free agent institutions, bureaucratic entrepreneurs emerged to press for change from status quo policies both in favor of and against strategic emerging technologies.Of the twelve Cold War strategic emerging technologies I identify, I select three for case study research-biological weapons, antisatellite weapons, and intermediate-range nuclear forces. Through both process tracing and the collection of causal process observations, I show how the ecosystem model better explains policy choices than alternatives based on the balance of power and technology, "classical" bureaucratic politics derived from the work of Graham Allison and Morton Halperin, and arguments based on regime type.I conclude with implications for future superpower bipolar relations with China and today's strategic emerging technologies, and explore whether the ecosystem model could serve as a more general model of foreign policy decision making.

ISBN: 9798678141910Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122829
Modern history.
Subjects--Index Terms:

antisatellite weapons

Playing the Generals' Game: Superpowers, Self-Limiting, and Strategic Emerging Technologies.
LDR:03412nmm a2200397 4500 001 2343965
005 20220513115336.5
008 241004s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798678141910
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28091602
035 $a AAI28091602
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Schlickenmaier, William A. $0 (orcid)0000-0001-7882-1819 $3 3682643
245 1 0 $a Playing the Generals' Game: Superpowers, Self-Limiting, and Strategic Emerging Technologies.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 438 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Arend, Anthony C.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation explores how states make foreign policy decisions by focusing on superpowers and their decision calculus over strategic emerging technologies. It brings together work on arms control, advanced defense technologies, and decision making theories to generate a new model-the ecosystem model-for decisions to pursue or self-limit technologies.In the ecosystem model, tribes and free agents face off in bureaucratic competition to build policy coalitions that sell decisions to political leaders. In these contests, tribes-the deeply held cross-cutting institutions that transcend leadership changes-and free agents-the more weakly held, politicized institutions-use a mix of strategic assessments and rhetorical commonplaces to build their coalitions. Coalitions change over time, and the nature of a coalition will dictate the policy outcome in question.In Cold War superpower contestation over strategic emerging technologies, three tribes were relevant in both the US and Soviet ecosystems-the military, bilateralists, and arms controllers. In case study research, I show that these tribes recurred and built coalitions with other components of the national security ecosystems to push their policy agendas. Within tribes and free agent institutions, bureaucratic entrepreneurs emerged to press for change from status quo policies both in favor of and against strategic emerging technologies.Of the twelve Cold War strategic emerging technologies I identify, I select three for case study research-biological weapons, antisatellite weapons, and intermediate-range nuclear forces. Through both process tracing and the collection of causal process observations, I show how the ecosystem model better explains policy choices than alternatives based on the balance of power and technology, "classical" bureaucratic politics derived from the work of Graham Allison and Morton Halperin, and arguments based on regime type.I conclude with implications for future superpower bipolar relations with China and today's strategic emerging technologies, and explore whether the ecosystem model could serve as a more general model of foreign policy decision making.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Modern history. $3 2122829
650 4 $a Military history. $3 552332
653 $a antisatellite weapons
653 $a biological weapons
653 $a China
653 $a foreign policy
653 $a Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces
653 $a Soviet Union
653 $a Cold War
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0722
690 $a 0582
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Government. $3 1043944
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-04A.
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28091602