語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Towards Energy Justice: A Multidimensional Analysis of Energy Poverty Recognition and Responses in the United States.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Towards Energy Justice: A Multidimensional Analysis of Energy Poverty Recognition and Responses in the United States./
作者:
Bednar, Dominic Jermaine.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:
135 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International83-05B.
標題:
Environmental justice. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28845364
ISBN:
9798471101890
Towards Energy Justice: A Multidimensional Analysis of Energy Poverty Recognition and Responses in the United States.
Bednar, Dominic Jermaine.
Towards Energy Justice: A Multidimensional Analysis of Energy Poverty Recognition and Responses in the United States.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 135 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2021.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Energy justice frameworks and approaches build upon the foundation developed by environmental justice scholarship and activism to combat energy-related disparities. Disparities in access to modern energy services and technologies across nations have motivated contemporary approaches towards achieving the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals and effectuating a just energy transition. Energy poverty, an oft-deployed characterization of these energy-related disparities, reflects a state or condition where households do not have access to sustainable, reliable, and affordable energy. However, current problem characterization and solution interventions for energy poverty in the United States lack a holistic framework that honors the multidimensional nature of household energy deprivation. Limited research explores the relationship between energy deprivation outcomes and spatially varying characteristics such as residential energy affordability, energy efficiency, and race/ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status of household occupants. Accordingly, the crux of this dissertation lies in understanding how institutional barriers-across federal, state, and local levels-enable the persistence of household energy inequities. This dissertation therefore examines the multidimensional nature of energy poverty and the varied recognition of and responses to this phenomenon in the U.S. I use energy vulnerability as a lens to investigate this gap, including the technical, socioeconomic, and environmental-political dimensions that influence household levels of energy poverty. This dissertation employs a multi-method approach including a critical integrative literature review, international and subnational policy comparative analysis, content analysis, and generalized logistic regression techniques. These analyses are situated within the context of historical and contemporary recognition of and responses to the 1973 oil crisis and the 2020 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, respectively. By drawing parallels to formal recognition and responses in the United Kingdom, I promote a more expansive understanding of the current and future landscape of American energy poverty. In Chapter two, I argue that the failure to formally recognize energy poverty at the federal level limits our understanding of its circumstances and hinders systematic approaches to reduce it. Findings suggest that current measurements and evaluative metrics hinge on the distribution of government resources and the number of 'vulnerable' households assisted, rather than the impact federal programs have had on improving household well-being and reducing overall energy poverty. In centering programmatic impact, I offer a more expansive definition and framework for comprehending and responding to energy poverty in the U.S. The next two chapters explore the multiple dimensions of energy poverty and the varied responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Chapter three asks, what factors are associated with the propensity to experience varying levels of energy poverty? I find that several technical, socioeconomic, and environmental factors influence the likelihood of experiencing higher levels of energy poverty. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Chapter four characterizes residential energy protection measures through a suite of resiliency responses deployed in 25 U.S. metropolitan regions. I examine the urgency and binding level of COVID-era protections and demarcate them as either mandatory or voluntary measures, finding that metropolitan regions with lower protections tend to have low-income energy burdens and that energy policy responses are unevenly distributed across the country. This dissertation advances energy and environmental justice scholarship and clarifies the necessary policy interventions for improving energy access for energy-vulnerable households. Collectively, this analysis and examination of energy poverty recognition and responses provides an evidence base for recognizing energy access as a human right.
ISBN: 9798471101890Subjects--Topical Terms:
528369
Environmental justice.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Energy Justice
Towards Energy Justice: A Multidimensional Analysis of Energy Poverty Recognition and Responses in the United States.
LDR
:05444nmm a2200421 4500
001
2343598
005
20220512065848.5
008
241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798471101890
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28845364
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)umichrackham003700
035
$a
AAI28845364
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Bednar, Dominic Jermaine.
$3
3682188
245
1 0
$a
Towards Energy Justice: A Multidimensional Analysis of Energy Poverty Recognition and Responses in the United States.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2021
300
$a
135 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisor: Reames, Tony G.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2021.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506
$a
This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520
$a
Energy justice frameworks and approaches build upon the foundation developed by environmental justice scholarship and activism to combat energy-related disparities. Disparities in access to modern energy services and technologies across nations have motivated contemporary approaches towards achieving the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals and effectuating a just energy transition. Energy poverty, an oft-deployed characterization of these energy-related disparities, reflects a state or condition where households do not have access to sustainable, reliable, and affordable energy. However, current problem characterization and solution interventions for energy poverty in the United States lack a holistic framework that honors the multidimensional nature of household energy deprivation. Limited research explores the relationship between energy deprivation outcomes and spatially varying characteristics such as residential energy affordability, energy efficiency, and race/ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status of household occupants. Accordingly, the crux of this dissertation lies in understanding how institutional barriers-across federal, state, and local levels-enable the persistence of household energy inequities. This dissertation therefore examines the multidimensional nature of energy poverty and the varied recognition of and responses to this phenomenon in the U.S. I use energy vulnerability as a lens to investigate this gap, including the technical, socioeconomic, and environmental-political dimensions that influence household levels of energy poverty. This dissertation employs a multi-method approach including a critical integrative literature review, international and subnational policy comparative analysis, content analysis, and generalized logistic regression techniques. These analyses are situated within the context of historical and contemporary recognition of and responses to the 1973 oil crisis and the 2020 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, respectively. By drawing parallels to formal recognition and responses in the United Kingdom, I promote a more expansive understanding of the current and future landscape of American energy poverty. In Chapter two, I argue that the failure to formally recognize energy poverty at the federal level limits our understanding of its circumstances and hinders systematic approaches to reduce it. Findings suggest that current measurements and evaluative metrics hinge on the distribution of government resources and the number of 'vulnerable' households assisted, rather than the impact federal programs have had on improving household well-being and reducing overall energy poverty. In centering programmatic impact, I offer a more expansive definition and framework for comprehending and responding to energy poverty in the U.S. The next two chapters explore the multiple dimensions of energy poverty and the varied responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Chapter three asks, what factors are associated with the propensity to experience varying levels of energy poverty? I find that several technical, socioeconomic, and environmental factors influence the likelihood of experiencing higher levels of energy poverty. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Chapter four characterizes residential energy protection measures through a suite of resiliency responses deployed in 25 U.S. metropolitan regions. I examine the urgency and binding level of COVID-era protections and demarcate them as either mandatory or voluntary measures, finding that metropolitan regions with lower protections tend to have low-income energy burdens and that energy policy responses are unevenly distributed across the country. This dissertation advances energy and environmental justice scholarship and clarifies the necessary policy interventions for improving energy access for energy-vulnerable households. Collectively, this analysis and examination of energy poverty recognition and responses provides an evidence base for recognizing energy access as a human right.
590
$a
School code: 0127.
650
4
$a
Environmental justice.
$3
528369
650
4
$a
Energy.
$3
876794
650
4
$a
Environmental science.
$3
677245
653
$a
Energy Justice
653
$a
Energy Poverty
653
$a
Energy Vulnerability
653
$a
COVID-19
653
$a
Recognition Justice
653
$a
Environmental Justice
653
$a
Coronavirus pandemic 2019
690
$a
0791
690
$a
0619
690
$a
0768
710
2
$a
University of Michigan.
$b
Resource Policy & Behavior PhD.
$3
3547699
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
83-05B.
790
$a
0127
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2021
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28845364
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9466036
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入