東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Recognition, Self-Determination and Treaty Federalism: Understanding Indigenous-State Relationships in Co-Management Regimes in Canada.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Recognition, Self-Determination and Treaty Federalism: Understanding Indigenous-State Relationships in Co-Management Regimes in Canada./
作者:	Smith, Joanne.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	89 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-03.
標題:	Canadian studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28731001
ISBN:	9798544223269

Recognition, Self-Determination and Treaty Federalism: Understanding Indigenous-State Relationships in Co-Management Regimes in Canada.
Smith, Joanne.

Recognition, Self-Determination and Treaty Federalism: Understanding Indigenous-State Relationships in Co-Management Regimes in Canada. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 89 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.

Thesis (LL.M.)--McGill University (Canada), 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The nature of the relationship between Indigenous peoples and the Canadian state has continuously evolved. Alongside this, different and often conflicting legal perspectives have arisen in order to better understand this relationship. This thesis considers how such perspectives can be grouped into identifiable frameworks which act as a blueprint for the relationship. Three frameworks will be analysed in this paper: recognition, self-determination, and treaty federalism. Where a particular model is applied, its associated objectives, assumptions, and limitations form the legal foundation of the relationship. To demonstrate how these frameworks can be used as a model to inform the Indigenous-state relationship and how such framework choice is reflected in the final relationship, three co-management regimes are analysed: the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board, Cowichan Watershed Board, and agreements establishing co-management on Haida Gwaii. It is argued that, in order to improve communication, notice must be taken of these frameworks to allow conversations and negotiations between Indigenous peoples and the state to be more effective. This will improve the Indigenous-state legal relationship and lead to beneficial environmental practices.

ISBN: 9798544223269Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122858
Canadian studies.

Recognition, Self-Determination and Treaty Federalism: Understanding Indigenous-State Relationships in Co-Management Regimes in Canada.
LDR:03588nmm a2200361 4500 001 2343581
005 20220512065843.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798544223269
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28731001
035 $a (MiAaPQ)McGill_k643b596d
035 $a AAI28731001
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Smith, Joanne. $3 3682169
245 1 0 $a Recognition, Self-Determination and Treaty Federalism: Understanding Indigenous-State Relationships in Co-Management Regimes in Canada.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 89 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
500 $a Advisor: Anker, Kirsten.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--McGill University (Canada), 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The nature of the relationship between Indigenous peoples and the Canadian state has continuously evolved. Alongside this, different and often conflicting legal perspectives have arisen in order to better understand this relationship. This thesis considers how such perspectives can be grouped into identifiable frameworks which act as a blueprint for the relationship. Three frameworks will be analysed in this paper: recognition, self-determination, and treaty federalism. Where a particular model is applied, its associated objectives, assumptions, and limitations form the legal foundation of the relationship. To demonstrate how these frameworks can be used as a model to inform the Indigenous-state relationship and how such framework choice is reflected in the final relationship, three co-management regimes are analysed: the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board, Cowichan Watershed Board, and agreements establishing co-management on Haida Gwaii. It is argued that, in order to improve communication, notice must be taken of these frameworks to allow conversations and negotiations between Indigenous peoples and the state to be more effective. This will improve the Indigenous-state legal relationship and lead to beneficial environmental practices.
520 $a Au fil des annees, la relation entre les peuples Autochtones et l'Etat canadien a evolue. En parallele, de differentes perspectives juridiques, souvent contradictoires, sont apparues. Cette these considere comment ces perspectives peuvent etre regroupees dans des structures identifiables, qui agissent comme un schema pour la relation. Trois structures sont analysees dans ce texte : la reconnaissance, l'autodetermination, et le federalisme par traite. Quand un modele est applique, les buts, hypotheses et limitations associes forment la fondation juridique de la structure. Pour demontrer comment ces structures peuvent etre utilisees en tant que modele pour informer la relation Autochtone-Etat, trois regimes de cogestion sont etudies : le conseil de gestion des ressources faunique de Nunavut, la commission du bassin hydrographique de Cowichan, et l'accord de cogestion sur Haida Gwaii. Il est avance que, pour ameliorer la communication, il faut se rendre compte de ces structures pour permettre des conversations et negociations efficaces entre l'Etat et les peuples Autochtone. Ceci ameliorera la relation juridique Autochtone-Etat et menera a des pratiques environnementales benefiques.
590 $a School code: 0781.
650 4 $a Canadian studies. $3 2122858
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Native American studies. $3 2122730
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Copyright. $3 601694
650 4 $a Metadata. $3 590006
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0740
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0385
710 2 $a McGill University (Canada). $3 1018122
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-03.
790 $a 0781
791 $a LL.M.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28731001