語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Making Space for Marginalized Voices: Deliberative Activism in Participatory Budgeting.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Making Space for Marginalized Voices: Deliberative Activism in Participatory Budgeting./
作者:
Russell, Vincent.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:
470 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International83-03A.
標題:
Communication. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28543024
ISBN:
9798538119424
Making Space for Marginalized Voices: Deliberative Activism in Participatory Budgeting.
Russell, Vincent.
Making Space for Marginalized Voices: Deliberative Activism in Participatory Budgeting.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 470 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Boulder, 2021.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Participatory budgeting (PB) is a directly democratic, structured process in which community members propose, deliberate, and decide how to allocate a portion of a municipal or public budget. PB was created in Brazil to involve oppressed community members in funding public projects addressing their social justice needs. However, as PB spread around the world, the globalized version no longer emphasizes that goal. Severing that tie, coupled with the limited number of U.S. PB processes implemented and studied, has raised questions about PB's ability to advance social justice in that country. Additionally, although (quantitative) studies have explored inclusion of oppressed community members and PB participation effects on political engagement, few studies have explored participants' deliberative communicative behavior (and, specifically, its social justice characteristics) or perceptions of PB's social justice capabilities. To fill those gaps, this applied, community-based, ethnographic study (employing participant observation, interviews, questionnaires, and document/artifact analysis) investigated whether (and how) two Denver, CO, grassroots PB processes (Auraria PB and Cole Has a Soul): (a) were characterized by socially just participant representation and deliberative communicative practices, (b) participants perceived PB as advancing social justice, and (c) PB affected participants' political engagement and community connection. Results showed that a representative number of oppressed community members participated, facilitators' communication about the Auraria PB process emphasized their inclusion and equitable treatment, and participants communicated explicitly about inclusion, equity, and empowerment, as well as about using PB to challenge unjust power systems. Additionally, Cole Has a Soul participants perceived PB as advancing social justice, and they formed durable relationships, but they demonstrated only minor changes in public participation, whereas Auraria PB participants did not form that perception or relationships but showed major changes toward justice-oriented citizenship. Discussion of the findings focuses on socially just PB practices (e.g., diverse participation and communication during deliberations); oppressed community members' preference for relational, rather than instrumental, deliberation; PB's limited utility as a form of deliberative activism, and PB's grassroots origins engendering communication values that can advance social justice. Recommendations are offered for engaging oppressed community members in and using this collective decision-making process to advance social justice.
ISBN: 9798538119424Subjects--Topical Terms:
524709
Communication.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Community-based research
Making Space for Marginalized Voices: Deliberative Activism in Participatory Budgeting.
LDR
:03902nmm a2200385 4500
001
2343507
005
20220512065824.5
008
241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798538119424
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28543024
035
$a
AAI28543024
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Russell, Vincent.
$3
3542895
245
1 0
$a
Making Space for Marginalized Voices: Deliberative Activism in Participatory Budgeting.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2021
300
$a
470 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisor: Frey, Lawrence R.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Boulder, 2021.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Participatory budgeting (PB) is a directly democratic, structured process in which community members propose, deliberate, and decide how to allocate a portion of a municipal or public budget. PB was created in Brazil to involve oppressed community members in funding public projects addressing their social justice needs. However, as PB spread around the world, the globalized version no longer emphasizes that goal. Severing that tie, coupled with the limited number of U.S. PB processes implemented and studied, has raised questions about PB's ability to advance social justice in that country. Additionally, although (quantitative) studies have explored inclusion of oppressed community members and PB participation effects on political engagement, few studies have explored participants' deliberative communicative behavior (and, specifically, its social justice characteristics) or perceptions of PB's social justice capabilities. To fill those gaps, this applied, community-based, ethnographic study (employing participant observation, interviews, questionnaires, and document/artifact analysis) investigated whether (and how) two Denver, CO, grassroots PB processes (Auraria PB and Cole Has a Soul): (a) were characterized by socially just participant representation and deliberative communicative practices, (b) participants perceived PB as advancing social justice, and (c) PB affected participants' political engagement and community connection. Results showed that a representative number of oppressed community members participated, facilitators' communication about the Auraria PB process emphasized their inclusion and equitable treatment, and participants communicated explicitly about inclusion, equity, and empowerment, as well as about using PB to challenge unjust power systems. Additionally, Cole Has a Soul participants perceived PB as advancing social justice, and they formed durable relationships, but they demonstrated only minor changes in public participation, whereas Auraria PB participants did not form that perception or relationships but showed major changes toward justice-oriented citizenship. Discussion of the findings focuses on socially just PB practices (e.g., diverse participation and communication during deliberations); oppressed community members' preference for relational, rather than instrumental, deliberation; PB's limited utility as a form of deliberative activism, and PB's grassroots origins engendering communication values that can advance social justice. Recommendations are offered for engaging oppressed community members in and using this collective decision-making process to advance social justice.
590
$a
School code: 0051.
650
4
$a
Communication.
$3
524709
650
4
$a
Public policy.
$3
532803
650
4
$a
Political science.
$3
528916
650
4
$a
Research methodology.
$3
3559994
650
4
$a
Ethnography.
$3
705632
650
4
$a
Political activism.
$2
bicssc
$3
2079578
650
4
$a
Citizen participation.
$3
3560084
650
4
$a
Decision making.
$3
517204
650
4
$a
Democracy.
$3
519163
650
4
$a
Voter behavior.
$3
3564157
650
4
$a
Nonprofit organizations.
$3
540326
653
$a
Community-based research
653
$a
Critical ethnography
653
$a
Deliberative activism
653
$a
Participatory budgeting
653
$a
Public deliberation
653
$a
Social justice
690
$a
0459
690
$a
0630
690
$a
0615
710
2
$a
University of Colorado at Boulder.
$b
Communication.
$3
1043819
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
83-03A.
790
$a
0051
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2021
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28543024
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9465945
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入