東華大學圖書館 |

Individual and Household Life Course Explanation to Entrepreneurial Exit.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Individual and Household Life Course Explanation to Entrepreneurial Exit./
作者:	Alam, Muntasir.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	302 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-07A.
標題:	Exploitation. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28871426
ISBN:	9798759930402

Individual and Household Life Course Explanation to Entrepreneurial Exit.
Alam, Muntasir.

Individual and Household Life Course Explanation to Entrepreneurial Exit. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 302 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom), 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Entrepreneurial exit, a critical stage in the entrepreneurial process, happens when the venture creators disengage from ownership control and decision-making authority of the firm they helped to create. Until now, academic research delineating the role of individual and household level resources in explaining exit (or otherwise) are relatively sparse. Of the limited research that provided a resource-based explanation to exit, hardly any research has investigated the influence of a multitude of different resources on the exit process and the subsequent decision to exit. Moreover, the impact of resources on the exit decision has only been studied at the individual level of analysis, despite evidence suggesting an inextricably intertwined relationship between the entrepreneur and the entrepreneurial households. Like the literature on entrepreneurship more broadly, research on entrepreneurial exit largely relies on cross-sectional data. Moving beyond the current understanding that exit is a dichotomous adverse event often equating to business failure, this research attempts to study the exit phenomenon factoring 'the time an individual takes to make the exit decision' to understand the influence of resources to determine (a) who experience an exit event (as opposed to who remain in business), (b) when in the business life course they make the exit decision, and (c) varying exit profiles for individuals. More specifically, this research study entrepreneurial exit from an entrepreneurial resource perspective, paying particular attention to human, financial and time as key resources to succeed, or otherwise, in the entrepreneurial journey. Drawing upon the UK longitudinal household survey (UKLHS), the thesis finds that a combination of human, financial and time resources determines one's faith in business. Overall, the author found support for the original thesis that household dynamics are highly influential in explaining the likelihood of the entrepreneur exiting from their business. The research findings also suggested that whether resources facilitate or constrain entrepreneurial practice, the effect of those resources in determining the exit outcome vary considerably.The study has made several contributions to the entrepreneurial exit literature. First, this research extends the current knowledge base on entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial exit with its exploration of the role of the resource in the entrepreneur's exit decision. Second, by adopting the entrepreneurial household as the framing context and positioning self-employed/business owners' resource base within the resource base of their household, this study has extended the resource definition to entrepreneur exit, which was earlier looked upon from an owner-centric perspective. Third, the life course analysis generated a more complex picture of entrepreneur exit than those provided by the existing literature. More specifically, by building the nuanced empirical understanding of resource demands, this research offers a broader conceptualisation of exit conditions that enable entrepreneurs and self-employed individuals to experience varying forms of exists. The typology that differentiates voluntary from non-voluntary and positive exit experience from negative experiences helps to respond to the call for reframing exit as an emergent opportunity-based decision rather than a one-off misfortune that often refers to in the exit literature as a 'failure' event. At the policy level, research findings challenge the policy discourse that anyone with access to minimum levels of resources and institutional support can start entrepreneurship by highlighting the importance of entrepreneurial capital. This research also challenges the policy understanding that household dynamics are separate from entrepreneurial/enterprise decisions, thereby overlooking the role of the household in entrepreneurial decisions, including exit.

ISBN: 9798759930402Subjects--Topical Terms:

562045
Exploitation.

Individual and Household Life Course Explanation to Entrepreneurial Exit.
LDR:05036nmm a2200337 4500 001 2343407
005 20220502104247.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798759930402
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28871426
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Liverpool_3134706
035 $a AAI28871426
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Alam, Muntasir. $3 3681967
245 1 0 $a Individual and Household Life Course Explanation to Entrepreneurial Exit.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 302 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Jayawarna, Dilani;Jones, Oswald.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom), 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Entrepreneurial exit, a critical stage in the entrepreneurial process, happens when the venture creators disengage from ownership control and decision-making authority of the firm they helped to create. Until now, academic research delineating the role of individual and household level resources in explaining exit (or otherwise) are relatively sparse. Of the limited research that provided a resource-based explanation to exit, hardly any research has investigated the influence of a multitude of different resources on the exit process and the subsequent decision to exit. Moreover, the impact of resources on the exit decision has only been studied at the individual level of analysis, despite evidence suggesting an inextricably intertwined relationship between the entrepreneur and the entrepreneurial households. Like the literature on entrepreneurship more broadly, research on entrepreneurial exit largely relies on cross-sectional data. Moving beyond the current understanding that exit is a dichotomous adverse event often equating to business failure, this research attempts to study the exit phenomenon factoring 'the time an individual takes to make the exit decision' to understand the influence of resources to determine (a) who experience an exit event (as opposed to who remain in business), (b) when in the business life course they make the exit decision, and (c) varying exit profiles for individuals. More specifically, this research study entrepreneurial exit from an entrepreneurial resource perspective, paying particular attention to human, financial and time as key resources to succeed, or otherwise, in the entrepreneurial journey. Drawing upon the UK longitudinal household survey (UKLHS), the thesis finds that a combination of human, financial and time resources determines one's faith in business. Overall, the author found support for the original thesis that household dynamics are highly influential in explaining the likelihood of the entrepreneur exiting from their business. The research findings also suggested that whether resources facilitate or constrain entrepreneurial practice, the effect of those resources in determining the exit outcome vary considerably.The study has made several contributions to the entrepreneurial exit literature. First, this research extends the current knowledge base on entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial exit with its exploration of the role of the resource in the entrepreneur's exit decision. Second, by adopting the entrepreneurial household as the framing context and positioning self-employed/business owners' resource base within the resource base of their household, this study has extended the resource definition to entrepreneur exit, which was earlier looked upon from an owner-centric perspective. Third, the life course analysis generated a more complex picture of entrepreneur exit than those provided by the existing literature. More specifically, by building the nuanced empirical understanding of resource demands, this research offers a broader conceptualisation of exit conditions that enable entrepreneurs and self-employed individuals to experience varying forms of exists. The typology that differentiates voluntary from non-voluntary and positive exit experience from negative experiences helps to respond to the call for reframing exit as an emergent opportunity-based decision rather than a one-off misfortune that often refers to in the exit literature as a 'failure' event. At the policy level, research findings challenge the policy discourse that anyone with access to minimum levels of resources and institutional support can start entrepreneurship by highlighting the importance of entrepreneurial capital. This research also challenges the policy understanding that household dynamics are separate from entrepreneurial/enterprise decisions, thereby overlooking the role of the household in entrepreneurial decisions, including exit.
590 $a School code: 0722.
650 4 $a Exploitation. $3 562045
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Gender. $3 2001319
650 4 $a Society. $3 700566
650 4 $a Tenure. $3 3561541
650 4 $a Survival analysis. $3 3566266
650 4 $a Households. $3 579926
690 $a 0429
690 $a 0510
690 $a 0629
690 $a 0454
710 2 $a The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom). $3 1684840
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-07A.
790 $a 0722
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28871426