東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Navigating the Built Environment: Architecture and Social Connectedness in the Southern Levant, 330 BCE - 250 CE.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Navigating the Built Environment: Architecture and Social Connectedness in the Southern Levant, 330 BCE - 250 CE./
Author:	Winter, Matthew A.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	419 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-03A.
Subject:	Archaeology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28087373
ISBN:	9798664718645

Navigating the Built Environment: Architecture and Social Connectedness in the Southern Levant, 330 BCE - 250 CE.
Winter, Matthew A.

Navigating the Built Environment: Architecture and Social Connectedness in the Southern Levant, 330 BCE - 250 CE. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 419 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

During the Hellenistic and Roman periods three major subregions in the southern Levant emerge: Idumaea, Judaea, and Samaria. Each region was occupied by a different, ostensibly Jewish, ethnic group, each of which were negotiating their identities in an increasingly cosmopolitan and imperial world. Consequently, questions of degrees of Hellenization and Romanization are deeply important in historical and archaeological studies. This study examines how sites within these three subregions were connected to one another in the Hellenistic and Roman periods using building techniques, forms, and decor as the archaeological objects of analysis. This dissertation uses two primary methodological approaches. First, intragroup relations are examined through the application of formal concept analysis. Second, social network analysis is utilized to examine wider macroregional and intergroup connectivity. This is the first application of social network analysis to architectural material from the Greco-Roman Levant and demonstrates the utility of integrating both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The social networks reveal relatively pan-regional conservatism in architectural techniques resulting in high degrees of connection between the three regions in terms of building techniques. When considering building forms and architectural decor, however, the networks decompose into several smaller cliques predicated on different forms of identity. When the social network data are put into dialogue with the semiotics of architecture, this study demonstrates that while there was a regional architectural language, different Jewish communities were "speaking" different architectural dialects, which are proxies for identity. The results from this study demonstrate that although all three regions were occupied by Jewish populations, those that lived in Samaria and Idumaea engaged with Greco-Roman architectural traditions in different ways contra to traditional Judaean proclivities against foreign influences. Furthermore, traditional architectural markers of "Jewishness" in the forms of ritual bathing facilities and synagogues are not as widely distributed across Jewish communities, pointing to internal contestations of what was considered "proper" Jewish practices. These results alter standard interpretations by demonstrating that Jewish communities in the southern Levant in the Hellenistic and Roman periods were not monolithic in how they (re)defined their identities, which were deeply influenced by regional, sociocultural, and ethnic affiliations.

ISBN: 9798664718645Subjects--Topical Terms:

558412
Archaeology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Archaeology

Navigating the Built Environment: Architecture and Social Connectedness in the Southern Levant, 330 BCE - 250 CE.
LDR:03792nmm a2200373 4500 001 2343126
005 20220502104140.5
008 241004s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798664718645
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28087373
035 $a AAI28087373
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Winter, Matthew A. $3 3681585
245 1 0 $a Navigating the Built Environment: Architecture and Social Connectedness in the Southern Levant, 330 BCE - 250 CE.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 419 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Blake, Emma C.;Soren, David H.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a During the Hellenistic and Roman periods three major subregions in the southern Levant emerge: Idumaea, Judaea, and Samaria. Each region was occupied by a different, ostensibly Jewish, ethnic group, each of which were negotiating their identities in an increasingly cosmopolitan and imperial world. Consequently, questions of degrees of Hellenization and Romanization are deeply important in historical and archaeological studies. This study examines how sites within these three subregions were connected to one another in the Hellenistic and Roman periods using building techniques, forms, and decor as the archaeological objects of analysis. This dissertation uses two primary methodological approaches. First, intragroup relations are examined through the application of formal concept analysis. Second, social network analysis is utilized to examine wider macroregional and intergroup connectivity. This is the first application of social network analysis to architectural material from the Greco-Roman Levant and demonstrates the utility of integrating both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The social networks reveal relatively pan-regional conservatism in architectural techniques resulting in high degrees of connection between the three regions in terms of building techniques. When considering building forms and architectural decor, however, the networks decompose into several smaller cliques predicated on different forms of identity. When the social network data are put into dialogue with the semiotics of architecture, this study demonstrates that while there was a regional architectural language, different Jewish communities were "speaking" different architectural dialects, which are proxies for identity. The results from this study demonstrate that although all three regions were occupied by Jewish populations, those that lived in Samaria and Idumaea engaged with Greco-Roman architectural traditions in different ways contra to traditional Judaean proclivities against foreign influences. Furthermore, traditional architectural markers of "Jewishness" in the forms of ritual bathing facilities and synagogues are not as widely distributed across Jewish communities, pointing to internal contestations of what was considered "proper" Jewish practices. These results alter standard interpretations by demonstrating that Jewish communities in the southern Levant in the Hellenistic and Roman periods were not monolithic in how they (re)defined their identities, which were deeply influenced by regional, sociocultural, and ethnic affiliations.
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Archaeology. $3 558412
650 4 $a Near Eastern studies. $3 2122821
653 $a Archaeology
653 $a Architecture
653 $a Greco-Roman near East
653 $a Judaic studies
653 $a Social network analysis
690 $a 0324
690 $a 0729
690 $a 0559
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Anthropology. $3 1020311
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-03A.
790 $a 0009
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28087373