東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Counter/Public: The Politics of Committed Film in the Philippines.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Counter/Public: The Politics of Committed Film in the Philippines./
作者:	Rudin, Daniel.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	211 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-05A.
標題:	Film studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28719866
ISBN:	9798492753542

Counter/Public: The Politics of Committed Film in the Philippines.
Rudin, Daniel.

Counter/Public: The Politics of Committed Film in the Philippines. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 211 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Cruz, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The "new cinema" was a loose film movement in the Philippines in the 1970s-80s known for combining nationalist and social themes with melodramatic form. Film scholarship in the Philippines has traditionally historicized the "new cinema" through an affirmative, national lens. More recent approaches problematize the nationalist frame through critical transnationalism, discourse analysis, cultural memory studies, and affect and genre theory. Yet, these studies overlook the ideological relation between cinema and the global Left. This dissertation emphasizes national cinema as a historically specific ideology. It situates the "new cinema" within shifting regimes of global capital accumulation through cinema's politicization-that is, in terms of political ideas and aesthetic conceptions on the Left. This progressive discourse was committed to the political and economic autonomy of the Philippine nation yet regarded the artist's freedom with ambivalence. The same ambivalence characterized the "new cinema's" opposition to Hollywood-with which it was always face-to-face. In this respect, national cinema was not an idee fixe but a battleground where the nation-state was both abettor and enemy.This dissertation asks: what are the roots of debates on political art in the Philippines? What was at stake in the conflict between the "new cinema" and the filmmaking industry built by the preceding generation? What was the aesthetic self-understanding of independent filmmakers and collectives during democratization? After the 1986 revolution, in what sense did the media cartel inherit the "new cinema's" nationalist and pedagogical concerns? It concludes that while a nationalist self-understanding led to novel aesthetic results, a progressive narrative limited the "new cinema's critical interpretation.

ISBN: 9798492753542Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122736
Film studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Culture

Counter/Public: The Politics of Committed Film in the Philippines.
LDR:02956nmm a2200385 4500 001 2342876
005 20220415153029.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798492753542
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28719866
035 $a AAI28719866
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rudin, Daniel. $3 3681271
245 1 0 $a Counter/Public: The Politics of Committed Film in the Philippines.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 211 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Daniel, Sharon.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Cruz, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The "new cinema" was a loose film movement in the Philippines in the 1970s-80s known for combining nationalist and social themes with melodramatic form. Film scholarship in the Philippines has traditionally historicized the "new cinema" through an affirmative, national lens. More recent approaches problematize the nationalist frame through critical transnationalism, discourse analysis, cultural memory studies, and affect and genre theory. Yet, these studies overlook the ideological relation between cinema and the global Left. This dissertation emphasizes national cinema as a historically specific ideology. It situates the "new cinema" within shifting regimes of global capital accumulation through cinema's politicization-that is, in terms of political ideas and aesthetic conceptions on the Left. This progressive discourse was committed to the political and economic autonomy of the Philippine nation yet regarded the artist's freedom with ambivalence. The same ambivalence characterized the "new cinema's" opposition to Hollywood-with which it was always face-to-face. In this respect, national cinema was not an idee fixe but a battleground where the nation-state was both abettor and enemy.This dissertation asks: what are the roots of debates on political art in the Philippines? What was at stake in the conflict between the "new cinema" and the filmmaking industry built by the preceding generation? What was the aesthetic self-understanding of independent filmmakers and collectives during democratization? After the 1986 revolution, in what sense did the media cartel inherit the "new cinema's" nationalist and pedagogical concerns? It concludes that while a nationalist self-understanding led to novel aesthetic results, a progressive narrative limited the "new cinema's critical interpretation.
590 $a School code: 0036.
650 4 $a Film studies. $3 2122736
650 4 $a Southeast Asian studies. $3 3344898
650 4 $a Aesthetics. $3 523036
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
653 $a Culture
653 $a Film
653 $a Philippines
653 $a Politics
653 $a Video
690 $a 0900
690 $a 0222
690 $a 0650
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a University of California, Santa Cruz. $b Film & Digital Media (Visual Studies). $3 3352986
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-05A.
790 $a 0036
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28719866