東華大學圖書館 |

Never the Same Storytime Twice: An Exploration of the Nature and Role of Reflection in Public Library Storytime Assessment.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Never the Same Storytime Twice: An Exploration of the Nature and Role of Reflection in Public Library Storytime Assessment./
作者:	Mills, J. Elizabeth.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	384 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-03A.
標題:	Library science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28498336
ISBN:	9798535500034

Never the Same Storytime Twice: An Exploration of the Nature and Role of Reflection in Public Library Storytime Assessment.
Mills, J. Elizabeth.

Never the Same Storytime Twice: An Exploration of the Nature and Role of Reflection in Public Library Storytime Assessment. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 384 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Public library storytimes have been well-established as informal learning environments that can support the learning and development of young children through interactive, intentional programming produced by storytime providers (McKechnie, 2006; Becker, 2012; Campana et al., 2014; Campana et al., 2016; Mills et al., 2018; Campana, 2018; Campana, 2019; Campana et al., 2019). Storytime production (McKenzie & Stooke, 2007) consists of the stages of planning, delivery, and assessment (Campana, Mills, & Ghoting, 2016; Mills, Campana, & Clarke, 2016), and though research has examined the planning and delivery of storytimes, assessment remains largely emergent and unexplored (Mills et al., 2015). In fact, in-depth research has not yet been done into the role of the design process of reflection-on-action (Schon, 1991) in storytime planning and assessment. Moreover, there is not yet research showing evidence of reflection-in-action in storytime delivery, which could contribute to a deeper understanding of this concept for practitioners and enable more informed advocacy with stakeholders and communities. A strong need exists, therefore, for a reflective approach that might give storytime providers an effective tool for advocacy and self-assessment.Using a qualitative, secondary analysis of data from an existing study of early literacy measures in storytime, and an application of the theoretical framework of reflection-in- and -on-action (Schon, 1983, 1987), this study explored how storytime providers use reflection-in- and -on-action in the storytime production stages of planning, delivery, and assessment to create positive learning spaces for the young children and their families who attend. The facets and nuances of these stages, surfaced in the data, when combined with the theoretical framework, yielded the Reflective Self-Assessment Framework that enables providers to both leverage the reflection they're already doing on their own programs and recognize the reflection they're conducting during the program to shift and adjust based on what they are observing in the moment. These two types of reflection provide new depth to existing assessment work being done by librarians and enables them to look at all aspects of the storytime production process-planning, delivery, and assessment-in a holistic way. This work further intersects librarianship and design, building on the work of Clarke (2016) and others, to demonstrate how children's librarianship and design fit together. The findings yielded definitions of each storytime production stage and demonstrated how reflection is present in the work that storytime providers do. Furthermore, these stages intersect with and inform one another, revealing a fluidity to this design work to develop storytimes. The resulting framework situates these stages within, and in so doing, reimagines certain aspects of the existing processes of reflection-in- and -on-action.

ISBN: 9798535500034Subjects--Topical Terms:

539284
Library science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Children's librarianship

Never the Same Storytime Twice: An Exploration of the Nature and Role of Reflection in Public Library Storytime Assessment.
LDR:04195nmm a2200385 4500 001 2342351
005 20220318093120.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798535500034
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28498336
035 $a AAI28498336
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mills, J. Elizabeth. $3 3680696
245 1 0 $a Never the Same Storytime Twice: An Exploration of the Nature and Role of Reflection in Public Library Storytime Assessment.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 384 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Martin, Michelle H.;Eisenberg, Michael.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Public library storytimes have been well-established as informal learning environments that can support the learning and development of young children through interactive, intentional programming produced by storytime providers (McKechnie, 2006; Becker, 2012; Campana et al., 2014; Campana et al., 2016; Mills et al., 2018; Campana, 2018; Campana, 2019; Campana et al., 2019). Storytime production (McKenzie & Stooke, 2007) consists of the stages of planning, delivery, and assessment (Campana, Mills, & Ghoting, 2016; Mills, Campana, & Clarke, 2016), and though research has examined the planning and delivery of storytimes, assessment remains largely emergent and unexplored (Mills et al., 2015). In fact, in-depth research has not yet been done into the role of the design process of reflection-on-action (Schon, 1991) in storytime planning and assessment. Moreover, there is not yet research showing evidence of reflection-in-action in storytime delivery, which could contribute to a deeper understanding of this concept for practitioners and enable more informed advocacy with stakeholders and communities. A strong need exists, therefore, for a reflective approach that might give storytime providers an effective tool for advocacy and self-assessment.Using a qualitative, secondary analysis of data from an existing study of early literacy measures in storytime, and an application of the theoretical framework of reflection-in- and -on-action (Schon, 1983, 1987), this study explored how storytime providers use reflection-in- and -on-action in the storytime production stages of planning, delivery, and assessment to create positive learning spaces for the young children and their families who attend. The facets and nuances of these stages, surfaced in the data, when combined with the theoretical framework, yielded the Reflective Self-Assessment Framework that enables providers to both leverage the reflection they're already doing on their own programs and recognize the reflection they're conducting during the program to shift and adjust based on what they are observing in the moment. These two types of reflection provide new depth to existing assessment work being done by librarians and enables them to look at all aspects of the storytime production process-planning, delivery, and assessment-in a holistic way. This work further intersects librarianship and design, building on the work of Clarke (2016) and others, to demonstrate how children's librarianship and design fit together. The findings yielded definitions of each storytime production stage and demonstrated how reflection is present in the work that storytime providers do. Furthermore, these stages intersect with and inform one another, revealing a fluidity to this design work to develop storytimes. The resulting framework situates these stages within, and in so doing, reimagines certain aspects of the existing processes of reflection-in- and -on-action.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Library science. $3 539284
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 3172312
650 4 $a Research. $3 531893
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
650 4 $a Population. $3 518693
650 4 $a Principles. $3 3559989
650 4 $a Self evaluation. $3 3435347
650 4 $a Collaboration. $3 3556296
650 4 $a Audiences. $3 618475
650 4 $a Dissertations & theses. $3 3560115
650 4 $a Storytelling. $3 535033
650 4 $a Feedback. $3 677181
650 4 $a Reflective practice. $3 3680697
650 4 $a Advocacy. $3 3435348
650 4 $a Reflective teaching. $3 581131
650 4 $a Planning. $3 552734
650 4 $a Professional practice. $3 3560021
650 4 $a Knowledge. $3 872758
650 4 $a Preschool education. $3 3422453
650 4 $a Librarians. $3 3399392
650 4 $a Public libraries. $3 1010138
650 4 $a Literacy. $3 528342
653 $a Children's librarianship
653 $a Design
653 $a Professional development
653 $a Reflection
653 $a Storytime
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Information School. $3 2092649
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-03A.
790 $a 0250
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28498336