東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Working Alone Together: Unanticipated Virtual Teams, Best Practices: For a Pandemic.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Working Alone Together: Unanticipated Virtual Teams, Best Practices: For a Pandemic./
作者:	Douglas, Francis.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	265 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-02B.
標題:	Business administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28546215
ISBN:	9798516965883

Working Alone Together: Unanticipated Virtual Teams, Best Practices: For a Pandemic.
Douglas, Francis.

Working Alone Together: Unanticipated Virtual Teams, Best Practices: For a Pandemic. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 265 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--University of Maryland University College, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This research effort presents a systematic review of high-quality, scholarly research applicable to a new type of virtual team, Unanticipated Virtual Teams (UVT), that were triggered by the recent coronavirus pandemic and, as such, have not previously been the focus of scholarly research. These teams were co-located teams that were sent home to telework and social distance while using electronic methods to communicate and continue work. The systematic review-done in alignment with the methods presented D. Denyer and D. Tranfield (2009) (pp. 671-689)-extends the research of Chatfield et al., (2014), Caya et al. (2013), and Purvanova and Kenda (2018). This review identifies best practices, as defined through a lens of paradox theory, within the research on ad hoc, hybrid, global, and other types of virtual teams and synthesizes those practices to assist practitioners struggling with UVTs while trying to produce high-quality products and services in a business environment. In addition, research on telecommuting and teleworking was explored for similar best practices. In total, 110 articles published in peer-reviewed scholarship since 2013 are synthesized. As a result, 70 best practices are identified and synthesized, mitigating or moderating the challenges of 17 paradoxes for the practitioner. In addition, two methods identify common elements of these best practices that are the foundation for anticipating additional paradoxes or virtual team challenges: First, five decision-makers and two common methods are identified because they mitigate the challenges of all 17 paradoxes. The second offers seven specific meta-practices that similarly mitigate the 17 paradoxes. In addition, this effort presents the first historical comparison of virtual and telework research against the development of information and communication technology (ICT) tools and presents a typology of 14 different types of virtual teams in scholarly literature. Practitioners are offered a wide range of solutions to the challenges facing UVTs. A paradox-focused research agenda is also offered.

ISBN: 9798516965883Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168311
Business administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Pandemic

Working Alone Together: Unanticipated Virtual Teams, Best Practices: For a Pandemic.
LDR:03283nmm a2200397 4500 001 2342218
005 20211209144713.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798516965883
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28546215
035 $a AAI28546215
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Douglas, Francis. $3 3680545
245 1 0 $a Working Alone Together: Unanticipated Virtual Teams, Best Practices: For a Pandemic.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 265 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Wagner, Wanda.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--University of Maryland University College, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This research effort presents a systematic review of high-quality, scholarly research applicable to a new type of virtual team, Unanticipated Virtual Teams (UVT), that were triggered by the recent coronavirus pandemic and, as such, have not previously been the focus of scholarly research. These teams were co-located teams that were sent home to telework and social distance while using electronic methods to communicate and continue work. The systematic review-done in alignment with the methods presented D. Denyer and D. Tranfield (2009) (pp. 671-689)-extends the research of Chatfield et al., (2014), Caya et al. (2013), and Purvanova and Kenda (2018). This review identifies best practices, as defined through a lens of paradox theory, within the research on ad hoc, hybrid, global, and other types of virtual teams and synthesizes those practices to assist practitioners struggling with UVTs while trying to produce high-quality products and services in a business environment. In addition, research on telecommuting and teleworking was explored for similar best practices. In total, 110 articles published in peer-reviewed scholarship since 2013 are synthesized. As a result, 70 best practices are identified and synthesized, mitigating or moderating the challenges of 17 paradoxes for the practitioner. In addition, two methods identify common elements of these best practices that are the foundation for anticipating additional paradoxes or virtual team challenges: First, five decision-makers and two common methods are identified because they mitigate the challenges of all 17 paradoxes. The second offers seven specific meta-practices that similarly mitigate the 17 paradoxes. In addition, this effort presents the first historical comparison of virtual and telework research against the development of information and communication technology (ICT) tools and presents a typology of 14 different types of virtual teams in scholarly literature. Practitioners are offered a wide range of solutions to the challenges facing UVTs. A paradox-focused research agenda is also offered.
590 $a School code: 1487.
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 3168311
650 4 $a Virtual teams. $3 3680546
650 4 $a Culture. $3 517003
650 4 $a Virtual private networks. $3 3680547
650 4 $a Time zones. $3 3680548
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Hypotheses. $3 3560118
650 4 $a Intervention. $3 3435307
650 4 $a Pandemics. $3 3464080
650 4 $a Trust. $3 536251
650 4 $a Research & development--R&D. $3 3554335
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 532993
650 4 $a Coronaviruses. $3 894828
650 4 $a Systematic review. $3 3680549
650 4 $a COVID-19. $3 3554449
653 $a Pandemic
653 $a Paradox
653 $a Team
653 $a Telecommute
653 $a Telework
653 $a Virtual
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0459
710 2 $a University of Maryland University College. $b School of Business. $3 3544209
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-02B.
790 $a 1487
791 $a D.B.A.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28546215