東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

People, parks, and power = the ethic...

Sapignoli, Maria.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

People, parks, and power = the ethics of conservation-related resettlement /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	People, parks, and power/ by Maria Sapignoli, Robert K. Hitchcock.
其他題名:	the ethics of conservation-related resettlement /
作者:	Sapignoli, Maria.
其他作者:	Hitchcock, Robert K.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2023.,
面頁冊數:	xxxiii, 101 p. :illustrations, digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Biodiversity Conservation, Protected Areas, and Indigenous Peoples -- Fortress Conservation: Removals of Indigenous People from Protected Areas in the United States -- Coercive Conservation: Removals of Indigenous Peoples from Protected Areas in Southern Africa -- Social Impacts of Conservation-Forced Resettlement -- Indigenous Peoples' Strategies for Coping with Protected Area Policies and Treatment -- Conservation, Ethics, and Indigenous Peoples.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Indigenous peoples - Land tenure. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39268-9
ISBN:	9783031392689

People, parks, and power = the ethics of conservation-related resettlement /
Sapignoli, Maria.

People, parks, and powerthe ethics of conservation-related resettlement /[electronic resource] :by Maria Sapignoli, Robert K. Hitchcock. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023. - xxxiii, 101 p. :illustrations, digital ;24 cm. - Anthropology and ethics,2195-0830. - Anthropology and ethics..

Biodiversity Conservation, Protected Areas, and Indigenous Peoples -- Fortress Conservation: Removals of Indigenous People from Protected Areas in the United States -- Coercive Conservation: Removals of Indigenous Peoples from Protected Areas in Southern Africa -- Social Impacts of Conservation-Forced Resettlement -- Indigenous Peoples' Strategies for Coping with Protected Area Policies and Treatment -- Conservation, Ethics, and Indigenous Peoples.

This book presents a critical review of the ethics of conservation-related resettlement. We examine what has become known as the" parks versus people" debate, also known as the "new conservation debate," which has pitted indigenous and other local people against nation states and social scientists against ecologists and conservationists for the past several decades. Aiming to promote biodiversity conservation and habitat preservation, some biologists, park planners, and conservation organizations have recommended that indigenous and other people should be removed from protected areas. Local people, for their part, have argued that residents of the areas that were turned into protected areas, national parks, game reserves and monuments had managed them in productive ways for generations and that they should have the right to remain there and to use natural resources as long as they do so sustainably. This position is often supported by indigenous rights organizations and social scientists, especially anthropologists. There are also some conservation-oriented NGOs that have policies involving a more human rights-oriented approach aimed at poverty alleviation, sustainable development, and social justice. The book discusses biodiversity conservation, indigenous peoples (those who are ethnic minorities and who are often marginalized politically), and protected areas, those categories of land set aside by nation-states that have various kinds of rules about land use and residence. The focus initially is on case studies from protected areas in the United States including Yellowstone National Park, Yosemite National Park, and Glacier National Park and on national monuments and historical parks where resettlement took place. We then consider issues of coercive conservation in southern Africa, including Hwange National Park (Zimbabwe), the Central Kalahari Game Reserve (Botswana), Etosha National Park, and Bwabwata National Park (Namibia), and Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (South Africa and Botswana) All of these cases involved involuntary resettlement at the hands of the governments. In the book we consider some of the social impacts of conservation-forced resettlement (CfR), many of which tend to be negative. After that, we assess some of the strategies employed by indigenous peoples in their efforts to recover rights of access to protected areas and the cultural and natural resources that they contain. Examples are drawn from cases in Asia, Africa, and South America. Conclusions are provided regarding the ethics of conservation-related resettlement and some of the best practices that could be followed, particularly with regard to indigenous peoples.

ISBN: 9783031392689

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-39268-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

699498
Indigenous peoples
--Land tenure.

LC Class. No.: SB486.S65

Dewey Class. No.: 333.783

People, parks, and power = the ethics of conservation-related resettlement /
LDR:04231nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2335863
003 DE-He213
005 20231108122536.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 240402s2023 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031392689 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031392665 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-39268-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-39268-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a SB486.S65
072 7 $a JHM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SOC002000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JHM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 333.783 $2 23
090 $a SB486.S65 $b S241 2023
100 1 $a Sapignoli, Maria. $3 3668568
245 1 0 $a People, parks, and power $h [electronic resource] : $b the ethics of conservation-related resettlement / $c by Maria Sapignoli, Robert K. Hitchcock.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2023.
300 $a xxxiii, 101 p. : $b illustrations, digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Anthropology and ethics, $x 2195-0830
505 0 $a Biodiversity Conservation, Protected Areas, and Indigenous Peoples -- Fortress Conservation: Removals of Indigenous People from Protected Areas in the United States -- Coercive Conservation: Removals of Indigenous Peoples from Protected Areas in Southern Africa -- Social Impacts of Conservation-Forced Resettlement -- Indigenous Peoples' Strategies for Coping with Protected Area Policies and Treatment -- Conservation, Ethics, and Indigenous Peoples.
520 $a This book presents a critical review of the ethics of conservation-related resettlement. We examine what has become known as the" parks versus people" debate, also known as the "new conservation debate," which has pitted indigenous and other local people against nation states and social scientists against ecologists and conservationists for the past several decades. Aiming to promote biodiversity conservation and habitat preservation, some biologists, park planners, and conservation organizations have recommended that indigenous and other people should be removed from protected areas. Local people, for their part, have argued that residents of the areas that were turned into protected areas, national parks, game reserves and monuments had managed them in productive ways for generations and that they should have the right to remain there and to use natural resources as long as they do so sustainably. This position is often supported by indigenous rights organizations and social scientists, especially anthropologists. There are also some conservation-oriented NGOs that have policies involving a more human rights-oriented approach aimed at poverty alleviation, sustainable development, and social justice. The book discusses biodiversity conservation, indigenous peoples (those who are ethnic minorities and who are often marginalized politically), and protected areas, those categories of land set aside by nation-states that have various kinds of rules about land use and residence. The focus initially is on case studies from protected areas in the United States including Yellowstone National Park, Yosemite National Park, and Glacier National Park and on national monuments and historical parks where resettlement took place. We then consider issues of coercive conservation in southern Africa, including Hwange National Park (Zimbabwe), the Central Kalahari Game Reserve (Botswana), Etosha National Park, and Bwabwata National Park (Namibia), and Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (South Africa and Botswana) All of these cases involved involuntary resettlement at the hands of the governments. In the book we consider some of the social impacts of conservation-forced resettlement (CfR), many of which tend to be negative. After that, we assess some of the strategies employed by indigenous peoples in their efforts to recover rights of access to protected areas and the cultural and natural resources that they contain. Examples are drawn from cases in Asia, Africa, and South America. Conclusions are provided regarding the ethics of conservation-related resettlement and some of the best practices that could be followed, particularly with regard to indigenous peoples.
650 0 $a Indigenous peoples $x Land tenure. $3 699498
650 0 $a Environmental protection $x Moral and ethical aspects. $3 587520
650 0 $a National parks and reserves $x Social aspects. $3 570586
650 0 $a National parks and reserves $x Government policy. $3 688100
650 0 $a Protected areas $x Social aspects. $3 1982275
650 0 $a Protected areas $x Government policy. $3 1048551
650 0 $a National parks and reserves $v Case studies. $3 3668570
650 0 $a Protected areas $v Case studies. $3 3668571
650 1 4 $a Anthropology. $3 517996
650 2 4 $a Conservation Biology. $3 3538459
650 2 4 $a Community and Population Ecology. $3 3594187
700 1 $a Hitchcock, Robert K. $3 905218
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Anthropology and ethics. $3 3668569
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39268-9
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (SpringerNature-41168)