東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The burden of proof upon metaphysica...

Rhode, Conny.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The burden of proof upon metaphysical methods

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The burden of proof upon metaphysical methods/ by Conny Rhode.
作者:	Rhode, Conny.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2023.,
面頁冊數:	xvii, 205 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	1. Dialogue and Persuasion -- 2. The Burden of Proof -- 3. Evidence, Inference and Empiricism -- 4. Philosophical Methods between Content and the World -- 5. Metaphysical Hypotheses -- 6. Escaping Dialogical Empiricism.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Analysis (Philosophy) -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27777-1
ISBN:	9783031277771

The burden of proof upon metaphysical methods
Rhode, Conny.

The burden of proof upon metaphysical methods[electronic resource] /by Conny Rhode. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023. - xvii, 205 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Dialogue and Persuasion -- 2. The Burden of Proof -- 3. Evidence, Inference and Empiricism -- 4. Philosophical Methods between Content and the World -- 5. Metaphysical Hypotheses -- 6. Escaping Dialogical Empiricism.

Who carries the burden of proof in analytic philosophical debates, and how can this burden be satisfied? As it turns out, the answer to this joint question yields a fundamental challenge to the very conduct of metaphysics in analytic philosophy. Empirical research presented in this book indicates that the vastly predominant goal pursued in analytic philosophical dialogues lies not in discovering truths or generating knowledge, but merely in prevailing over one's opponents. Given this goal, the book examines how most effectively to allocate and discharge the burden of proof. It focuses on premises that must prudently be avoided because a burden of proof on them could never be satisfied, and in particular discusses unsupportable bridge premises across inference barriers, like Hume's barrier between 'is' and 'ought', or the barrier between the content of our talk or thought, and the world beyond such content. Employing this content/world barrier for a critical assessment of mainstream analytic philosophical methods, this book argues that we must prudently avoid invoking intuitions or other content of thought or talk in support of claims about the world beyond content, that is, metaphysically significant claims. Yet as content-located evidence is practically indispensable to metaphysical debates throughout analytic philosophy, from ethics to the philosophy of mathematics, this book reaches the startling conclusion that all such metaphysical debates must, prudently, be terminated. Conny Rhode's research at the University of York focused on philosophical methodology and argumentation theory, beside forays into the philosophy of science, post-Kantian philosophy, and political and moral philosophy, often employing a feminist perspective. In light of the conclusion derived in this book, Rhode has left academic philosophy and now insists on appropriate evidence in accountancy instead.

ISBN: 9783031277771

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-27777-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

558045
Analysis (Philosophy)

LC Class. No.: B808.5 / .R46 2023

Dewey Class. No.: 146.4

The burden of proof upon metaphysical methods
LDR:03093nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2318223
003 DE-He213
005 20230503161129.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 230902s2023 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031277771 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031277764 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-27777-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-27777-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a B808.5 $b .R46 2023
072 7 $a HPJ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI013000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTJ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 146.4 $2 23
090 $a B808.5 $b .R475 2023
100 1 $a Rhode, Conny. $3 3633021
245 1 4 $a The burden of proof upon metaphysical methods $h [electronic resource] / $c by Conny Rhode.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2023.
300 $a xvii, 205 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. Dialogue and Persuasion -- 2. The Burden of Proof -- 3. Evidence, Inference and Empiricism -- 4. Philosophical Methods between Content and the World -- 5. Metaphysical Hypotheses -- 6. Escaping Dialogical Empiricism.
520 $a Who carries the burden of proof in analytic philosophical debates, and how can this burden be satisfied? As it turns out, the answer to this joint question yields a fundamental challenge to the very conduct of metaphysics in analytic philosophy. Empirical research presented in this book indicates that the vastly predominant goal pursued in analytic philosophical dialogues lies not in discovering truths or generating knowledge, but merely in prevailing over one's opponents. Given this goal, the book examines how most effectively to allocate and discharge the burden of proof. It focuses on premises that must prudently be avoided because a burden of proof on them could never be satisfied, and in particular discusses unsupportable bridge premises across inference barriers, like Hume's barrier between 'is' and 'ought', or the barrier between the content of our talk or thought, and the world beyond such content. Employing this content/world barrier for a critical assessment of mainstream analytic philosophical methods, this book argues that we must prudently avoid invoking intuitions or other content of thought or talk in support of claims about the world beyond content, that is, metaphysically significant claims. Yet as content-located evidence is practically indispensable to metaphysical debates throughout analytic philosophy, from ethics to the philosophy of mathematics, this book reaches the startling conclusion that all such metaphysical debates must, prudently, be terminated. Conny Rhode's research at the University of York focused on philosophical methodology and argumentation theory, beside forays into the philosophy of science, post-Kantian philosophy, and political and moral philosophy, often employing a feminist perspective. In light of the conclusion derived in this book, Rhode has left academic philosophy and now insists on appropriate evidence in accountancy instead.
650 0 $a Analysis (Philosophy) $3 558045
650 0 $a Metaphysics $x Methodology. $3 3633022
650 1 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
650 2 4 $a Philosophical Methods. $3 3593934
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27777-1
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)