東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Analysis of legal argumentation docu...

Hirata, Hayato.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Analysis of legal argumentation documents = a computational argumentation approach /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Analysis of legal argumentation documents/ by Hayato Hirata, Katsumi Nitta.
其他題名:	a computational argumentation approach /
作者:	Hirata, Hayato.
其他作者:	Nitta, Katsumi.
出版者:	Singapore :Springer Nature Singapore : : 2022.,
面頁冊數:	xiii, 155 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Chapter 1. Introduction-- Chapter 2. Related Research -- Chapter 3 -- Factor-Based Argumentation Evaluation -- Chapter 4. Case Analysis Using Factors and Legal Topoi -- Chapter 5. Case Analysis for Case Law Education using Factors and Computational Argumentation Theory -- Chapter 6. Conclusion.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Technology and law. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2928-1
ISBN:	9789811929281

Analysis of legal argumentation documents = a computational argumentation approach /
Hirata, Hayato.

Analysis of legal argumentation documentsa computational argumentation approach /[electronic resource] :by Hayato Hirata, Katsumi Nitta. - Singapore :Springer Nature Singapore :2022. - xiii, 155 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Translational systems sciences,v. 292197-8840 ;. - Translational systems sciences ;v. 29..

Chapter 1. Introduction-- Chapter 2. Related Research -- Chapter 3 -- Factor-Based Argumentation Evaluation -- Chapter 4. Case Analysis Using Factors and Legal Topoi -- Chapter 5. Case Analysis for Case Law Education using Factors and Computational Argumentation Theory -- Chapter 6. Conclusion.

This book introduces methods to analyze legal documents such as negotiation records and legal precedents, using computational argumentation theory. First, a method to automatically evaluate argumentation skills from the records of argumentation exercises is proposed. In law school, argumentation exercises are often conducted and many records of them are produced. From each utterance in the record, a pattern of "speech act +factor" is extracted, and argumentation skills are evaluated from the sequences of the patterns, using a scoring prediction model constructed by multiple regression analyses between the appearance pattern and the scoring results. The usefulness of this method is shown by applying it to the example case "the garbage house problem". Second, a method of extracting factors (elements that characterize precedents and cases) and legal topoi from individual precedents and using them as the expression of precedents to analyze how the pattern of factors and legal topoi appearing in a group of precedents affects the judgment (plaintiff wins/defendant wins) is proposed. This method has been applied to a group of tax cases. Third, the logical structure of 70 labor cases is described in detail by using factors and a bipolar argumentation framework (BAF) and an (extended argumentation framework (EAF) together. BAF describes the logical structure between plaintiff and defendant, and EAF describes the decision of the judge. Incorporating the legal topoi into the EAF of computational argumentation theory, the strength of the analysis of precedents by combined use of factored BAF and EAF, not only which argument the judge adopted could be specified. It was also possible to determine what kind of value judgment was made and to verify the logic. The analysis methods in this book demonstrate the application of logic-based AI methods to the legal domain, and they contribute to the education and training of law school students in logical ways of argumentation.

ISBN: 9789811929281

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-981-19-2928-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

745929
Technology and law.

LC Class. No.: K487.T4

Dewey Class. No.: 344.095

Analysis of legal argumentation documents = a computational argumentation approach /
LDR:03390nmm a2200349 a 4500 001 2303366
003 DE-He213
005 20220812134807.0
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 230409s2022 si s 0 eng d
020 $a 9789811929281 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9789811929274 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-981-19-2928-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-981-19-2928-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K487.T4
072 7 $a LNH $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LNT $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW054000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LNH $2 thema
072 7 $a LNT $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 344.095 $2 23
090 $a K487.T4 $b H668 2022
100 1 $a Hirata, Hayato. $3 3604556
245 1 0 $a Analysis of legal argumentation documents $h [electronic resource] : $b a computational argumentation approach / $c by Hayato Hirata, Katsumi Nitta.
260 $a Singapore : $b Springer Nature Singapore : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2022.
300 $a xiii, 155 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Translational systems sciences, $x 2197-8840 ; $v v. 29
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Introduction-- Chapter 2. Related Research -- Chapter 3 -- Factor-Based Argumentation Evaluation -- Chapter 4. Case Analysis Using Factors and Legal Topoi -- Chapter 5. Case Analysis for Case Law Education using Factors and Computational Argumentation Theory -- Chapter 6. Conclusion.
520 $a This book introduces methods to analyze legal documents such as negotiation records and legal precedents, using computational argumentation theory. First, a method to automatically evaluate argumentation skills from the records of argumentation exercises is proposed. In law school, argumentation exercises are often conducted and many records of them are produced. From each utterance in the record, a pattern of "speech act +factor" is extracted, and argumentation skills are evaluated from the sequences of the patterns, using a scoring prediction model constructed by multiple regression analyses between the appearance pattern and the scoring results. The usefulness of this method is shown by applying it to the example case "the garbage house problem". Second, a method of extracting factors (elements that characterize precedents and cases) and legal topoi from individual precedents and using them as the expression of precedents to analyze how the pattern of factors and legal topoi appearing in a group of precedents affects the judgment (plaintiff wins/defendant wins) is proposed. This method has been applied to a group of tax cases. Third, the logical structure of 70 labor cases is described in detail by using factors and a bipolar argumentation framework (BAF) and an (extended argumentation framework (EAF) together. BAF describes the logical structure between plaintiff and defendant, and EAF describes the decision of the judge. Incorporating the legal topoi into the EAF of computational argumentation theory, the strength of the analysis of precedents by combined use of factored BAF and EAF, not only which argument the judge adopted could be specified. It was also possible to determine what kind of value judgment was made and to verify the logic. The analysis methods in this book demonstrate the application of logic-based AI methods to the legal domain, and they contribute to the education and training of law school students in logical ways of argumentation.
650 0 $a Technology and law. $3 745929
650 0 $a Law firms $x Technological innovations. $3 3604559
650 0 $a Artificial intelligence $x Law and legislation. $3 2071930
650 1 4 $a Labour Law/Social Law. $3 897101
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 1565627
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Law. $3 893937
650 2 4 $a Artificial Intelligence. $3 769149
700 1 $a Nitta, Katsumi. $3 3604557
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Translational systems sciences ; $v v. 29. $3 3604558
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2928-1
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)