東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Logic without gaps or gluts = how to...

Burgis, Benjamin Alan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Logic without gaps or gluts = how to solve the paradoxes without sacrificing classical logic /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Logic without gaps or gluts/ by Benjamin Alan Burgis.
其他題名:	how to solve the paradoxes without sacrificing classical logic /
作者:	Burgis, Benjamin Alan.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2022.,
面頁冊數:	vii, 189 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Chapter 1. Logic and the Liar Paradox -- Chapter 2. Graham Priest and Dialetheism -- Chapter 3. How to Solve Priest's Paradoxes Without Sacrificing Classical Logic -- Chapter 4. Dialetheism and the Laws of Logic -- Chapter 5. Dialetheism, Rejection, and Curry's Paradox -- Chapter 6. Dialetheism, Rejection, and Probability Theory -- Chapter 7. Hartry Field and Paracompleteness -- Chapter 8. How to Solve the Liar Paradox Without Sacrificing Classical Logic -- Index.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Logic. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94624-1
ISBN:	9783030946241

Logic without gaps or gluts = how to solve the paradoxes without sacrificing classical logic /
Burgis, Benjamin Alan.

Logic without gaps or glutshow to solve the paradoxes without sacrificing classical logic /[electronic resource] :by Benjamin Alan Burgis. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022. - vii, 189 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Synthese library, studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science,v. 4582542-8292 ;. - Synthese library, studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science ;v. 458..

Chapter 1. Logic and the Liar Paradox -- Chapter 2. Graham Priest and Dialetheism -- Chapter 3. How to Solve Priest's Paradoxes Without Sacrificing Classical Logic -- Chapter 4. Dialetheism and the Laws of Logic -- Chapter 5. Dialetheism, Rejection, and Curry's Paradox -- Chapter 6. Dialetheism, Rejection, and Probability Theory -- Chapter 7. Hartry Field and Paracompleteness -- Chapter 8. How to Solve the Liar Paradox Without Sacrificing Classical Logic -- Index.

This book offers a defense against non-classical approaches to the paradoxes. The author argues that, despite appearances, the paradoxes give no reason at all to reject classical logic. In fact, he believes classical solutions fare better than non-classical ones with respect to key tests like Curry's Paradox, a Liar-like paradox that dialetheists are forced to solve in a way totally disjoint from their solution to the Liar. Graham Priest's In Contradiction was the first major work that advocated the use of non-classical approaches. Since then, these views have moved into the philosophical mainstream. Much of this movement is fueled by a widespread sense that these logically heterodox solutions get to the real nub of the issue. They lack the ad hoc feel of many other solutions to the paradoxes. The author believes that it's long past time for a response to these attacks against classical orthodoxy. He presents a non-logically-revisionary solution to the paradoxes. This title offers a literal way of cashing out the disquotation metaphor. While the details of the view are novel, the idea has a pre-history in the relevant literature. The author examines objections in detail. He rejects each in turn and concludes by comparing the virtues of his logically orthodox approach with those of the paraconsistent and paracomplete competition.

ISBN: 9783030946241

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-94624-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

529544
Logic.

LC Class. No.: BC108

Dewey Class. No.: 160

Logic without gaps or gluts = how to solve the paradoxes without sacrificing classical logic /
LDR:02953nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2299448
003 DE-He213
005 20220225183639.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 230324s2022 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030946241 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030946234 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-94624-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-94624-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BC108
072 7 $a HPL $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI011000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTL $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 160 $2 23
090 $a BC108 $b .B956 2022
100 1 $a Burgis, Benjamin Alan. $3 3596899
245 1 0 $a Logic without gaps or gluts $h [electronic resource] : $b how to solve the paradoxes without sacrificing classical logic / $c by Benjamin Alan Burgis.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2022.
300 $a vii, 189 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Synthese library, studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science, $x 2542-8292 ; $v v. 458
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Logic and the Liar Paradox -- Chapter 2. Graham Priest and Dialetheism -- Chapter 3. How to Solve Priest's Paradoxes Without Sacrificing Classical Logic -- Chapter 4. Dialetheism and the Laws of Logic -- Chapter 5. Dialetheism, Rejection, and Curry's Paradox -- Chapter 6. Dialetheism, Rejection, and Probability Theory -- Chapter 7. Hartry Field and Paracompleteness -- Chapter 8. How to Solve the Liar Paradox Without Sacrificing Classical Logic -- Index.
520 $a This book offers a defense against non-classical approaches to the paradoxes. The author argues that, despite appearances, the paradoxes give no reason at all to reject classical logic. In fact, he believes classical solutions fare better than non-classical ones with respect to key tests like Curry's Paradox, a Liar-like paradox that dialetheists are forced to solve in a way totally disjoint from their solution to the Liar. Graham Priest's In Contradiction was the first major work that advocated the use of non-classical approaches. Since then, these views have moved into the philosophical mainstream. Much of this movement is fueled by a widespread sense that these logically heterodox solutions get to the real nub of the issue. They lack the ad hoc feel of many other solutions to the paradoxes. The author believes that it's long past time for a response to these attacks against classical orthodoxy. He presents a non-logically-revisionary solution to the paradoxes. This title offers a literal way of cashing out the disquotation metaphor. While the details of the view are novel, the idea has a pre-history in the relevant literature. The author examines objections in detail. He rejects each in turn and concludes by comparing the virtues of his logically orthodox approach with those of the paraconsistent and paracomplete competition.
650 0 $a Logic. $3 529544
650 0 $a Thought and thinking. $3 517849
650 2 4 $a Mathematical Logic and Foundations. $3 892656
650 2 4 $a Analytic Philosophy. $3 2182031
650 2 4 $a Biotechnology. $3 571461
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Synthese library, studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science ; $v v. 458. $3 3596900
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94624-1
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)