東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Relationship of General Athletic Per...

Scruggs, Steven Keith, II.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Relationship of General Athletic Performance Markers to Intra-Team Ranking of Sport Performance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Relationship of General Athletic Performance Markers to Intra-Team Ranking of Sport Performance./
作者:	Scruggs, Steven Keith, II.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	139 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-03B.
標題:	Physical education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28416892
ISBN:	9798538140947

Relationship of General Athletic Performance Markers to Intra-Team Ranking of Sport Performance.
Scruggs, Steven Keith, II.

Relationship of General Athletic Performance Markers to Intra-Team Ranking of Sport Performance. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 139 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Carolina, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

A foundational principle in sport science involves applying an evidence-based approach to training and development of athletes. The primary objective is to provide an effective training program, while monitoring general athletic performance (GAP) development (i.e., athlete-monitoring), ensuring intended adaptations are occurring. Much of the literature has focused on GAP markers (e.g., physical qualities related to strength, speed, power, agility, and endurance) which are only suggested to influence competitive sport performance (SP) outcomes (e.g., yards per carry, batting average, hitting percentage, rank or placement, etc.; B. Alejo, personal communication, July 13, 2019). This gap in the literature should be filled via examination of motor control principles and theories (i.e., impulse-variability theory) as it relates to GAP and SP. The work presented herein focuses on investigating the relationship of non-traditional GAP markers (e.g., squat jump peak velocity and impulse-momentum) and tenants of the impulse-variability theory to SP outcomes (e.g., intra-team rank of SP and starter vs non-starter group membership) in an elite (e.g., top 8 nationally ranked) NCAA DI beach volleyball team (n = 20; age = 19.75 ± 1.52; height = 173.32 ± 6.49 cm). The first study examined associations between traditional and non-traditional maximal output GAP markers to each other, as well as associations and contribution of GAP markers to SP outcomes (e.g., intra-team rank of SP and group membership). Results demonstrate strong associations between traditional and non-traditional GAP markers, while non-traditional demonstrated strong association and independent contribution to SP outcomes. Intra-set jump-based GAP variability (i.e., variable error) was examined in study two where only squat jump peak velocity variability demonstrated strong association and contribution to SP group membership. Study three examined predictive utility of the combined effects of maximal output GAP markers and jump-based GAP variability to SP group membership. Results demonstrated squat jump peak velocity maximum and variability correctly classified SP group membership at a 100% success rate. Overall, these data suggest non-traditional GAP maximal output and variability provide strong predictive utility to SP group membership. Future research should examine the generalizable utility of impulse-variability theory as it relates to GAP development (e.g., physical education to elite athletes) and SP outcomes.

ISBN: 9798538140947Subjects--Topical Terms:

635343
Physical education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Athletics

Relationship of General Athletic Performance Markers to Intra-Team Ranking of Sport Performance.
LDR:03724nmm a2200397 4500 001 2285346
005 20211129133344.5
008 220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798538140947
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28416892
035 $a AAI28416892
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Scruggs, Steven Keith, II. $3 3564644
245 1 0 $a Relationship of General Athletic Performance Markers to Intra-Team Ranking of Sport Performance.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 139 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Stodden, David F.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Carolina, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a A foundational principle in sport science involves applying an evidence-based approach to training and development of athletes. The primary objective is to provide an effective training program, while monitoring general athletic performance (GAP) development (i.e., athlete-monitoring), ensuring intended adaptations are occurring. Much of the literature has focused on GAP markers (e.g., physical qualities related to strength, speed, power, agility, and endurance) which are only suggested to influence competitive sport performance (SP) outcomes (e.g., yards per carry, batting average, hitting percentage, rank or placement, etc.; B. Alejo, personal communication, July 13, 2019). This gap in the literature should be filled via examination of motor control principles and theories (i.e., impulse-variability theory) as it relates to GAP and SP. The work presented herein focuses on investigating the relationship of non-traditional GAP markers (e.g., squat jump peak velocity and impulse-momentum) and tenants of the impulse-variability theory to SP outcomes (e.g., intra-team rank of SP and starter vs non-starter group membership) in an elite (e.g., top 8 nationally ranked) NCAA DI beach volleyball team (n = 20; age = 19.75 ± 1.52; height = 173.32 ± 6.49 cm). The first study examined associations between traditional and non-traditional maximal output GAP markers to each other, as well as associations and contribution of GAP markers to SP outcomes (e.g., intra-team rank of SP and group membership). Results demonstrate strong associations between traditional and non-traditional GAP markers, while non-traditional demonstrated strong association and independent contribution to SP outcomes. Intra-set jump-based GAP variability (i.e., variable error) was examined in study two where only squat jump peak velocity variability demonstrated strong association and contribution to SP group membership. Study three examined predictive utility of the combined effects of maximal output GAP markers and jump-based GAP variability to SP group membership. Results demonstrated squat jump peak velocity maximum and variability correctly classified SP group membership at a 100% success rate. Overall, these data suggest non-traditional GAP maximal output and variability provide strong predictive utility to SP group membership. Future research should examine the generalizable utility of impulse-variability theory as it relates to GAP development (e.g., physical education to elite athletes) and SP outcomes.
590 $a School code: 0202.
650 4 $a Physical education. $3 635343
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 517627
650 4 $a Physiology. $3 518431
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
653 $a Athletics
653 $a Impulse
653 $a Sports
653 $a Variability
653 $a Velocity
653 $a Volleyball
690 $a 0523
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0719
690 $a 0459
710 2 $a University of South Carolina. $b Physical Education. $3 1018020
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-03B.
790 $a 0202
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28416892