語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
查詢
薦購
讀者園地
我的帳戶
說明
簡單查詢
進階查詢
圖書館推薦圖書
讀者推薦圖書(公開)
教師指定參考書
借閱排行榜
預約排行榜
分類瀏覽
展示書
專題書單RSS
個人資料
個人檢索策略
個人薦購
借閱紀錄/續借/預約
個人評論
個人書籤
東區互惠借書
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Successful Failures and Failed Succe...
~
Passantino, Laurel Brooke.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Successful Failures and Failed Successes: Untangling the Obstacles Facing Collaborative Proposal Writing.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Successful Failures and Failed Successes: Untangling the Obstacles Facing Collaborative Proposal Writing./
作者:
Passantino, Laurel Brooke.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:
144 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International82-11B.
標題:
Engineering. -
電子資源:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28409936
ISBN:
9798728266549
Successful Failures and Failed Successes: Untangling the Obstacles Facing Collaborative Proposal Writing.
Passantino, Laurel Brooke.
Successful Failures and Failed Successes: Untangling the Obstacles Facing Collaborative Proposal Writing.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 144 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2021.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
The first task faced by many teams endeavoring to solve complex scientific problems is to seek funding for their research venture. Often, this necessitates forming new, geographically dispersed teams of researchers from multiple disciplines. While the team science and organizational management fields have studied project teams extensively, nascent teams are underrepresented in the literature. Nonetheless, understanding proposal team dynamics is important because if left unaddressed, obstacles may persist beyond the funding decision and undermine the possibility of team successes adjunctive to funding.Participant observation of more than 100 multi-investigator proposal teams and semi-structured interviews with six leaders of multidisciplinary proposal teams identified investigator motivations for collaboration, obstacles to collaboration, and indicators of proposal team success. The motivations ranged from technical interests in the research question to a desire to have impact beyond oneself. The obstacles included inconsistent or non-existent communication protocols, unclear processes for producing and reviewing documents, ad hoc file and citation management systems, short and stressful time horizons, ambiguous decision-making procedures, and uncertainty in establishing a shared vision. While funding outcome was the most objective indicator of a proposal team's success, other success indicators emerged, including whether the needs of the team member(s) had been met and the willingness of team members to continue collaborating. This multi-dimensional definition of success makes it possible for teams to simultaneously be considered successes and failures.As a framework to analyze and overcome obstacles, this work turned to the United States military's command and control (C2) approach, which relies on specifying the following elements to increase an organization's agility: patterns of interaction, distribution of information, and allocation of decision rights. To address disciplinary differences and varied motivations for collaboration, this work added a fourth element: shared meaning-making.The broader impact of this work is that by implementing a C2 framework to uncover and address obstacles, the proposal experience-from team creation, to idea generation, to document creation, to final submittal-becomes more rewarding for faculty, leading to greater job satisfaction. This in turn will change how university research enterprises create, organize, and share knowledge to solve complex problems in the post-industrial information age.
ISBN: 9798728266549Subjects--Topical Terms:
586835
Engineering.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Collaboration
Successful Failures and Failed Successes: Untangling the Obstacles Facing Collaborative Proposal Writing.
LDR
:03755nmm a2200373 4500
001
2284754
005
20211124102955.5
008
220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798728266549
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28409936
035
$a
AAI28409936
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Passantino, Laurel Brooke.
$3
3563938
245
1 0
$a
Successful Failures and Failed Successes: Untangling the Obstacles Facing Collaborative Proposal Writing.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2021
300
$a
144 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisor: Seager, Thomas P.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2021.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
The first task faced by many teams endeavoring to solve complex scientific problems is to seek funding for their research venture. Often, this necessitates forming new, geographically dispersed teams of researchers from multiple disciplines. While the team science and organizational management fields have studied project teams extensively, nascent teams are underrepresented in the literature. Nonetheless, understanding proposal team dynamics is important because if left unaddressed, obstacles may persist beyond the funding decision and undermine the possibility of team successes adjunctive to funding.Participant observation of more than 100 multi-investigator proposal teams and semi-structured interviews with six leaders of multidisciplinary proposal teams identified investigator motivations for collaboration, obstacles to collaboration, and indicators of proposal team success. The motivations ranged from technical interests in the research question to a desire to have impact beyond oneself. The obstacles included inconsistent or non-existent communication protocols, unclear processes for producing and reviewing documents, ad hoc file and citation management systems, short and stressful time horizons, ambiguous decision-making procedures, and uncertainty in establishing a shared vision. While funding outcome was the most objective indicator of a proposal team's success, other success indicators emerged, including whether the needs of the team member(s) had been met and the willingness of team members to continue collaborating. This multi-dimensional definition of success makes it possible for teams to simultaneously be considered successes and failures.As a framework to analyze and overcome obstacles, this work turned to the United States military's command and control (C2) approach, which relies on specifying the following elements to increase an organization's agility: patterns of interaction, distribution of information, and allocation of decision rights. To address disciplinary differences and varied motivations for collaboration, this work added a fourth element: shared meaning-making.The broader impact of this work is that by implementing a C2 framework to uncover and address obstacles, the proposal experience-from team creation, to idea generation, to document creation, to final submittal-becomes more rewarding for faculty, leading to greater job satisfaction. This in turn will change how university research enterprises create, organize, and share knowledge to solve complex problems in the post-industrial information age.
590
$a
School code: 0010.
650
4
$a
Engineering.
$3
586835
650
4
$a
Technical communication.
$3
3172863
653
$a
Collaboration
653
$a
Command and control
653
$a
Proposal teams
653
$a
Success metrics
690
$a
0635
690
$a
0454
690
$a
0537
690
$a
0643
710
2
$a
Arizona State University.
$b
Sustainable Engineering.
$3
3563939
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
82-11B.
790
$a
0010
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2021
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28409936
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9436487
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入