東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Eu 255 TFEU Panel and the Provin...

Huang, Siyi.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Eu 255 TFEU Panel and the Provincial Judicial Selection Committees in China: A Study on Comparative Judicial Appointments, Market Integration, and Judicial Professionalization.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Eu 255 TFEU Panel and the Provincial Judicial Selection Committees in China: A Study on Comparative Judicial Appointments, Market Integration, and Judicial Professionalization./
Author:	Huang, Siyi.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
Description:	173 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-07A.
Subject:	Asian Studies. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10977680
ISBN:	9780438782662

The Eu 255 TFEU Panel and the Provincial Judicial Selection Committees in China: A Study on Comparative Judicial Appointments, Market Integration, and Judicial Professionalization.
Huang, Siyi.

The Eu 255 TFEU Panel and the Provincial Judicial Selection Committees in China: A Study on Comparative Judicial Appointments, Market Integration, and Judicial Professionalization. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 173 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: A.

Thesis (J.S.D.)--Cornell University, 2018.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

This study focuses on the political logic of the professionally transformed procedures of judicial selection, especially the establishment and operation of special expert advisory panels, as well as its implications on the relationship between judicial professionalization and market integration. In the past decade, there has been a worldwide trend towards the de-politicization and professionalization of the judicial appointment procedure, which has led to renewed debates on this issue. Despite of these largely normative debates, the actual motivations as well as real effects and political implications of this trend are still unclear. This study seeks to bridge this gap by presenting a comparison between the establishment and operation of the 255 TFEU advisory panel ("255 TFEU panel") in the European Union and the Provincial Judicial Selection Commissions ("the PJSCs") in China. Specifically, drawing from experiences and knowledge from China and the European Union, this study argues that both the EU and China have adopted similar programs of judicial professionalization in the current decade due to their common economic pursuit of market integration. Moreover, it is argued that the distinctive paradigms of market integration of the EU and China, i.e., the "courts-driven" and "rules-based" EU model, and the "state-centered" and "centrally-planned" Chinese model, have shaped the very nature, existence and political importance of the 255 TFEU panel and the PJSCs. Upon comparing the similarities and differences in the operation and functioning of the two expert bodies under the context of market integration, it's argued that the different models of market integration of the EU and China have produced different implications for the strategical structural location and roles of the judicial power in the two systems, which in turn explains the different effects and political significance of the 255 TFEU panel and the PJSCs. By doing so, this study seeks to offer a new analytical framework for understanding the relationship of judicial professionalization to market integration, as well as present a welcome addition to the discourse on judicial professionalization and appointments.

ISBN: 9780438782662Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669375
Asian Studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

China

The Eu 255 TFEU Panel and the Provincial Judicial Selection Committees in China: A Study on Comparative Judicial Appointments, Market Integration, and Judicial Professionalization.
LDR:03728nmm a2200421 4500 001 2284478
005 20211123073328.5
008 220723s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438782662
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10977680
035 $a (MiAaPQ)cornellgrad:11169
035 $a AAI10977680
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Huang, Siyi. $3 3563646
245 1 4 $a The Eu 255 TFEU Panel and the Provincial Judicial Selection Committees in China: A Study on Comparative Judicial Appointments, Market Integration, and Judicial Professionalization.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 173 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Lasser, Mitchel.
502 $a Thesis (J.S.D.)--Cornell University, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This study focuses on the political logic of the professionally transformed procedures of judicial selection, especially the establishment and operation of special expert advisory panels, as well as its implications on the relationship between judicial professionalization and market integration. In the past decade, there has been a worldwide trend towards the de-politicization and professionalization of the judicial appointment procedure, which has led to renewed debates on this issue. Despite of these largely normative debates, the actual motivations as well as real effects and political implications of this trend are still unclear. This study seeks to bridge this gap by presenting a comparison between the establishment and operation of the 255 TFEU advisory panel ("255 TFEU panel") in the European Union and the Provincial Judicial Selection Commissions ("the PJSCs") in China. Specifically, drawing from experiences and knowledge from China and the European Union, this study argues that both the EU and China have adopted similar programs of judicial professionalization in the current decade due to their common economic pursuit of market integration. Moreover, it is argued that the distinctive paradigms of market integration of the EU and China, i.e., the "courts-driven" and "rules-based" EU model, and the "state-centered" and "centrally-planned" Chinese model, have shaped the very nature, existence and political importance of the 255 TFEU panel and the PJSCs. Upon comparing the similarities and differences in the operation and functioning of the two expert bodies under the context of market integration, it's argued that the different models of market integration of the EU and China have produced different implications for the strategical structural location and roles of the judicial power in the two systems, which in turn explains the different effects and political significance of the 255 TFEU panel and the PJSCs. By doing so, this study seeks to offer a new analytical framework for understanding the relationship of judicial professionalization to market integration, as well as present a welcome addition to the discourse on judicial professionalization and appointments.
590 $a School code: 0058.
650 4 $a Asian Studies. $3 1669375
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a European Studies. $3 1673271
653 $a China
653 $a Comparative judicial appointments
653 $a EU 255 TFEU panel
653 $a Judicial professionalization
653 $a Market integration
653 $a Provincial judicial selection committees
690 $a 0342
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0440
710 2 $a Cornell University. $b Law. $3 3432005
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-07A.
790 $a 0058
791 $a J.S.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10977680