語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Understanding Academic Advising Prac...
~
Dumont, Kristy Chene.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Understanding Academic Advising Practice: Academic Advisors' Perceived Impact of an Academic Analytics Tool on the Practice of Academic Advising.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Understanding Academic Advising Practice: Academic Advisors' Perceived Impact of an Academic Analytics Tool on the Practice of Academic Advising./
作者:
Dumont, Kristy Chene.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:
145 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International82-10A.
標題:
Higher education. -
電子資源:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28417111
ISBN:
9798708754707
Understanding Academic Advising Practice: Academic Advisors' Perceived Impact of an Academic Analytics Tool on the Practice of Academic Advising.
Dumont, Kristy Chene.
Understanding Academic Advising Practice: Academic Advisors' Perceived Impact of an Academic Analytics Tool on the Practice of Academic Advising.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 145 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2021.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Higher education institutions are facing growing pressure to improve retention and graduation rates. Academic analytics has emerged as a strategy to address the completion issue. Because academic advisors are integral in providing successful student success initiatives and they often maintain relationships with students throughout their entire academic careers, academic advising is the essential component to increasing completion rates. Therefore, the technologies included in the academic analytics strategy most often impact academic advising work. The purpose of this study was to investigate how academic advisors perceive the practice of academic advising at Amey State University (ASU) in the context of changing technology tools, specifically the implementation of the Student Success System (SSS).The study used an exploratory qualitative methodology since there is little other research that seeks to understand the practice of academic advising from the advisors' perspective. Using the NACADA (2017a) Academic Advising Core Competencies as the conceptual framework this study explored how the use of an academic analytics tool changed the work academic advisors do through the Conceptual (understanding), Informational (knowledge), and Relational (skills) components. The participants were all academic advisors from Amey State University, a large, four-year, public, research one institution with a high population of undergraduate students (Carnegie Classification, 2018).The findings of this study reveal that the academic advisors have a strong focus on student success yet do not identify or connect with the broader student success goals of the institution. There is a lack of trust from the advisors in upper administration in regards to decision-making and a need for clear, transparent, and frequent communication between leaders and academic advisors regarding student success mission and goals. Integration of the Student Success System (SSS) into the academic advisors' daily practice only caused minor disruptions and little improvement to their practice of advising because of the inability to use most of the functions. This study concludes that academic advising practice is constantly changing and evolving due to internal and external forces. The increased attention to retention, completion, and persistence along with the rapid advancements in technology tools to assist these efforts will mark the next era of academic advising practice. Academic advising will need to find ways to deal with the rapid changes in technology tools and seek best practices in transitioning from one tool to another in order to keep pace with the changes.
ISBN: 9798708754707Subjects--Topical Terms:
641065
Higher education.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Academic advising
Understanding Academic Advising Practice: Academic Advisors' Perceived Impact of an Academic Analytics Tool on the Practice of Academic Advising.
LDR
:03982nmm a2200397 4500
001
2284389
005
20211123073010.5
008
220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798708754707
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28417111
035
$a
AAI28417111
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Dumont, Kristy Chene.
$3
3563556
245
1 0
$a
Understanding Academic Advising Practice: Academic Advisors' Perceived Impact of an Academic Analytics Tool on the Practice of Academic Advising.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2021
300
$a
145 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisor: Amey, Marilyn.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2021.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Higher education institutions are facing growing pressure to improve retention and graduation rates. Academic analytics has emerged as a strategy to address the completion issue. Because academic advisors are integral in providing successful student success initiatives and they often maintain relationships with students throughout their entire academic careers, academic advising is the essential component to increasing completion rates. Therefore, the technologies included in the academic analytics strategy most often impact academic advising work. The purpose of this study was to investigate how academic advisors perceive the practice of academic advising at Amey State University (ASU) in the context of changing technology tools, specifically the implementation of the Student Success System (SSS).The study used an exploratory qualitative methodology since there is little other research that seeks to understand the practice of academic advising from the advisors' perspective. Using the NACADA (2017a) Academic Advising Core Competencies as the conceptual framework this study explored how the use of an academic analytics tool changed the work academic advisors do through the Conceptual (understanding), Informational (knowledge), and Relational (skills) components. The participants were all academic advisors from Amey State University, a large, four-year, public, research one institution with a high population of undergraduate students (Carnegie Classification, 2018).The findings of this study reveal that the academic advisors have a strong focus on student success yet do not identify or connect with the broader student success goals of the institution. There is a lack of trust from the advisors in upper administration in regards to decision-making and a need for clear, transparent, and frequent communication between leaders and academic advisors regarding student success mission and goals. Integration of the Student Success System (SSS) into the academic advisors' daily practice only caused minor disruptions and little improvement to their practice of advising because of the inability to use most of the functions. This study concludes that academic advising practice is constantly changing and evolving due to internal and external forces. The increased attention to retention, completion, and persistence along with the rapid advancements in technology tools to assist these efforts will mark the next era of academic advising practice. Academic advising will need to find ways to deal with the rapid changes in technology tools and seek best practices in transitioning from one tool to another in order to keep pace with the changes.
590
$a
School code: 0128.
650
4
$a
Higher education.
$3
641065
650
4
$a
Educational technology.
$3
517670
650
4
$a
Educational evaluation.
$3
526425
650
4
$a
School counseling.
$3
2144793
653
$a
Academic advising
653
$a
Academic advising practice
653
$a
Academic advisors
653
$a
Academic analytics
653
$a
Student retention
653
$a
Student graduation rates
690
$a
0443
690
$a
0745
690
$a
0710
690
$a
0519
710
2
$a
Michigan State University.
$b
Higher, Adult, and Lifelong Education - Doctor of Philosophy.
$3
2036362
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
82-10A.
790
$a
0128
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2021
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28417111
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9436122
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入