東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Machine Learning and Security Studies.

Dorsey, Spencer.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Machine Learning and Security Studies.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Machine Learning and Security Studies./
作者:	Dorsey, Spencer.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	148 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-08B.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28149955
ISBN:	9798557084819

Machine Learning and Security Studies.
Dorsey, Spencer.

Machine Learning and Security Studies. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 148 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

I present three papers that demonstrate how the cultural and technological advances in the machine learning literature can and should impact quantitative security studies. Although the math behind many machine learning techniques is not dissimilar to many statistical techniques, machine learning is heavily focused on predictive capacity. I argue that quantitative security studies should take a similar approach and take advantage of the advances made in the machine learning literature. In the first paper I analyze the practical utility of economic shocks as a tool for forecasting violence in four African countries. Several similar studies have published statistically significant findings that carry implicit or explicit recommendations to policy makers. However, I find that despite the technical sophistication of the original papers, the mechanism fails to add value to otherwise similar forecasting models, casting serious doubt on the actual utility of similar models. In the second paper I present PEMA: a flexible and powerful new system for creating event data using machine learning. Stagnation in the data available for quantitative analysis frustrates progress and can lead to erroneous findings and PEMA can play an import role in addressing that problem. In the final paper I argue that digital insecurities reduce conflict and encourage cooperation by decreasing the amount of private information between states. Testing my argument requires dealing with complex systems and data for which common statistical tests would be inadequate. Again, I turn to machine learning to show that digital information can play a strong role in encouraging interstate cooperation.

ISBN: 9798557084819Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Machine learning

Machine Learning and Security Studies.
LDR:02986nmm a2200445 4500 001 2284267
005 20211115072420.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798557084819
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28149955
035 $a AAI28149955
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Dorsey, Spencer. $3 3563424
245 1 0 $a Machine Learning and Security Studies.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 148 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Feaver, Peter D.;de Marchi, Scott.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a I present three papers that demonstrate how the cultural and technological advances in the machine learning literature can and should impact quantitative security studies. Although the math behind many machine learning techniques is not dissimilar to many statistical techniques, machine learning is heavily focused on predictive capacity. I argue that quantitative security studies should take a similar approach and take advantage of the advances made in the machine learning literature. In the first paper I analyze the practical utility of economic shocks as a tool for forecasting violence in four African countries. Several similar studies have published statistically significant findings that carry implicit or explicit recommendations to policy makers. However, I find that despite the technical sophistication of the original papers, the mechanism fails to add value to otherwise similar forecasting models, casting serious doubt on the actual utility of similar models. In the second paper I present PEMA: a flexible and powerful new system for creating event data using machine learning. Stagnation in the data available for quantitative analysis frustrates progress and can lead to erroneous findings and PEMA can play an import role in addressing that problem. In the final paper I argue that digital insecurities reduce conflict and encourage cooperation by decreasing the amount of private information between states. Testing my argument requires dealing with complex systems and data for which common statistical tests would be inadequate. Again, I turn to machine learning to show that digital information can play a strong role in encouraging interstate cooperation.
590 $a School code: 0066.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a African studies. $3 2122725
650 4 $a Artificial intelligence. $3 516317
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 532993
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
653 $a Machine learning
653 $a Security studies
653 $a Technological advances
653 $a Predictive capacity
653 $a Stagnation
653 $a Digital information
653 $a Interstate cooperation
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0293
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0501
710 2 $a Duke University. $b Political Science. $3 1022396
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-08B.
790 $a 0066
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28149955