東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Vertical Jump Landing Fatigue: The K...

von Hacht, Markus W.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Vertical Jump Landing Fatigue: The Kinetic, Kinematic, and Muscular Adaptations.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Vertical Jump Landing Fatigue: The Kinetic, Kinematic, and Muscular Adaptations./
Author:	von Hacht, Markus W.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	129 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-11.
Subject:	Kinematics. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28389256
ISBN:	9798708795823

Vertical Jump Landing Fatigue: The Kinetic, Kinematic, and Muscular Adaptations.
von Hacht, Markus W.

Vertical Jump Landing Fatigue: The Kinetic, Kinematic, and Muscular Adaptations. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 129 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--Queen's University (Canada), 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Understanding how fatigue affects task performance is crucial for understanding injury risk. Historically, the tests used to measure fatigue and the effects of that fatigue were not always similar to the tasks that generated that fatigue. Many studies that examine fatigue in jumping implement a pre-fatigue test, followed by a fatiguing protocol, and then a post-fatigue test. If the pre-fatigue and post-fatigue tests are not functionally similar to the fatiguing task, then the information obtained may not accurately represent the true effect of fatigue on the specific task. To avoid misinterpretation the testing tasks must be similar, or ideally identical, to the repetitive, fatiguing task. Therefore, in this study, a vertical countermovement jumping task was recorded continuously and the landing biomechanics were analyzed over time to explore how fatigue was manifest as jump performance decreased. The purpose of this study was to identify how landing biomechanics changed as the degree of fatigue increased.Kinematic, kinetic and muscular data were collected from 10 experienced jumpers, and 14 novice jumpers. For each participant, data were collected continuously during the continuous execution of 60 maximal vertical jumps, where the rest time between jumps was four seconds. Independent samples t-test assessed the difference between the novice and elite group. For the last 45 jumps of the fatigue protocol, slopes with 95% confidence intervals and correlations were computed to assess the rate of change for each variable and the relationship between the fatigue measures, and the landing biomechanical variables.Results demonstrate there was no significant difference between the novice and elite group mean slope for all variables. Three of the landing biomechanical variables had slopes significantly different from zero: the maximum knee angle (Kmax), the location of the maximum ground reaction force (GRF Loc), and one of the stiffness measure (Stiff5). Additionally, the changes in jump height are not correlated with changes in landing biomechanical variables (correlations < 0.50), which presents an important consideration for using jump height as a single variable for determining if individuals are at risk for a fatigue-related injury.

ISBN: 9798708795823Subjects--Topical Terms:

571109
Kinematics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Task performance

Vertical Jump Landing Fatigue: The Kinetic, Kinematic, and Muscular Adaptations.
LDR:03373nmm a2200349 4500 001 2283999
005 20211115072007.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798708795823
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28389256
035 $a (MiAaPQ)QueensUCan_197427658
035 $a AAI28389256
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a von Hacht, Markus W. $3 3563097
245 1 0 $a Vertical Jump Landing Fatigue: The Kinetic, Kinematic, and Muscular Adaptations.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 129 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.
500 $a Advisor: Costigan, Patrick.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--Queen's University (Canada), 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Understanding how fatigue affects task performance is crucial for understanding injury risk. Historically, the tests used to measure fatigue and the effects of that fatigue were not always similar to the tasks that generated that fatigue. Many studies that examine fatigue in jumping implement a pre-fatigue test, followed by a fatiguing protocol, and then a post-fatigue test. If the pre-fatigue and post-fatigue tests are not functionally similar to the fatiguing task, then the information obtained may not accurately represent the true effect of fatigue on the specific task. To avoid misinterpretation the testing tasks must be similar, or ideally identical, to the repetitive, fatiguing task. Therefore, in this study, a vertical countermovement jumping task was recorded continuously and the landing biomechanics were analyzed over time to explore how fatigue was manifest as jump performance decreased. The purpose of this study was to identify how landing biomechanics changed as the degree of fatigue increased.Kinematic, kinetic and muscular data were collected from 10 experienced jumpers, and 14 novice jumpers. For each participant, data were collected continuously during the continuous execution of 60 maximal vertical jumps, where the rest time between jumps was four seconds. Independent samples t-test assessed the difference between the novice and elite group. For the last 45 jumps of the fatigue protocol, slopes with 95% confidence intervals and correlations were computed to assess the rate of change for each variable and the relationship between the fatigue measures, and the landing biomechanical variables.Results demonstrate there was no significant difference between the novice and elite group mean slope for all variables. Three of the landing biomechanical variables had slopes significantly different from zero: the maximum knee angle (Kmax), the location of the maximum ground reaction force (GRF Loc), and one of the stiffness measure (Stiff5). Additionally, the changes in jump height are not correlated with changes in landing biomechanical variables (correlations < 0.50), which presents an important consideration for using jump height as a single variable for determining if individuals are at risk for a fatigue-related injury.
590 $a School code: 0283.
650 4 $a Kinematics. $3 571109
650 4 $a Exercise. $3 532868
650 4 $a Physical fitness. $3 522279
650 4 $a Muscle contraction. $3 578831
650 4 $a Athletes. $3 536205
650 4 $a Handball. $3 1518064
650 4 $a Electromyography. $3 592898
650 4 $a Muscle fatigue. $3 3563098
650 4 $a Ligaments. $3 3562651
650 4 $a Professional soccer. $3 3563003
650 4 $a Knee. $3 1364375
650 4 $a Jumping. $3 608848
650 4 $a Kinetics. $3 717752
650 4 $a Nervous system. $3 672432
650 4 $a Muscle function. $3 3562993
650 4 $a Spinal cord. $3 895443
650 4 $a Soccer. $3 520214
650 4 $a Biomechanics. $3 548685
650 4 $a Sports injuries. $3 520144
650 4 $a Heart rate. $3 3563099
653 $a Task performance
653 $a Jump landings
653 $a Sports injuries
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0648
710 2 $a Queen's University (Canada). $3 1017786
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-11.
790 $a 0283
791 $a M.Sc.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28389256