東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

How Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue ...

Finn, Mary Eileen.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Compares to Self-Myofascial Release on Improving Lower Extremity Function: A Meta-Analysis.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	How Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Compares to Self-Myofascial Release on Improving Lower Extremity Function: A Meta-Analysis./
Author:	Finn, Mary Eileen.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:	43 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-10B.
Subject:	Design. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28417713
ISBN:	9798708749178

How Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Compares to Self-Myofascial Release on Improving Lower Extremity Function: A Meta-Analysis.
Finn, Mary Eileen.

How Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Compares to Self-Myofascial Release on Improving Lower Extremity Function: A Meta-Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 43 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: B.

Thesis (D.P.T.)--California State University, Fresno, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Background: Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization is a skilled myofascial intervention that includes handheld tools, intended to be an extension of the clinician's hand. Current research lacks conclusive data supportive the efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on power. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine whether there is a difference in lower extremity power production between individuals who received instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and self-myofascial release.Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The databases used were Electronic Databases: Discover, Academic Search Complete (EBSCO), Science Direct Elsevier, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel software using the random effects model.Results: Four articles were included in this meta-analysis, including 2randomized controlled trials, one randomized crossover design, and one crossover within-subjects design. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale (PEDro) scale, revealing that these articles were of adequate to good quality. Power was measured by sprint and vertical jump outcome measures. Results favored self-myofascial release for sprint performance with a medium effect size of 0.45. Results again favored self-myofascial release for vertical jump performance with a medium effect size of 0.35.

ISBN: 9798708749178Subjects--Topical Terms:

518875
Design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization

How Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Compares to Self-Myofascial Release on Improving Lower Extremity Function: A Meta-Analysis.
LDR:02820nmm a2200385 4500 001 2283634
005 20211115071517.5
008 220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798708749178
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28417713
035 $a AAI28417713
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Finn, Mary Eileen. $3 3562622
245 1 0 $a How Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Compares to Self-Myofascial Release on Improving Lower Extremity Function: A Meta-Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 43 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Adame-Walker, Jennifer.
502 $a Thesis (D.P.T.)--California State University, Fresno, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Background: Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization is a skilled myofascial intervention that includes handheld tools, intended to be an extension of the clinician's hand. Current research lacks conclusive data supportive the efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on power. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine whether there is a difference in lower extremity power production between individuals who received instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and self-myofascial release.Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The databases used were Electronic Databases: Discover, Academic Search Complete (EBSCO), Science Direct Elsevier, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel software using the random effects model.Results: Four articles were included in this meta-analysis, including 2randomized controlled trials, one randomized crossover design, and one crossover within-subjects design. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale (PEDro) scale, revealing that these articles were of adequate to good quality. Power was measured by sprint and vertical jump outcome measures. Results favored self-myofascial release for sprint performance with a medium effect size of 0.45. Results again favored self-myofascial release for vertical jump performance with a medium effect size of 0.35.
590 $a School code: 6050.
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Physical therapy. $3 588713
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
653 $a Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization
653 $a Lower extremity
653 $a Power
653 $a Self-myofascial release
653 $a Sprint
653 $a Vertical jump
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0382
710 2 $a California State University, Fresno. $b Physical Therapy. $3 3286130
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-10B.
790 $a 6050
791 $a D.P.T.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28417713