東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Artificial Grammar Learning and Exec...

Chokkattu, Jocelyn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Artificial Grammar Learning and Executive Functions in Monolinguals and Bilinguals - An Eye Tracking Study.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Artificial Grammar Learning and Executive Functions in Monolinguals and Bilinguals - An Eye Tracking Study./
作者:	Chokkattu, Jocelyn.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	53 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-03.
標題:	Speech therapy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28086321
ISBN:	9798664705249

Artificial Grammar Learning and Executive Functions in Monolinguals and Bilinguals - An Eye Tracking Study.
Chokkattu, Jocelyn.

Artificial Grammar Learning and Executive Functions in Monolinguals and Bilinguals - An Eye Tracking Study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 53 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--MGH Institute of Health Professions, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The study presented here evaluated eye gaze patterns during artificial grammar learning (AGL) and executive functions in bilinguals and monolinguals. The study was motivated by previous reports that bilinguals have an advantage in Executive Functions (EF) and in Artificial Grammar Learning (AGL) over monolinguals and that eye gaze measures provide insight into implicit learning during AGL tasks. Participants completed an AGL task while their eye gaze was recorded. Additionally, EF tasks were administered to measure inhibition, attention shifting and working memory. Results failed to detect an advantage for bilinguals in AGL learning outcomes or measures of EF. More specifically, monolinguals achieved better learning outcomes in the AGL task, and while monolinguals outperformed bilinguals on the measure of inhibition, no difference was seen between the groups for working memory and attention shifting tasks. Additionally, there was no significant correlation between EFs and AGL performance. A relationship between eye-gaze and AGL performance wasfound, such that gaze time on and returns to violating letters in the strings predicted accuracy on the AGL task. Additional group differences were found in eye-gaze patterns, with monolinguals fixating more often and longer on strings than bilinguals. However, these patterns were not correlated with accuracy on the task.

ISBN: 9798664705249Subjects--Topical Terms:

520446
Speech therapy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Grammar learning

Artificial Grammar Learning and Executive Functions in Monolinguals and Bilinguals - An Eye Tracking Study.
LDR:02449nmm a2200325 4500 001 2283235
005 20211029084526.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798664705249
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28086321
035 $a AAI28086321
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chokkattu, Jocelyn. $3 3562173
245 1 0 $a Artificial Grammar Learning and Executive Functions in Monolinguals and Bilinguals - An Eye Tracking Study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 53 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.
500 $a Advisor: Arbel, Yael.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--MGH Institute of Health Professions, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The study presented here evaluated eye gaze patterns during artificial grammar learning (AGL) and executive functions in bilinguals and monolinguals. The study was motivated by previous reports that bilinguals have an advantage in Executive Functions (EF) and in Artificial Grammar Learning (AGL) over monolinguals and that eye gaze measures provide insight into implicit learning during AGL tasks. Participants completed an AGL task while their eye gaze was recorded. Additionally, EF tasks were administered to measure inhibition, attention shifting and working memory. Results failed to detect an advantage for bilinguals in AGL learning outcomes or measures of EF. More specifically, monolinguals achieved better learning outcomes in the AGL task, and while monolinguals outperformed bilinguals on the measure of inhibition, no difference was seen between the groups for working memory and attention shifting tasks. Additionally, there was no significant correlation between EFs and AGL performance. A relationship between eye-gaze and AGL performance wasfound, such that gaze time on and returns to violating letters in the strings predicted accuracy on the AGL task. Additional group differences were found in eye-gaze patterns, with monolinguals fixating more often and longer on strings than bilinguals. However, these patterns were not correlated with accuracy on the task.
590 $a School code: 0895.
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
653 $a Grammar learning
653 $a Executive functions
653 $a Eye tracking
690 $a 0460
710 2 $a MGH Institute of Health Professions. $b Communications, Sciences and Disorders. $3 3280935
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-03.
790 $a 0895
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28086321