東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Learning Syntax via Decomposition.

Ermolaeva, Marina.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Learning Syntax via Decomposition.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Learning Syntax via Decomposition./
作者:	Ermolaeva, Marina.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	170 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-01A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28491339
ISBN:	9798516959394

Learning Syntax via Decomposition.
Ermolaeva, Marina.

Learning Syntax via Decomposition. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 170 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Many patterns found in natural language syntax have multiple possible explanations or structural descriptions. Even within the currently dominant Minimalist theoretical framework (Chomsky 1995, 2000), it is not uncommon to encounter multiple analyses for the same phenomenon proposed in the literature. A natural question, then, is whether one could evaluate and compare syntactic proposals from a quantitative point of view. Taking this line of reasoning further, I aim to capture, formalize, and subsequently automate the intuition behind the process of developing a syntactic analysis.The contributions of this dissertation are threefold. First, I show how an evaluation measure inspired by the Minimum Description Length principle (Rissanen 1978) can be used to compare accounts of syntactic phenomena implemented as minimalist grammars (Stabler 1997), and how arguments for and against a given analysis translate into quantitative differences. Next, I build upon Kobele's (2018, to appear) notion of lexical item decomposition to propose a principled way of making linguistic generalizations by detecting and eliminating syntactic and phonological redundancies in the data. Finally, I design and implement an optimization algorithm capable of transforming a naive minimalist grammar over unsegmented words into a grammar over morphemes. As proof of concept, I conduct a number of experiments on fragments of the English grammar, including the auxiliary system, passives, and raising verbs; l-selection of prepositional phrases; and allomorphy in verb stems. The experiments demonstrate how optimizing a quantitative measure can produce linguistically plausible analyses similar to those proposed in theoretical literature.

ISBN: 9798516959394Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Minimalist grammars

Learning Syntax via Decomposition.
LDR:02789nmm a2200349 4500 001 2283145
005 20211022115654.5
008 220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798516959394
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28491339
035 $a AAI28491339
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ermolaeva, Marina. $0 (orcid)0000-0001-7796-7963 $3 3562062
245 1 0 $a Learning Syntax via Decomposition.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 170 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Goldsmith, John;Kobele, Gregory.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Many patterns found in natural language syntax have multiple possible explanations or structural descriptions. Even within the currently dominant Minimalist theoretical framework (Chomsky 1995, 2000), it is not uncommon to encounter multiple analyses for the same phenomenon proposed in the literature. A natural question, then, is whether one could evaluate and compare syntactic proposals from a quantitative point of view. Taking this line of reasoning further, I aim to capture, formalize, and subsequently automate the intuition behind the process of developing a syntactic analysis.The contributions of this dissertation are threefold. First, I show how an evaluation measure inspired by the Minimum Description Length principle (Rissanen 1978) can be used to compare accounts of syntactic phenomena implemented as minimalist grammars (Stabler 1997), and how arguments for and against a given analysis translate into quantitative differences. Next, I build upon Kobele's (2018, to appear) notion of lexical item decomposition to propose a principled way of making linguistic generalizations by detecting and eliminating syntactic and phonological redundancies in the data. Finally, I design and implement an optimization algorithm capable of transforming a naive minimalist grammar over unsegmented words into a grammar over morphemes. As proof of concept, I conduct a number of experiments on fragments of the English grammar, including the auxiliary system, passives, and raising verbs; l-selection of prepositional phrases; and allomorphy in verb stems. The experiments demonstrate how optimizing a quantitative measure can produce linguistically plausible analyses similar to those proposed in theoretical literature.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
650 4 $a Grammar. $3 899712
650 4 $a Use statistics. $3 3562063
650 4 $a Syntax. $3 897045
650 4 $a Graph representations. $3 3560730
650 4 $a Optimization. $3 891104
650 4 $a Dissertations & theses. $3 3560115
650 4 $a Decomposition. $3 3561186
650 4 $a Phonology. $3 891257
650 4 $a Natural language. $3 3562052
653 $a Minimalist grammars
653 $a Morphology
653 $a Syntax
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $b Linguistics. $3 1675470
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-01A.
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28491339