東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Discourse Markers in Second Language...

Reaves, Alisha Jacqueline.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Discourse Markers in Second Language French.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Discourse Markers in Second Language French./
作者:	Reaves, Alisha Jacqueline.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	371 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-03A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28089381
ISBN:	9798664744286

Discourse Markers in Second Language French.
Reaves, Alisha Jacqueline.

Discourse Markers in Second Language French. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 371 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In the field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA), the acquisition of pragmatic competence has received far less attention that grammatical competence. Early focus on the acquisition of pragmatic competence has often centered on speech acts or conventional expressions. Discourse markers, also known as discourse particles, pragmatic particles and pragmatic markers, have received increasing attention over the last twenty years. These "little words", are features of informal oral discourse and can contribute greatly to discourse cohesion and interlocutor interaction. Native speakers of French employ them extensively, and without them, discourse can seem stilted, unnatural or be difficult to follow. Despite their importance to communicative competence, they are largely ignored in the foreign language classroom and are generally presumed to be nearly un-acquirable without extensive immersion experience. And even with advanced language proficiency and extensive immersion experience, prior research has largely concluded that learners cannot or do not employ discourse markers like native speakers. This dissertation attempts to respond to this presumed limitation of foreign language (classroom) learners in examining the interlanguage of learners at three different proficiency levels. The 38 learners and 12 native speakers participated in an unstructured interview and completed three tasks: a narrative film retell, a film discussion and role-play scenarios, which were transcribed, coded and analyzed for their discourse marker use. The study identified discourse markers first by their function rather than from a predetermined list. The resulting inventory of discourse markers was then analyzed for frequency, variety and the range of functions expressed as learner proficiency increased. Results indicate that the frequency and variety of discourse markers produced does in general increase with proficiency. But interestingly, in concentrating on the functions expressed, we are able to observe shifts in discourse marker use for particular functions as the learner's lexicon expands to include a wider range of discourse markers. Ultimately learners make extensive use of the discourse markers lexically available to them to perform a wide variety of functions. They then modify and expand these functions as more discourse markers are added to their lexicon.

ISBN: 9798664744286Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Discourse markers

Discourse Markers in Second Language French.
LDR:03518nmm a2200361 4500 001 2283028
005 20211022115624.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798664744286
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28089381
035 $a AAI28089381
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Reaves, Alisha Jacqueline. $0 (orcid)0000-0001-5065-8431 $3 3561921
245 1 0 $a Discourse Markers in Second Language French.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 371 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Dekydtspotter, Laurent;Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In the field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA), the acquisition of pragmatic competence has received far less attention that grammatical competence. Early focus on the acquisition of pragmatic competence has often centered on speech acts or conventional expressions. Discourse markers, also known as discourse particles, pragmatic particles and pragmatic markers, have received increasing attention over the last twenty years. These "little words", are features of informal oral discourse and can contribute greatly to discourse cohesion and interlocutor interaction. Native speakers of French employ them extensively, and without them, discourse can seem stilted, unnatural or be difficult to follow. Despite their importance to communicative competence, they are largely ignored in the foreign language classroom and are generally presumed to be nearly un-acquirable without extensive immersion experience. And even with advanced language proficiency and extensive immersion experience, prior research has largely concluded that learners cannot or do not employ discourse markers like native speakers. This dissertation attempts to respond to this presumed limitation of foreign language (classroom) learners in examining the interlanguage of learners at three different proficiency levels. The 38 learners and 12 native speakers participated in an unstructured interview and completed three tasks: a narrative film retell, a film discussion and role-play scenarios, which were transcribed, coded and analyzed for their discourse marker use. The study identified discourse markers first by their function rather than from a predetermined list. The resulting inventory of discourse markers was then analyzed for frequency, variety and the range of functions expressed as learner proficiency increased. Results indicate that the frequency and variety of discourse markers produced does in general increase with proficiency. But interestingly, in concentrating on the functions expressed, we are able to observe shifts in discourse marker use for particular functions as the learner's lexicon expands to include a wider range of discourse markers. Ultimately learners make extensive use of the discourse markers lexically available to them to perform a wide variety of functions. They then modify and expand these functions as more discourse markers are added to their lexicon.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Foreign language learning. $3 3436780
650 4 $a Foreign language instruction. $3 3541319
653 $a Discourse markers
653 $a French
653 $a Second language acquisition
653 $a Second language pragmatics
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0444
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b French. $3 1065072
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-03A.
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28089381