東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Orders of Normativity: Nietzsche, Sc...

Callahan, Shane C.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Orders of Normativity: Nietzsche, Science and Agency.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Orders of Normativity: Nietzsche, Science and Agency./
作者:	Callahan, Shane C.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	162 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-11A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27740663
ISBN:	9798641784328

Orders of Normativity: Nietzsche, Science and Agency.
Callahan, Shane C.

Orders of Normativity: Nietzsche, Science and Agency. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 162 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In this dissertation I set out to address the "scope problem" in Nietzsche scholarship. In the secondary literature, the scope problem is characterized as a problem for Nietzsche, who seems deeply skeptical about nearly every item of his inherited western metaphysical toolkit. If his skepticism about western metaphysics penetrates all dimensions of his thought, how can he motivate a reader to also reject western metaphysics without himself committing to some of it? I stipulate that answering the scope problem means explicating what Nietzsche views as the general source of normativity-it is there that we can understand the resources Nietzsche is committing himself to, and the ones he rejects. I examine Leiter's solution to this problem, which assigns science as the general source of normativity. However, Leiter's solution depends on textual pedigree that I argue is inconsistent with the texts themselves. I argue that the normativity of science, instead of being the source of general normativity, represents an order of normativity for Nietzsche-but it is not ordered generally. I look to GS 341 to analyze "eternal recurrence," and argue that an expression of Nietzsche's "higher morality" can be located in the passage. Higher morality, I argue, places the general source of normativity in the value the reader places on her life. This account of higher morality solves the scope problem by narrowing it to readers who already accept or embrace the challenge of placing a level of value on their life commensurate with eternal recurrence.

ISBN: 9798641784328Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Ethical theory

Orders of Normativity: Nietzsche, Science and Agency.
LDR:02646nmm a2200361 4500 001 2282978
005 20211022115611.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798641784328
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27740663
035 $a AAI27740663
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Callahan, Shane C. $3 3561865
245 1 0 $a Orders of Normativity: Nietzsche, Science and Agency.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 162 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Turner, Stephen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In this dissertation I set out to address the "scope problem" in Nietzsche scholarship. In the secondary literature, the scope problem is characterized as a problem for Nietzsche, who seems deeply skeptical about nearly every item of his inherited western metaphysical toolkit. If his skepticism about western metaphysics penetrates all dimensions of his thought, how can he motivate a reader to also reject western metaphysics without himself committing to some of it? I stipulate that answering the scope problem means explicating what Nietzsche views as the general source of normativity-it is there that we can understand the resources Nietzsche is committing himself to, and the ones he rejects. I examine Leiter's solution to this problem, which assigns science as the general source of normativity. However, Leiter's solution depends on textual pedigree that I argue is inconsistent with the texts themselves. I argue that the normativity of science, instead of being the source of general normativity, represents an order of normativity for Nietzsche-but it is not ordered generally. I look to GS 341 to analyze "eternal recurrence," and argue that an expression of Nietzsche's "higher morality" can be located in the passage. Higher morality, I argue, places the general source of normativity in the value the reader places on her life. This account of higher morality solves the scope problem by narrowing it to readers who already accept or embrace the challenge of placing a level of value on their life commensurate with eternal recurrence.
590 $a School code: 0206.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Philosophy of science. $2 bicssc $3 2079849
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
653 $a Ethical theory
653 $a Naturalism
653 $a Nietzsche
653 $a Normativity
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0402
690 $a 0394
710 2 $a University of South Florida. $b Philosophy. $3 2093703
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-11A.
790 $a 0206
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27740663