東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Psychologist Perceptions of the Role...

Thornewill, Alice.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Psychologist Perceptions of the Role of Psychologists in National Security Interrogations: An Examination of Policy Decision-Making.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Psychologist Perceptions of the Role of Psychologists in National Security Interrogations: An Examination of Policy Decision-Making./
作者:	Thornewill, Alice.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	78 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-12B.
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27995683
ISBN:	9798641486116

Psychologist Perceptions of the Role of Psychologists in National Security Interrogations: An Examination of Policy Decision-Making.
Thornewill, Alice.

Psychologist Perceptions of the Role of Psychologists in National Security Interrogations: An Examination of Policy Decision-Making. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 78 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.

Thesis (J.D./Ph.D.)--Drexel University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this study was to examine the opinions of the general public and psychologists regarding the roles of psychologists in national security interrogations and other contexts that do not involve the delivery of traditional assessment and treatment services. The discussion following the release of the Hoffman Report has underscored the sharp differences in how the Report's findings are regarded. This survey of psychologists engaged in traditional and non-traditional professional activities, as well as the general public, sheds light on the broader perceptions of the Report's conclusions and implications, and helps determine future directions for the profession of psychology. Results revealed that the general public appears to be more accepting of psychologist involvement in national security settings - the type of activities highlighted in the Report as problematic - than psychologists. In addition, findings demonstrated that the perceptions of traditional and non-traditional psychologists regarding the appropriate role of psychologists across myriad settings do not differ significantly, perhaps indicating that the profession is less divided than initially thought after the Report's release. Implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed.

ISBN: 9798641486116Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

National security

Psychologist Perceptions of the Role of Psychologists in National Security Interrogations: An Examination of Policy Decision-Making.
LDR:02448nmm a2200361 4500 001 2282791
005 20211022115945.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798641486116
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27995683
035 $a AAI27995683
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Thornewill, Alice. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-5778-3718 $3 3561610
245 1 0 $a Psychologist Perceptions of the Role of Psychologists in National Security Interrogations: An Examination of Policy Decision-Making.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 78 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Heilbrun, Kirk.
502 $a Thesis (J.D./Ph.D.)--Drexel University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to examine the opinions of the general public and psychologists regarding the roles of psychologists in national security interrogations and other contexts that do not involve the delivery of traditional assessment and treatment services. The discussion following the release of the Hoffman Report has underscored the sharp differences in how the Report's findings are regarded. This survey of psychologists engaged in traditional and non-traditional professional activities, as well as the general public, sheds light on the broader perceptions of the Report's conclusions and implications, and helps determine future directions for the profession of psychology. Results revealed that the general public appears to be more accepting of psychologist involvement in national security settings - the type of activities highlighted in the Report as problematic - than psychologists. In addition, findings demonstrated that the perceptions of traditional and non-traditional psychologists regarding the appropriate role of psychologists across myriad settings do not differ significantly, perhaps indicating that the profession is less divided than initially thought after the Report's release. Implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0065.
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Counseling psychology. $3 924824
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
653 $a National security
653 $a Policy
653 $a Psychologist
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0603
710 2 $a Drexel University. $b Psychology (College of Arts and Sciences). $3 3191210
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-12B.
790 $a 0065
791 $a J.D./Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27995683