語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
A User-Generated Content Analysis of...
~
Kredens, Claire.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
A User-Generated Content Analysis of Tourists at Wildlife Tourism Attractions.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
A User-Generated Content Analysis of Tourists at Wildlife Tourism Attractions./
作者:
Kredens, Claire.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:
100 p.
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International82-11.
標題:
Recreation. -
電子資源:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28493551
ISBN:
9798738620430
A User-Generated Content Analysis of Tourists at Wildlife Tourism Attractions.
Kredens, Claire.
A User-Generated Content Analysis of Tourists at Wildlife Tourism Attractions.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 100 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.
Thesis (M.S.)--Arizona State University, 2021.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Two recent tourism trends are the growing wildlife tourism subsector of nature-based tourism and the increased use of social media in both marketing and for tourists to share their experiences. Until recently, the connection between social media and wildlife tourism remained understudied, and tourist behavior on Instagram after visiting wildlife tourism attractions (WTAs) remains unstudied. Some researchers call for more tourism research using social media data created by tourists, called user-generated content (UGC), to understand them. This netnographic study examines tourists who visited a range of WTAs by analyzing their post-visit photos and captions on Instagram through the lens of involvement theory to evaluate the strength of their connection to wildlife and conservation. Previous research has indicated that wildlife tourism can have extraordinary benefits to conservation and communities, but some WTAs, some of which are photo-prop tourism attractions where animals are handed over to tourists for selfies, have negative impacts on individual animals and species due to illegal sourcing, improper care, human interaction, and habituation. Findings from this study suggest that WTAs with good or excellent conservation and welfare practices lead to more highly involved tourists, ultimately benefitting community investment, animal welfare, and conservation efforts via the flow of tourist dollars and spread of information on social media, the tourist changing their behavior, or all of the aforementioned. Conversely, WTAs with negative conservation and welfare practices do not foster the same level of tourist involvement as their counterparts, often leading to more anthropocentric Instagram posts that do not spread conservation messaging or imply environmental behavior change. The implications from this research suggest that wildlife tourism attraction management practices should focus on conservation and welfare for the improvement of conservation efforts via policies, enforcement, larger governing bodies or organizations advocating or taking action, and future research on the potential impact COVID-19 had on the wildlife tourism industry.
ISBN: 9798738620430Subjects--Topical Terms:
535376
Recreation.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Animal welfare
A User-Generated Content Analysis of Tourists at Wildlife Tourism Attractions.
LDR
:03376nmm a2200385 4500
001
2282236
005
20211001100732.5
008
220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798738620430
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28493551
035
$a
AAI28493551
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Kredens, Claire.
$3
3561008
245
1 0
$a
A User-Generated Content Analysis of Tourists at Wildlife Tourism Attractions.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2021
300
$a
100 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.
500
$a
Advisor: Vogt, Christine;Budruk, Megha.
502
$a
Thesis (M.S.)--Arizona State University, 2021.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Two recent tourism trends are the growing wildlife tourism subsector of nature-based tourism and the increased use of social media in both marketing and for tourists to share their experiences. Until recently, the connection between social media and wildlife tourism remained understudied, and tourist behavior on Instagram after visiting wildlife tourism attractions (WTAs) remains unstudied. Some researchers call for more tourism research using social media data created by tourists, called user-generated content (UGC), to understand them. This netnographic study examines tourists who visited a range of WTAs by analyzing their post-visit photos and captions on Instagram through the lens of involvement theory to evaluate the strength of their connection to wildlife and conservation. Previous research has indicated that wildlife tourism can have extraordinary benefits to conservation and communities, but some WTAs, some of which are photo-prop tourism attractions where animals are handed over to tourists for selfies, have negative impacts on individual animals and species due to illegal sourcing, improper care, human interaction, and habituation. Findings from this study suggest that WTAs with good or excellent conservation and welfare practices lead to more highly involved tourists, ultimately benefitting community investment, animal welfare, and conservation efforts via the flow of tourist dollars and spread of information on social media, the tourist changing their behavior, or all of the aforementioned. Conversely, WTAs with negative conservation and welfare practices do not foster the same level of tourist involvement as their counterparts, often leading to more anthropocentric Instagram posts that do not spread conservation messaging or imply environmental behavior change. The implications from this research suggest that wildlife tourism attraction management practices should focus on conservation and welfare for the improvement of conservation efforts via policies, enforcement, larger governing bodies or organizations advocating or taking action, and future research on the potential impact COVID-19 had on the wildlife tourism industry.
590
$a
School code: 0010.
650
4
$a
Recreation.
$3
535376
650
4
$a
Wildlife conservation.
$2
fast
$3
542165
650
4
$a
Wildlife management.
$3
571816
653
$a
Animal welfare
653
$a
Involvement theory
653
$a
Netnography
653
$a
New environmental paradigm
653
$a
Photo prop tourism
653
$a
Wildlife interactions
690
$a
0814
690
$a
0284
690
$a
0286
710
2
$a
Arizona State University.
$b
Community Resources and Development.
$3
1676475
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
82-11.
790
$a
0010
791
$a
M.S.
792
$a
2021
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28493551
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9433969
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入