東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Influence of Social Context on C...

Setiawan, Andi.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Influence of Social Context on Co-Design Practice Between Indonesia and the UK.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Influence of Social Context on Co-Design Practice Between Indonesia and the UK./
作者:	Setiawan, Andi.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	345 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-10A.
標題:	Co-design. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28357513
ISBN:	9798597017488

The Influence of Social Context on Co-Design Practice Between Indonesia and the UK.
Setiawan, Andi.

The Influence of Social Context on Co-Design Practice Between Indonesia and the UK. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 345 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Co-design has its roots in the participatory design tradition in Scandinavia. The participatory root emphasises the active engagement of the user in the design process. The Scandinavian context and in general Western societies, especially with their democratic traditions, are deemed appropriate for the application of co-design methods. When co-design is applied outside the Western context, adjustments have to be done to respond to different contexts. Comparison between the context of Indonesia and the UK is employed as case studies in this study. Indonesia is considered to have a different context from the UK, where the value of democracy is still in the development stage, and the influence of the authoritarian regime is still strong. This study seeks to understand better how the influence of the different social contexts might inform the application of co-design. Furthermore, this study also uses those different characteristics of the co-design to develop recommendations for an alternative framework of co-design methods that are appropriate for the Indonesian context.The case study research was conducted on co-design projects both in Indonesia and the UK. In Indonesia, field research was conducted in Jakarta, Solo and Malang. While in the UK, field research was held in Lancaster, London and Worthing. The field research involved the member of the community, designers and other stakeholders involved in the co-design process. Field studies were conducted to determine the effectiveness of co-design based on four criteria: decision-making power, collaboration, flexibility and outcome-focused. Furthermore, the study also seeks on how the influence of contextual factors on the effectiveness of the co-design process.This study found that the most influenced criterion by different context are decision-making power. The UK case studies have indicated the shifting of the designer's power in the decision-making process. In contrary, in Indonesia, the decision still led by the designer. Moreover, the findings of the other criteria in both contexts are equally effective. Even so, there are differences in contextual factors that influence the effectiveness of each of these criteria. Furthermore, from the comparative analysis of the two contexts, a co-design method framework for Indonesia was developed. The lesson learned process from the advantages and disadvantages of implementing co-design in both contexts resulted in an 8 point co-design framework recommendation.

ISBN: 9798597017488Subjects--Topical Terms:

3560083
Co-design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Participatory design

The Influence of Social Context on Co-Design Practice Between Indonesia and the UK.
LDR:03671nmm a2200361 4500 001 2281447
005 20210920103006.5
008 220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798597017488
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28357513
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Lancaster_150401
035 $a AAI28357513
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Setiawan, Andi. $3 3560082
245 1 4 $a The Influence of Social Context on Co-Design Practice Between Indonesia and the UK.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 345 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Dunn, Nick;Cruickshank, Leon.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Co-design has its roots in the participatory design tradition in Scandinavia. The participatory root emphasises the active engagement of the user in the design process. The Scandinavian context and in general Western societies, especially with their democratic traditions, are deemed appropriate for the application of co-design methods. When co-design is applied outside the Western context, adjustments have to be done to respond to different contexts. Comparison between the context of Indonesia and the UK is employed as case studies in this study. Indonesia is considered to have a different context from the UK, where the value of democracy is still in the development stage, and the influence of the authoritarian regime is still strong. This study seeks to understand better how the influence of the different social contexts might inform the application of co-design. Furthermore, this study also uses those different characteristics of the co-design to develop recommendations for an alternative framework of co-design methods that are appropriate for the Indonesian context.The case study research was conducted on co-design projects both in Indonesia and the UK. In Indonesia, field research was conducted in Jakarta, Solo and Malang. While in the UK, field research was held in Lancaster, London and Worthing. The field research involved the member of the community, designers and other stakeholders involved in the co-design process. Field studies were conducted to determine the effectiveness of co-design based on four criteria: decision-making power, collaboration, flexibility and outcome-focused. Furthermore, the study also seeks on how the influence of contextual factors on the effectiveness of the co-design process.This study found that the most influenced criterion by different context are decision-making power. The UK case studies have indicated the shifting of the designer's power in the decision-making process. In contrary, in Indonesia, the decision still led by the designer. Moreover, the findings of the other criteria in both contexts are equally effective. Even so, there are differences in contextual factors that influence the effectiveness of each of these criteria. Furthermore, from the comparative analysis of the two contexts, a co-design method framework for Indonesia was developed. The lesson learned process from the advantages and disadvantages of implementing co-design in both contexts resulted in an 8 point co-design framework recommendation.
590 $a School code: 0416.
650 4 $a Co-design. $3 3560083
650 4 $a Councils. $3 3557627
650 4 $a Democracy. $3 519163
650 4 $a Citizen participation. $3 3560084
650 4 $a Cities. $3 3544022
650 4 $a Society. $3 700566
653 $a Participatory design
653 $a Public participation
653 $a Indonesia
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0222
690 $a 0344
710 2 $a Lancaster University (United Kingdom). $3 1294170
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-10A.
790 $a 0416
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28357513