東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Western Conservation as an Accidenta...

Deutsch, Sierra Michelle.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Western Conservation as an Accidental Vector for Capitalism: A Socioeconomic Cross-National Comparison of Irrawaddy Dolphin Conservation Projects.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Western Conservation as an Accidental Vector for Capitalism: A Socioeconomic Cross-National Comparison of Irrawaddy Dolphin Conservation Projects./
作者:	Deutsch, Sierra Michelle.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	230 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International79-04B.
標題:	Environmental Studies. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10285672
ISBN:	9780355142785

Western Conservation as an Accidental Vector for Capitalism: A Socioeconomic Cross-National Comparison of Irrawaddy Dolphin Conservation Projects.
Deutsch, Sierra Michelle.

Western Conservation as an Accidental Vector for Capitalism: A Socioeconomic Cross-National Comparison of Irrawaddy Dolphin Conservation Projects. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 230 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2017.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

As sites of global environmental degradation continue to emerge and pose significant threats to life on the planet, the world's natural resource managers persist in attempts to mitigate and reverse this degradation. While approaches to conservation have evolved over the years to include locals in the policy-making process, the experiences of those policies by locals - once in place - are often overlooked. This dissertation examines the socioeconomic and political changes associated with conservation projects from the perspectives and experiences of the people most affected by these projects. Through 128 individual interviews, 25 focus group discussions, and participant observation, I compare two approaches to Irrawaddy dolphin conservation: one in Myanmar that focuses on preservation of livelihoods and the other in Cambodia that focuses on economic development. I endeavor to bring local experiences and perceptions of these projects to the forefront to examine their impacts on livelihoods and to help identify potential gaps in policy intentions and effects. I also draw on political ecology theory to assess and critique the relationship of capitalism to international conservation. After explaining the unique issues and barriers associated with this project, I lay out the direct socioeconomic and ecological effects of each conservation project by comparing participant experiences and perceptions of the projects with those of conservation officials. I then compare conservation projects to examine the indirect effects of each approach. I trace the pathway of the capitalist conception of nature as commodities upward from 'developed' countries to its global institutionalization through the process of eco-governmentality and then downward to 'developing' countries through the delivery system of NGO governmentality. I explain how Myanmar blocked this delivery system while Cambodia embraced it and attribute the apparent shift from a 'communal ideology' to a 'consumerist ideology' in Cambodia, and lack of such a shift in Myanmar, to these opposing tactics. I then focus on the capitalist approach to conservation in Cambodia and show how this approach has led to the subsequent exacerbation of environmental and social problems it intended to fix. Lastly, I offer specific recommendations for each project, as well for international conservation in general, based on findings.

ISBN: 9780355142785Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669635
Environmental Studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Capitalism in conservation

Western Conservation as an Accidental Vector for Capitalism: A Socioeconomic Cross-National Comparison of Irrawaddy Dolphin Conservation Projects.
LDR:03757nmm a2200397 4500 001 2281322
005 20210920102936.5
008 220723s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355142785
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10285672
035 $a (MiAaPQ)oregon:11819
035 $a AAI10285672
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Deutsch, Sierra Michelle. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-6659-6092 $3 3559904
245 1 0 $a Western Conservation as an Accidental Vector for Capitalism: A Socioeconomic Cross-National Comparison of Irrawaddy Dolphin Conservation Projects.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 230 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: York, Richard F.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2017.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a As sites of global environmental degradation continue to emerge and pose significant threats to life on the planet, the world's natural resource managers persist in attempts to mitigate and reverse this degradation. While approaches to conservation have evolved over the years to include locals in the policy-making process, the experiences of those policies by locals - once in place - are often overlooked. This dissertation examines the socioeconomic and political changes associated with conservation projects from the perspectives and experiences of the people most affected by these projects. Through 128 individual interviews, 25 focus group discussions, and participant observation, I compare two approaches to Irrawaddy dolphin conservation: one in Myanmar that focuses on preservation of livelihoods and the other in Cambodia that focuses on economic development. I endeavor to bring local experiences and perceptions of these projects to the forefront to examine their impacts on livelihoods and to help identify potential gaps in policy intentions and effects. I also draw on political ecology theory to assess and critique the relationship of capitalism to international conservation. After explaining the unique issues and barriers associated with this project, I lay out the direct socioeconomic and ecological effects of each conservation project by comparing participant experiences and perceptions of the projects with those of conservation officials. I then compare conservation projects to examine the indirect effects of each approach. I trace the pathway of the capitalist conception of nature as commodities upward from 'developed' countries to its global institutionalization through the process of eco-governmentality and then downward to 'developing' countries through the delivery system of NGO governmentality. I explain how Myanmar blocked this delivery system while Cambodia embraced it and attribute the apparent shift from a 'communal ideology' to a 'consumerist ideology' in Cambodia, and lack of such a shift in Myanmar, to these opposing tactics. I then focus on the capitalist approach to conservation in Cambodia and show how this approach has led to the subsequent exacerbation of environmental and social problems it intended to fix. Lastly, I offer specific recommendations for each project, as well for international conservation in general, based on findings.
590 $a School code: 0171.
650 4 $a Environmental Studies. $3 1669635
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
653 $a Capitalism in conservation
653 $a Ecogovernmentality
653 $a Irrawaddy dolphin
653 $a Neoliberal conservation
653 $a Ngo-governmentality
653 $a Southeast asia
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0626
710 2 $a University of Oregon. $b Environmental Studies Program. $3 1674460
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 79-04B.
790 $a 0171
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10285672