東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effects of Social Comparative Fe...

Acain, Richelleann S.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effects of Social Comparative Feedback on Motor Skill Acquisition.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effects of Social Comparative Feedback on Motor Skill Acquisition./
作者:	Acain, Richelleann S.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	78 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-12.
標題:	Kinesiology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27963821
ISBN:	9798617090095

The Effects of Social Comparative Feedback on Motor Skill Acquisition.
Acain, Richelleann S.

The Effects of Social Comparative Feedback on Motor Skill Acquisition. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 78 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.

Thesis (M.S.)--California State University, Fullerton, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Social comparative feedback has been used to manipulate an individual's self-efficacy. Generally, positive social comparisons have been shown to increase self-efficacy and task enjoyment which leads to improved skill acquisition. Children and adults develop self-efficacy differently and may thus experience social comparative feedback differently. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether the effects of social comparative feedback was different in children and adults. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we were limited to studying only adults as data collection was required to cease before any data was collected with children.Eighteen college-aged participants, randomly assigned to one of three groups (positive, negative, and control), were asked to learn a soccer kicking task. All groups received feedback regarding their performance. Additionally, those in the positive and negative groups received positive or negative comments comparing their performance to individuals at another school. Our results did not match previous literature. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in retention or transfer. Although there seemed to be a trend in the expected direction, few statistically significant differences were observed. It is very likely that the unexpected results were caused by the very small sample size.

ISBN: 9798617090095Subjects--Topical Terms:

517627
Kinesiology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Motor learning

The Effects of Social Comparative Feedback on Motor Skill Acquisition.
LDR:02423nmm a2200325 4500 001 2281223
005 20210910100645.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798617090095
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27963821
035 $a AAI27963821
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Acain, Richelleann S. $3 3559811
245 1 4 $a The Effects of Social Comparative Feedback on Motor Skill Acquisition.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 78 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.
500 $a Advisor: Barros, Joao A. C.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--California State University, Fullerton, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Social comparative feedback has been used to manipulate an individual's self-efficacy. Generally, positive social comparisons have been shown to increase self-efficacy and task enjoyment which leads to improved skill acquisition. Children and adults develop self-efficacy differently and may thus experience social comparative feedback differently. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether the effects of social comparative feedback was different in children and adults. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we were limited to studying only adults as data collection was required to cease before any data was collected with children.Eighteen college-aged participants, randomly assigned to one of three groups (positive, negative, and control), were asked to learn a soccer kicking task. All groups received feedback regarding their performance. Additionally, those in the positive and negative groups received positive or negative comments comparing their performance to individuals at another school. Our results did not match previous literature. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in retention or transfer. Although there seemed to be a trend in the expected direction, few statistically significant differences were observed. It is very likely that the unexpected results were caused by the very small sample size.
590 $a School code: 6060.
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 517627
650 4 $a COVID-19. $3 3554449
653 $a Motor learning
653 $a Motor skill acquisition
653 $a Social-comparative feedback
690 $a 0575
710 2 $a California State University, Fullerton. $b Kinesiology. $3 3183209
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-12.
790 $a 6060
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27963821