東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Relative Entitlements: Reckoning Rec...

Kashmeri, Shireen D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Relative Entitlements: Reckoning Recipients' Access to Publicly-Funded Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) & Cultural Understandings of Kinship and Gender in Quebec (Canada).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Relative Entitlements: Reckoning Recipients' Access to Publicly-Funded Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) & Cultural Understandings of Kinship and Gender in Quebec (Canada)./
作者:	Kashmeri, Shireen D.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	278 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-01B.
標題:	Cultural anthropology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27736956
ISBN:	9798662394605

Relative Entitlements: Reckoning Recipients' Access to Publicly-Funded Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) & Cultural Understandings of Kinship and Gender in Quebec (Canada).
Kashmeri, Shireen D.

Relative Entitlements: Reckoning Recipients' Access to Publicly-Funded Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) & Cultural Understandings of Kinship and Gender in Quebec (Canada). - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 278 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Between August 2010 to November 2015, Quebec was the only jurisdiction in North America to fund assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). This government financing was comprehensive. It provided three rounds of in vitro fertilization along with a host of other fertility treatments and medications. Though public funding removed economic constraints to ART usage, not everyone gained equal access. This followed from regulatory gaps, which set the stage for uneven access among recipients. Recipients experienced processes of inclusion or exclusion, which unfolded in keeping with cultural ideas concerning kinship and gender. Kinship and gender were meaningful in the way recipients were recognized as being more or less "worthy" of reproducing than others. This corresponded with new forms of stratified reproduction that redefined reproductive autonomy. This dissertation will focus on those who were most recognizably in need of public ARTs, such as heterosexual and same-sex couples (in particular lesbians). It will also follow those who were pushed aside: women with advanced maternal age, single women, and women deemed to have a high body mass. Among all these recipients, ART access entailed paradoxes tied to kinship and gender. Inevitably, this caused some recipients to be considered more "worthy" than others of public ARTs. Public ARTs might have been used in novel ways, but my work will show reproductive possibilities often replicated comprehensible kinship and gender relations. Financial means remained an index of who was seen as a worthy recipient and deserved to have a family. Gay and lesbian ART access was conditional and tied to family law and financial means. Women's age, social status, and body mass were troubling conditions of exclusion. Moreover, contrary to the program's aims, public ARTs encouraged an already robust ART market. Based on participant observation at three clinical sites in Montreal (Quebec) between 2011 and 2013, and over 100 interviews with patients and a small group of providers, I will illustrate how ART access and availability is a contested arena that (re)produces kinship and gender relations in certain ways. This shows that access is much more complex than whether the state decides to fund ARTs.

ISBN: 9798662394605Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122764
Cultural anthropology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Anthropology

Relative Entitlements: Reckoning Recipients' Access to Publicly-Funded Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) & Cultural Understandings of Kinship and Gender in Quebec (Canada).
LDR:03661nmm a2200433 4500 001 2280375
005 20210827095935.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798662394605
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27736956
035 $a AAI27736956
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kashmeri, Shireen D. $3 3558889
245 1 0 $a Relative Entitlements: Reckoning Recipients' Access to Publicly-Funded Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) & Cultural Understandings of Kinship and Gender in Quebec (Canada).
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 278 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Bamford, Sandra.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Between August 2010 to November 2015, Quebec was the only jurisdiction in North America to fund assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). This government financing was comprehensive. It provided three rounds of in vitro fertilization along with a host of other fertility treatments and medications. Though public funding removed economic constraints to ART usage, not everyone gained equal access. This followed from regulatory gaps, which set the stage for uneven access among recipients. Recipients experienced processes of inclusion or exclusion, which unfolded in keeping with cultural ideas concerning kinship and gender. Kinship and gender were meaningful in the way recipients were recognized as being more or less "worthy" of reproducing than others. This corresponded with new forms of stratified reproduction that redefined reproductive autonomy. This dissertation will focus on those who were most recognizably in need of public ARTs, such as heterosexual and same-sex couples (in particular lesbians). It will also follow those who were pushed aside: women with advanced maternal age, single women, and women deemed to have a high body mass. Among all these recipients, ART access entailed paradoxes tied to kinship and gender. Inevitably, this caused some recipients to be considered more "worthy" than others of public ARTs. Public ARTs might have been used in novel ways, but my work will show reproductive possibilities often replicated comprehensible kinship and gender relations. Financial means remained an index of who was seen as a worthy recipient and deserved to have a family. Gay and lesbian ART access was conditional and tied to family law and financial means. Women's age, social status, and body mass were troubling conditions of exclusion. Moreover, contrary to the program's aims, public ARTs encouraged an already robust ART market. Based on participant observation at three clinical sites in Montreal (Quebec) between 2011 and 2013, and over 100 interviews with patients and a small group of providers, I will illustrate how ART access and availability is a contested arena that (re)produces kinship and gender relations in certain ways. This shows that access is much more complex than whether the state decides to fund ARTs.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Cultural anthropology. $3 2122764
650 4 $a Medical ethics. $3 526828
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Canadian studies. $3 2122858
650 4 $a Obstetrics. $3 634501
650 4 $a Health care management. $3 2122906
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
653 $a Anthropology
653 $a Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs)
653 $a In vitro fertilization
653 $a Kinship
653 $a Public funding
653 $a Quebec
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0497
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0380
690 $a 0385
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0769
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b Anthropology. $3 2100321
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-01B.
790 $a 0779
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27736956