東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Semiotic Reading of Hyperrealism i...

Morandi, Maria Cristina.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Semiotic Reading of Hyperrealism in the Soviet Union: Representations of the Soviet Urbanscape in the 1970s and 1980s as a New Form of Critical Realism = = Семиотическое прочтение гиперреализма в Советском Союзе: репрезентация советского городского пейзажа в 1970-х и 1980-х годах как новая форма критического реализма.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Semiotic Reading of Hyperrealism in the Soviet Union: Representations of the Soviet Urbanscape in the 1970s and 1980s as a New Form of Critical Realism =/
其他題名:	Семиотическое прочтение гиперреализма в Советском Союзе: репрезентация советского городского пейзажа в 1970-х и 1980-х годах как новая форма критического реализма.
作者:	Morandi, Maria Cristina.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	461 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-09A.
標題:	Art criticism. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22616762
ISBN:	9781392343890

A Semiotic Reading of Hyperrealism in the Soviet Union: Representations of the Soviet Urbanscape in the 1970s and 1980s as a New Form of Critical Realism = = Семиотическое прочтение гиперреализма в Советском Союзе: репрезентация советского городского пейзажа в 1970-х и 1980-х годах как новая форма критического реализма.
Morandi, Maria Cristina.

A Semiotic Reading of Hyperrealism in the Soviet Union: Representations of the Soviet Urbanscape in the 1970s and 1980s as a New Form of Critical Realism =Семиотическое прочтение гиперреализма в Советском Союзе: репрезентация советского городского пейзажа в 1970-х и 1980-х годах как новая форма критического реализма. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 461 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In the 1950s and 1960s, the Western-established dichotomy between style and ideology, embodied by modernism and realism, was dominant. This dichotomy tended to suppress, marginalize or ostracize realism in the Soviet Union by reducing it to the leftist political project. This dissertation presents a critical reassessment of realism in the Soviet Union by challenging its representation as a monolithic phenomenon through the analysis of hyperrealism in the 1970s and 1980s. My analyses of Ando Keskkula, Jaan Elken, Semyon Faibisovich and Sergei Sherstiuk's hyperrealist artworks, based on Yuri Lotman's semiotic theory of culture, show the influence on their artistic production of the social and cultural system of signs of the Soviet society, as displayed in architecture, means of transport, and housing, along with the artist's personal agenda. Rather than the idealized conditions promoted by official doctrine, these artists adopted a unique strategy to subvert the predominant Socialist realist political rhetoric by representing the actual conditions of decay and collapse of Tallinn and Moscow's urban environment as a powerful metaphor for the existential condition of alienation and seclusion experienced by the population in the last years of the Soviet era. While Keskkula, Elken, Faibisovich, and Sherstiuk remained committed to a figurative style they also tested and broadened the boundaries of realism, by breaking its rules through means and visual strategies which included the concepts of mimesis, original creativity, the artists' agency, use of quotation and technical reproduction. In doing so, they problematized the discourse on the perception of reality in a totalitarian society, while introducing a critical third way distinct from the socialist realism and the formalist praxis of non-conformist artists of their time.

ISBN: 9781392343890Subjects--Topical Terms:

526357
Art criticism.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Semiotic theory

A Semiotic Reading of Hyperrealism in the Soviet Union: Representations of the Soviet Urbanscape in the 1970s and 1980s as a New Form of Critical Realism = = Семиотическое прочтение гиперреализма в Советском Союзе: репрезентация советского городского пейзажа в 1970-х и 1980-х годах как новая форма критического реализма.
LDR:03394nmm a2200361 4500 001 2280364
005 20210827095932.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392343890
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI22616762
035 $a AAI22616762
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Morandi, Maria Cristina. $3 3558879
245 1 0 $a A Semiotic Reading of Hyperrealism in the Soviet Union: Representations of the Soviet Urbanscape in the 1970s and 1980s as a New Form of Critical Realism = $b Семиотическое прочтение гиперреализма в Советском Союзе: репрезентация советского городского пейзажа в 1970-х и 1980-х годах как новая форма критического реализма.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 461 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Sharp, Jane A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In the 1950s and 1960s, the Western-established dichotomy between style and ideology, embodied by modernism and realism, was dominant. This dichotomy tended to suppress, marginalize or ostracize realism in the Soviet Union by reducing it to the leftist political project. This dissertation presents a critical reassessment of realism in the Soviet Union by challenging its representation as a monolithic phenomenon through the analysis of hyperrealism in the 1970s and 1980s. My analyses of Ando Keskkula, Jaan Elken, Semyon Faibisovich and Sergei Sherstiuk's hyperrealist artworks, based on Yuri Lotman's semiotic theory of culture, show the influence on their artistic production of the social and cultural system of signs of the Soviet society, as displayed in architecture, means of transport, and housing, along with the artist's personal agenda. Rather than the idealized conditions promoted by official doctrine, these artists adopted a unique strategy to subvert the predominant Socialist realist political rhetoric by representing the actual conditions of decay and collapse of Tallinn and Moscow's urban environment as a powerful metaphor for the existential condition of alienation and seclusion experienced by the population in the last years of the Soviet era. While Keskkula, Elken, Faibisovich, and Sherstiuk remained committed to a figurative style they also tested and broadened the boundaries of realism, by breaking its rules through means and visual strategies which included the concepts of mimesis, original creativity, the artists' agency, use of quotation and technical reproduction. In doing so, they problematized the discourse on the perception of reality in a totalitarian society, while introducing a critical third way distinct from the socialist realism and the formalist praxis of non-conformist artists of their time.
590 $a School code: 0190.
650 4 $a Art criticism. $3 526357
650 4 $a Architecture. $3 523581
650 4 $a Russian history. $3 3173845
650 4 $a Slavic studies. $3 3171903
653 $a Semiotic theory
653 $a Soviet Hyperrealism
653 $a Urban sociology
690 $a 0365
690 $a 0729
690 $a 0724
690 $a 0614
710 2 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies. $b Art History. $3 3354477
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-09A.
790 $a 0190
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22616762