東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Exploratory Team Cognition and Resil...

Lematta, Glenn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploratory Team Cognition and Resilience in Human Agent Teaming.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Exploratory Team Cognition and Resilience in Human Agent Teaming./
作者:	Lematta, Glenn.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	60 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-03.
標題:	Systems science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22585411
ISBN:	9781085690812

Exploratory Team Cognition and Resilience in Human Agent Teaming.
Lematta, Glenn.

Exploratory Team Cognition and Resilience in Human Agent Teaming. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 60 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--Arizona State University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Human-agent teams (HATs) are expected to play a larger role in future command and control systems where resilience is critical for team effectiveness. The question of how HATs interact to be effective in both normal and unexpected situations is worthy of further examination. Exploratory behaviors are one that way adaptive systems discover opportunities to expand and refine their performance. In this study, team interaction exploration is examined in a HAT composed of a human navigator, human photographer, and a synthetic pilot while they perform a remotely-piloted aerial reconnaissance task. Failures in automation and the synthetic pilot's autonomy were injected throughout ten missions as roadblocks. Teams were clustered by performance into high-, middle-, and low-performing groups. It was hypothesized that high-performing teams would exchange more text-messages containing unique content or sender-recipient combinations than middle- and low-performing teams, and that teams would exchange less unique messages over time. The results indicate that high-performing teams had more unique team interactions than middle-performing teams. Additionally, teams generally had more exploratory team interactions in the first session of missions than the second session. Implications and suggestions for future work are discussed.

ISBN: 9781085690812Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168411
Systems science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Communication

Exploratory Team Cognition and Resilience in Human Agent Teaming.
LDR:02481nmm a2200385 4500 001 2280361
005 20210827095931.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781085690812
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI22585411
035 $a AAI22585411
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lematta, Glenn. $3 3558876
245 1 0 $a Exploratory Team Cognition and Resilience in Human Agent Teaming.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 60 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03.
500 $a Advisor: Chiou, Erin K.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Arizona State University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Human-agent teams (HATs) are expected to play a larger role in future command and control systems where resilience is critical for team effectiveness. The question of how HATs interact to be effective in both normal and unexpected situations is worthy of further examination. Exploratory behaviors are one that way adaptive systems discover opportunities to expand and refine their performance. In this study, team interaction exploration is examined in a HAT composed of a human navigator, human photographer, and a synthetic pilot while they perform a remotely-piloted aerial reconnaissance task. Failures in automation and the synthetic pilot's autonomy were injected throughout ten missions as roadblocks. Teams were clustered by performance into high-, middle-, and low-performing groups. It was hypothesized that high-performing teams would exchange more text-messages containing unique content or sender-recipient combinations than middle- and low-performing teams, and that teams would exchange less unique messages over time. The results indicate that high-performing teams had more unique team interactions than middle-performing teams. Additionally, teams generally had more exploratory team interactions in the first session of missions than the second session. Implications and suggestions for future work are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Systems science. $3 3168411
650 4 $a Artificial intelligence. $3 516317
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
653 $a Communication
653 $a Exploration
653 $a Human-agent teaming
653 $a Resilience
653 $a Situation awareness
653 $a Team cognition
690 $a 0790
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0459
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Human Systems Engineering. $3 3351612
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-03.
790 $a 0010
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22585411