東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

'The People's Glossary': Using Dialo...

Curd, Emma Louise.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

'The People's Glossary': Using Dialogic Art to Create a Common Language for User-Led Museum Practice.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	'The People's Glossary': Using Dialogic Art to Create a Common Language for User-Led Museum Practice./
作者:	Curd, Emma Louise.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	233 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-07A.
標題:	Critical theory. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28329136
ISBN:	9798569911721

'The People's Glossary': Using Dialogic Art to Create a Common Language for User-Led Museum Practice.
Curd, Emma Louise.

'The People's Glossary': Using Dialogic Art to Create a Common Language for User-Led Museum Practice. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 233 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Liverpool John Moores University (United Kingdom), 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

It is understood that language is a powerful mediator of social hierarchy with great influence to emancipate, educate or exclude. Meanwhile, discourses centred on expertise, representation and authorship have re-emerged as priorities in collections of contemporary art due to pressures for them to be reinstated as dialogical resources. This is especially true for those where participatory practices are being challenged due to their failure to prioritise public discourse over dominant, institutional ones. Even after attempts to democratise collections via processes to co-write interpretation, they struggle to represent community co-authors ethically and transparently. This thesis argues that language use and misrepresentation prevent publics from using collections of contemporary art and feeling like they belong in them. Using discourse theory and participatory action research, this study interrogates the processes used by collections to co-author the interpretation of artworks to create 'equitable plurality' and offers up a toolkit of arts-based practices to engender usership. Drawn from dialogic practices and qualitative research, the investigation examines the politics of discourse and plurality of speech - spoken and written - to contribute a unique focus on language generated and used by publics to create a common language. Undertaken with multiple communities of practice associated with Tate Liverpool's collection 'Constellations', this research concludes in the production of a crowd-sourced digital resource titled The People's Glossary. By revisiting and reinterpreting keywords with publics as a dialogic practice, this body of work contributes processes and research to embed plurality in collections of contemporary art.

ISBN: 9798569911721Subjects--Topical Terms:

525076
Critical theory.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Art museums

'The People's Glossary': Using Dialogic Art to Create a Common Language for User-Led Museum Practice.
LDR:02982nmm a2200361 4500 001 2280111
005 20210823091523.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798569911721
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28329136
035 $a (MiAaPQ)LiverpoolJohnMoores12518
035 $a AAI28329136
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Curd, Emma Louise. $3 3558613
245 1 0 $a 'The People's Glossary': Using Dialogic Art to Create a Common Language for User-Led Museum Practice.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 233 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Byrne, John; Wilson, Kerry; Fallows, Colin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Liverpool John Moores University (United Kingdom), 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a It is understood that language is a powerful mediator of social hierarchy with great influence to emancipate, educate or exclude. Meanwhile, discourses centred on expertise, representation and authorship have re-emerged as priorities in collections of contemporary art due to pressures for them to be reinstated as dialogical resources. This is especially true for those where participatory practices are being challenged due to their failure to prioritise public discourse over dominant, institutional ones. Even after attempts to democratise collections via processes to co-write interpretation, they struggle to represent community co-authors ethically and transparently. This thesis argues that language use and misrepresentation prevent publics from using collections of contemporary art and feeling like they belong in them. Using discourse theory and participatory action research, this study interrogates the processes used by collections to co-author the interpretation of artworks to create 'equitable plurality' and offers up a toolkit of arts-based practices to engender usership. Drawn from dialogic practices and qualitative research, the investigation examines the politics of discourse and plurality of speech - spoken and written - to contribute a unique focus on language generated and used by publics to create a common language. Undertaken with multiple communities of practice associated with Tate Liverpool's collection 'Constellations', this research concludes in the production of a crowd-sourced digital resource titled The People's Glossary. By revisiting and reinterpreting keywords with publics as a dialogic practice, this body of work contributes processes and research to embed plurality in collections of contemporary art.
590 $a School code: 8357.
650 4 $a Critical theory. $3 525076
650 4 $a Artists. $3 524768
650 4 $a Culture. $3 517003
650 4 $a Democracy. $3 519163
650 4 $a Modernity. $2 lcstt $3 3266067
650 4 $a Museum studies. $3 2122775
650 4 $a Art criticism. $3 526357
650 4 $a Sociolinguistics. $3 524467
653 $a Art museums
653 $a Contemporary art
653 $a Communities of practice
690 $a 0730
690 $a 0365
690 $a 0636
710 2 $a Liverpool John Moores University (United Kingdom). $3 3556313
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-07A.
790 $a 8357
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28329136